Genesis 14:1-24

The Blessing of Victory for God’s People

14:1 At that time Amraphel king of Shinar, Arioch king of Ellasar, Kedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal king of nations 14:2 went to war against Bera king of Sodom, Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (that is, Zoar). 14:3 These last five kings joined forces in the Valley of Siddim (that is, the Salt Sea). 14:4 For twelve years they had served Kedorlaomer, but in the thirteenth year 10  they rebelled. 11  14:5 In the fourteenth year, Kedorlaomer and the kings who were his allies came and defeated 12  the Rephaites in Ashteroth Karnaim, the Zuzites in Ham, the Emites in Shaveh Kiriathaim, 14:6 and the Horites in their hill country of Seir, as far as El Paran, which is near the desert. 13  14:7 Then they attacked En Mishpat (that is, Kadesh) again, 14  and they conquered all the territory of the Amalekites, as well as the Amorites who were living in Hazazon Tamar.

14:8 Then the king of Sodom, the king of Gomorrah, the king of Admah, the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (that is, Zoar) went out and prepared for battle. In the Valley of Siddim they met 15  14:9 Kedorlaomer king of Elam, Tidal king of nations, 16  Amraphel king of Shinar, and Arioch king of Ellasar. Four kings fought against 17  five. 14:10 Now the Valley of Siddim was full of tar pits. 18  When the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled, they fell into them, 19  but some survivors 20  fled to the hills. 21  14:11 The four victorious kings 22  took all the possessions and food of Sodom and Gomorrah and left. 14:12 They also took Abram’s nephew 23  Lot and his possessions when 24  they left, for Lot 25  was living in Sodom. 26 

14:13 A fugitive 27  came and told Abram the Hebrew. 28  Now Abram was living by the oaks 29  of Mamre the Amorite, the brother 30  of Eshcol and Aner. (All these were allied by treaty 31  with Abram.) 32  14:14 When Abram heard that his nephew 33  had been taken captive, he mobilized 34  his 318 trained men who had been born in his household, and he pursued the invaders 35  as far as Dan. 36  14:15 Then, during the night, 37  Abram 38  divided his forces 39  against them and defeated them. He chased them as far as Hobah, which is north 40  of Damascus. 14:16 He retrieved all the stolen property. 41  He also brought back his nephew Lot and his possessions, as well as the women and the rest of 42  the people.

14:17 After Abram 43  returned from defeating Kedorlaomer and the kings who were with him, the king of Sodom went out to meet Abram 44  in the Valley of Shaveh (known as the King’s Valley). 45  14:18 Melchizedek king of Salem 46  brought out bread and wine. (Now he was the priest of the Most High God.) 47  14:19 He blessed Abram, saying,

“Blessed be Abram by 48  the Most High God,

Creator 49  of heaven and earth. 50 

14:20 Worthy of praise is 51  the Most High God,

who delivered 52  your enemies into your hand.”

Abram gave Melchizedek 53  a tenth of everything.

14:21 Then the king of Sodom said to Abram, “Give me the people and take the possessions for yourself.” 14:22 But Abram replied to the king of Sodom, “I raise my hand 54  to the Lord, the Most High God, Creator of heaven and earth, and vow 55  14:23 that I will take nothing 56  belonging to you, not even a thread or the strap of a sandal. That way you can never say, ‘It is I 57  who made Abram rich.’ 14:24 I will take nothing 58  except compensation for what the young men have eaten. 59  As for the share of the men who went with me – Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre – let them take their share.”

Genesis 1:11

1:11 God said, “Let the land produce vegetation: 60  plants yielding seeds according to their kinds, 61  and 62  trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds.” It was so.

Romans 3:2

3:2 Actually, there are many advantages. 63  First of all, 64  the Jews 65  were entrusted with the oracles of God. 66 

Romans 3:2

3:2 Actually, there are many advantages. 67  First of all, 68  the Jews 69  were entrusted with the oracles of God. 70 

Romans 1:4

1:4 who was appointed the Son-of-God-in-power 71  according to the Holy Spirit 72  by the resurrection 73  from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord.

Romans 2:15

2:15 They 74  show that the work of the law is written 75  in their hearts, as their conscience bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or else defend 76  them, 77 

Romans 2:2

2:2 Now we know that God’s judgment is in accordance with truth 78  against those who practice such things.

Romans 1:13-14

1:13 I do not want you to be unaware, 79  brothers and sisters, 80  that I often intended to come to you (and was prevented until now), so that I may have some fruit even among you, just as I already have among the rest of the Gentiles. 81  1:14 I am a debtor 82  both to the Greeks and to the barbarians, both to the wise and to the foolish.

