11:36 “Then the king 19 will do as he pleases. He will exalt and magnify himself above every deity and he will utter presumptuous things against the God of gods. He will succeed until the time of 20 wrath is completed, for what has been decreed must occur. 21 11:37 He will not respect 22 the gods of his fathers – not even the god loved by women. 23 He will not respect any god; he will elevate himself above them all. 11:38 What he will honor is a god of fortresses – a god his fathers did not acknowledge he will honor with gold, silver, valuable stones, and treasured commodities.
1 tc The present translation reads יִשָׁטֵף (yishatef, passive) rather than the MT יִשְׁטוֹף (yishtof, active).
2 tn Heb “heart.” So also in v. 28.
3 tn Heb “speak.”
4 tn Heb “he”; the referent (the king of the north) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
5 sn The name Kittim has various designations in extra-biblical literature. It can refer to a location on the island of Cyprus, or more generally to the island itself, or it can be an inclusive term to refer to parts of the Mediterranean world that lay west of the Middle East (e.g., Rome). For ships of Kittim the Greek OT (LXX) has “Romans,” an interpretation followed by a few English versions (e.g., TEV). A number of times in the Dead Sea Scrolls the word is used in reference to the Romans. Other English versions are more generic: “[ships] of the western coastlands” (NIV, NLT); “from the west” (NCV, CEV).
6 sn This is apparently a reference to the Roman forces, led by Gaius Popilius Laenas, which confronted Antiochus when he came to Egypt and demanded that he withdraw or face the wrath of Rome. Antiochus wisely withdrew from Egypt, albeit in a state of bitter frustration.
7 tn Heb “show regard for.”
8 tn Heb “arms.”
9 tn Heb “the sanctuary, the fortress.”
10 tn Heb “will give.”
11 tn Or “corrupt.”
12 tn Heb “acted wickedly toward.”
13 tn Heb “know.” The term “know” sometimes means “to recognize.” In relational contexts it can have the connotation “recognize the authority of, be loyal to,” as it does here.
14 sn This is an allusion to the Maccabean revolt, which struggled to bring about Jewish independence in the second century
15 tn Heb “the many.”
16 tn Heb “stumble.”
17 tn Or “by burning.”
18 tn Heb “days.”
19 sn The identity of this king is problematic. If vv. 36-45 continue the description of Antiochus Epiphanes, the account must be viewed as erroneous, since the details do not match what is known of Antiochus’ latter days. Most modern scholars take this view, concluding that this section was written just shortly before the death of Antiochus and that the writer erred on several key points as he tried to predict what would follow the events of his own day. Conservative scholars, however, usually understand the reference to shift at this point to an eschatological figure, viz., the Antichrist. The chronological gap that this would presuppose to be in the narrative is not necessarily a problem, since by all accounts there are many chronological gaps throughout the chapter, as the historical figures intended by such expressions as “king of the north” and “king of the south” repeatedly shift.
20 tn The words “the time of” are added in the translation for clarification.
21 tn Heb “has been done.” The Hebrew verb used here is the perfect of certitude, emphasizing the certainty of fulfillment.
22 tn Heb “consider.”
23 tn Heb “[the one] desired by women.” The referent has been specified in the translation for clarity.