3:13 Then Nebuchadnezzar in a fit of rage 2 demanded that they bring 3 Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego before him. So they brought them 4 before the king.
1 tn Aram “those men”; the referent (the administrative officials who had earlier approached the king about the edict) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
2 tn Aram “in anger and wrath”; NASB “in rage and anger.” The expression is a hendiadys.
3 tn The Aramaic infinitive is active.
4 tn Aram “these men.” The pronoun is used in the translation to avoid undue repetition.
3 sn There is a great deal of uncertainty with regard to the specific nature of these items of clothing.
4 tn Aram “into the midst of the furnace.” For stylistic reasons the words “the midst of” have been left untranslated.
4 tn Aram “into the midst of the furnace.” For stylistic reasons the words “the midst of” have been left untranslated.
5 sn The deuterocanonical writings known as The Prayer of Azariah and The Song of the Three present at this point a confession and petition for God’s forgiveness and a celebration of God’s grace for the three Jewish youths in the fiery furnace. Though not found in the Hebrew/Aramaic text of Daniel, these compositions do appear in the ancient Greek versions.
5 tn Aram “were saying.”
6 tn Aram “unless we find [it] against him.”
6 tn Aram “caused to go up.”
7 tn The Aramaic verb is active.
8 tn Aram “the flame of the fire” (so KJV, ASV, NASB); NRSV “the raging flames.”
7 tn Aram “in their bodies.”
8 tn Aram “the fire did not have power.”
8 tc Theodotion lacks the words “came by collusion to the king and.”
9 tn Aram “the king.”
10 tn Aram “know”; NAB “Keep in mind”; NASB “Recognize”; NIV, NCV “Remember.”
9 tn Aram “said.”
10 tn Aram “had eaten the pieces of.” The Aramaic expression is ironic, in that the accusers who had figuratively “eaten the pieces of Daniel” are themselves literally devoured by the lions.
11 tn The Aramaic active impersonal verb is often used as a substitute for the passive.
12 tc The LXX specifies only the two overseers, together with their families, as those who were cast into the lions’ den.
10 sn Daniel’s absence from this scene has sparked the imagination of commentators, some of whom have suggested that perhaps he was unable to attend the dedication due to sickness or due to being away on business. Hippolytus supposed that Daniel may have been watching from a distance.