Romans 3:14

3:14Their mouths are 83  full of cursing and bitterness. 84 

Titus 1:9

1:9 He must hold firmly to the faithful message as it has been taught, 85  so that he will be able to give exhortation in such healthy teaching 86  and correct those who speak against it.

Revelation 3:3

3:3 Therefore, remember what you received and heard, 87  and obey it, 88  and repent. If you do not wake up, I will come like a thief, and you will never 89  know at what hour I will come against 90  you.

tn The sentence begins with the temporal indicator וַיְהִי (vayÿhi) followed by “in the days of.”

sn Shinar (also in v. 9) is the region of Babylonia.

tn Or “king of Goyim.” The Hebrew term גּוֹיִם (goyim) means “nations,” but a number of modern translations merely transliterate the Hebrew (cf. NEB “Goyim”; NIV, NRSV “Goiim”).

tn Heb “made war.”

sn On the geographical background of vv. 1-2 see J. P. Harland, “Sodom and Gomorrah,” The Biblical Archaeologist Reader, 1:41-75; and D. N. Freedman, “The Real Story of the Ebla Tablets, Ebla and the Cities of the Plain,” BA 41 (1978): 143-64.

tn Heb “all these,” referring only to the last five kings named. The referent has been specified as “these last five kings” in the translation for clarity.

tn The Hebrew verb used here means “to join together; to unite; to be allied.” It stresses close associations, especially of friendships, marriages, or treaties.

sn The Salt Sea is the older name for the Dead Sea.

tn The sentence simply begins with “twelve years”; it serves as an adverbial accusative giving the duration of their bondage.

10 tn This is another adverbial accusative of time.

11 sn The story serves as a foreshadowing of the plight of the kingdom of Israel later. Eastern powers came and forced the western kingdoms into submission. Each year, then, they would send tribute east – to keep them away. Here, in the thirteenth year, they refused to send the tribute (just as later Hezekiah rebelled against Assyria). And so in the fourteenth year the eastern powers came to put them down again. This account from Abram’s life taught future generations that God can give victory over such threats – that people did not have to live in servitude to tyrants from the east.

12 tn The Hebrew verb נָכָה (nakhah) means “to attack, to strike, to smite.” In this context it appears that the strike was successful, and so a translation of “defeated” is preferable.

13 sn The line of attack ran down the eastern side of the Jordan Valley into the desert, and then turned and came up the valley to the cities of the plain.

14 tn Heb “they returned and came to En Mishpat (that is, Kadesh).” The two verbs together form a verbal hendiadys, the first serving as the adverb: “they returned and came” means “they came again.” Most English translations do not treat this as a hendiadys, but translate “they turned back” or something similar. Since in the context, however, “came again to” does not simply refer to travel but an assault against the place, the present translation expresses this as “attacked…again.”

15 tn Heb “against.”

16 tn Or “Goyim.” See the note on the word “nations” in 14:1.

17 tn The Hebrew text has simply “against.” The word “fought” is supplied in the translation for stylistic reasons.

18 tn Heb “Now the Valley of Siddim [was] pits, pits of tar.” This parenthetical disjunctive clause emphasizes the abundance of tar pits in the area through repetition of the noun “pits.”

19 tn Or “they were defeated there.” After a verb of motion the Hebrew particle שָׁם (sham) with the directional heh (שָׁמָּה, shammah) can mean “into it, therein” (BDB 1027 s.v. שָׁם).

20 tn Heb “the rest.”

21 sn The reference to the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah must mean the kings along with their armies. Most of them were defeated in the valley, but some of them escaped to the hills.

22 tn Heb “they”; the referent (the four victorious kings, see v. 9) has been supplied in the translation for clarity.

23 tn Heb “Lot the son of his brother.”

24 tn Heb “and.”

25 tn Heb “he”; the referent (Lot) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

26 tn This disjunctive clause is circumstantial/causal, explaining that Lot was captured because he was living in Sodom at the time.

27 tn Heb “the fugitive.” The article carries a generic force or indicates that this fugitive is definite in the mind of the speaker.

28 sn E. A. Speiser (Genesis [AB], 103) suggests that part of this chapter came from an outside source since it refers to Abram the Hebrew. That is not impossible, given that the narrator likely utilized traditions and genealogies that had been collected and transmitted over the years. The meaning of the word “Hebrew” has proved elusive. It may be related to the verb “to cross over,” perhaps meaning “immigrant.” Or it might be derived from the name of Abram’s ancestor Eber (see Gen 11:14-16).

29 tn Or “terebinths.”

30 tn Or “a brother”; or “a relative”; or perhaps “an ally.”

31 tn Heb “possessors of a treaty with.” Since it is likely that the qualifying statement refers to all three (Mamre, Eshcol, and Aner) the words “all these” have been supplied in the translation to make this clear.

32 tn This parenthetical disjunctive clause explains how Abram came to be living in their territory, but it also explains why they must go to war with Abram.

