1 tn Heb “For” but this introduces a long explanation about the relative importance of sacrifice and obedience.
2 tn Verses 22-23a read in Hebrew, “I did not speak with your ancestors and I did not command them when I brought them out of Egypt about words/matters concerning burnt offering and sacrifice, but I commanded them this word:” Some modern commentators have explained this passage as an evidence for the lateness of the Pentateuchal instruction regarding sacrifice or a denial that sacrifice was practiced during the period of the wilderness wandering. However, it is better explained as an example of what R. de Vaux calls a dialectical negative, i.e., “not so much this as that” or “not this without that” (Ancient Israel, 454-56). For other examples of this same argument see Isa 1:10-17; Hos 6:4-6; Amos 5:21-25.
3 tn Heb “Obey me and I will be.” The translation is equivalent syntactically but brings out the emphasis in the command.
4 tn Heb “Walk in all the way that I command you.”
5 tn Heb “thus says the
6 tn Heb “by walking in my law which I set before you.”
7 tn See the translator’s note on 7:13 for the idiom here.
8 tn 26:4-6 are all one long sentence containing a long condition with subordinate clauses (vv. 4-5) and a compound consequence in v. 6: Heb “If you will not obey me by walking in my law…by paying attention to the words of the prophets which…and you did not pay heed, then I will make…and I will make…” The sentence has been broken down in conformity to contemporary English style but an attempt has been made to reflect all the subordinations in the English translation.
9 sn See the study note on Jer 7:13.