33 tn Heb “his brother,” by extension, “relative.” Here and in v. 16 the more specific term “nephew” has been used in the translation for clarity. Lot was the son of Haran, Abram’s brother (Gen 11:27).

34 tn The verb וַיָּרֶק (vayyareq) is a rare form, probably related to the word רֵיק (req, “to be empty”). If so, it would be a very figurative use: “he emptied out” (or perhaps “unsheathed”) his men. The LXX has “mustered” (cf. NEB). E. A. Speiser (Genesis [AB], 103-4) suggests reading with the Samaritan Pentateuch a verb diq, cognate with Akkadian deku, “to mobilize” troops. If this view is accepted, one must assume that a confusion of the Hebrew letters ד (dalet) and ר (resh) led to the error in the traditional Hebrew text. These two letters are easily confused in all phases of ancient Hebrew script development. The present translation is based on this view.

35 tn The words “the invaders” have been supplied in the translation for clarification.

36 sn The use of the name Dan reflects a later perspective. The Danites did not migrate to this northern territory until centuries later (see Judg 18:29). Furthermore Dan was not even born until much later. By inserting this name a scribe has clarified the location of the region.

37 tn The Hebrew text simply has “night” as an adverbial accusative.

38 tn Heb “he”; the referent (Abram) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

39 tn Heb “he divided himself…he and his servants.”

40 tn Heb “left.” Directions in ancient Israel were given in relation to the east rather than the north.

41 tn The word “stolen” is supplied in the translation for clarification.

42 tn The phrase “the rest of “ has been supplied in the translation for clarification.

43 tn Heb “he”; the referent (Abram) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

44 tn Heb “him”; the referent (Abram) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

45 sn The King’s Valley is possibly a reference to what came to be known later as the Kidron Valley.

46 sn Salem is traditionally identified as the Jebusite stronghold of old Jerusalem. Accordingly, there has been much speculation about its king. Though some have identified him with the preincarnate Christ or with Noah’s son Shem, it is far more likely that Melchizedek was a Canaanite royal priest whom God used to renew the promise of the blessing to Abram, perhaps because Abram considered Melchizedek his spiritual superior. But Melchizedek remains an enigma. In a book filled with genealogical records he appears on the scene without a genealogy and then disappears from the narrative. In Psalm 110 the Lord declares that the Davidic king is a royal priest after the pattern of Melchizedek.

47 tn The parenthetical disjunctive clause significantly identifies Melchizedek as a priest as well as a king.

48 tn The preposition לְ (lamed) introduces the agent after the passive participle.

49 tn Some translate “possessor of heaven and earth” (cf. NASB). But cognate evidence from Ugaritic indicates that there were two homonymic roots ָקנָה (qanah), one meaning “to create” (as in Gen 4:1) and the other “to obtain, to acquire, to possess.” While “possessor” would fit here, “creator” is the more likely due to the collocation with “heaven and earth.”

50 tn The terms translated “heaven” and “earth” are both objective genitives after the participle in construct.

51 tn Heb “blessed be.” For God to be “blessed” means that is praised. His reputation is enriched in the world as his name is praised.

52 sn Who delivered. The Hebrew verb מִגֵּן (miggen, “delivered”) foreshadows the statement by God to Abram in Gen 15:1, “I am your shield” (מָגֵן, magen). Melchizedek provided a theological interpretation of Abram’s military victory.

53 tn Heb “him”; the referent (Melchizedek) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

54 tn Abram takes an oath, raising his hand as a solemn gesture. The translation understands the perfect tense as having an instantaneous nuance: “Here and now I raise my hand.”

55 tn The words “and vow” are not in the Hebrew text, but are supplied in the translation for clarification.

56 tn The oath formula is elliptical, reading simply: “…if I take.” It is as if Abram says, “[May the Lord deal with me] if I take,” meaning, “I will surely not take.” The positive oath would add the negative adverb and be the reverse: “[God will deal with me] if I do not take,” meaning, “I certainly will.”

57 tn The Hebrew text adds the independent pronoun (“I”) to the verb form for emphasis.

58 tn The words “I will take nothing” have been supplied in the translation for stylistic reasons.

59 tn Heb “except only what the young men have eaten.”

60 tn The Hebrew construction employs a cognate accusative, where the nominal object (“vegetation”) derives from the verbal root employed. It stresses the abundant productivity that God created.

61 sn After their kinds. The Hebrew word translated “kind” (מִין, min) indicates again that God was concerned with defining and dividing time, space, and species. The point is that creation was with order, as opposed to chaos. And what God created and distinguished with boundaries was not to be confused (see Lev 19:19 and Deut 22:9-11).

62 tn The conjunction “and” is not in the Hebrew text, but has been supplied in the translation to clarify the relationship of the clauses.

63 tn Grk “much in every way.”

64 tc ‡ Most witnesses (א A D2 33 Ï) have γάρ (gar) after μέν (men), though some significant Alexandrian and Western witnesses lack the conjunction (B D* G Ψ 81 365 1506 2464* pc latt). A few mss have γάρ, but not μέν (6 1739 1881). γάρ was frequently added by scribes as a clarifying conjunction, making it suspect here. NA27 has the γάρ in brackets, indicating doubt as to its authenticity.

65 tn Grk “they were.”

66 tn The referent of λόγια (logia, “oracles”) has been variously understood: (1) BDAG 598 s.v. λόγιον takes the term to refer here to “God’s promises to the Jews”; (2) some have taken this to refer more narrowly to the national promises of messianic salvation given to Israel (so S. L. Johnson, Jr., “Studies in Romans: Part VII: The Jews and the Oracles of God,” BSac 130 [1973]: 245); (3) perhaps the most widespread interpretation sees the term as referring to the entire OT generally.

67 tn Grk “much in every way.”

68 tc ‡ Most witnesses (א A D2 33 Ï) have γάρ (gar) after μέν (men), though some significant Alexandrian and Western witnesses lack the conjunction (B D* G Ψ 81 365 1506 2464* pc latt). A few mss have γάρ, but not μέν (6 1739 1881). γάρ was frequently added by scribes as a clarifying conjunction, making it suspect here. NA27 has the γάρ in brackets, indicating doubt as to its authenticity.

69 tn Grk “they were.”

70 tn The referent of λόγια (logia, “oracles”) has been variously understood: (1) BDAG 598 s.v. λόγιον takes the term to refer here to “God’s promises to the Jews”; (2) some have taken this to refer more narrowly to the national promises of messianic salvation given to Israel (so S. L. Johnson, Jr., “Studies in Romans: Part VII: The Jews and the Oracles of God,” BSac 130 [1973]: 245); (3) perhaps the most widespread interpretation sees the term as referring to the entire OT generally.

71 sn Appointed the Son-of-God-in-power. Most translations render the Greek participle ὁρισθέντος (Jorisqentos, from ὁρίζω, Jorizw) “declared” or “designated” in order to avoid the possible interpretation that Jesus was appointed the Son of God by the resurrection. However, the Greek term ὁρίζω is used eight times in the NT, and it always has the meaning “to determine, appoint.” Paul is not saying that Jesus was appointed the “Son of God by the resurrection” but “Son-of-God-in-power by the resurrection,” as indicated by the hyphenation. He was born in weakness in human flesh (with respect to the flesh, v. 3) and he was raised with power. This is similar to Matt 28:18 where Jesus told his disciples after the resurrection, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.”

72 tn Grk “spirit of holiness.” Some interpreters take the phrase to refer to Christ’s own inner spirit, which was characterized by holiness.

73 tn Or “by his resurrection.” Most interpreters see this as a reference to Jesus’ own resurrection, although some take it to refer to the general resurrection at the end of the age, of which Jesus’ resurrection is the first installment (cf. 1 Cor 15:23).

74 tn Grk “who.” The relative pronoun was converted to a personal pronoun and, because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started here in the translation.

75 tn Grk “show the work of the law [to be] written,” with the words in brackets implied by the Greek construction.

76 tn Or “excuse.”

77 tn Grk “their conscience bearing witness and between the thoughts accusing or also defending one another.”

78 tn Or “based on truth.”

79 sn The expression “I do not want you to be unaware [Grk ignorant]” also occurs in 1 Cor 10:1; 12:1; 1 Thess 4:13. Paul uses the phrase to signal that he is about to say something very important.

80 tn Grk “brothers,” but the Greek word may be used for “brothers and sisters” or “fellow Christians” as here (cf. BDAG 18 s.v. ἀδελφός 1, where considerable nonbiblical evidence for the plural ἀδελφοί [adelfoi] meaning “brothers and sisters” is cited).

81 tn Grk “in order that I might have some fruit also among you just as also among the rest of the Gentiles.”

82 tn Or “obligated.”

83 tn Grk “whose mouth is.” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started here in the translation.

84 sn A quotation from Ps 10:7.

85 tn Grk “the faithful message in accordance with the teaching” (referring to apostolic teaching).

86 tn Grk “the healthy teaching” (referring to what was just mentioned).

87 tn The expression πῶς εἴληφας καὶ ἤκουσας (pw" eilhfa" kai hkousa") probably refers to the initial instruction in the Christian life they had received and been taught; this included doctrine and ethical teaching.

88 tn Grk “keep it,” in the sense of obeying what they had initially been taught.

89 tn The negation here is with οὐ μή (ou mh, the strongest possible form of negation in Koine Greek).

90 tn Or “come on.”