Daniel 7:8
Context7:8 “As I was contemplating the horns, another horn – a small one – came up between them, and three of the former horns were torn out by the roots to make room for it. 1 This horn had eyes resembling human eyes and a mouth speaking arrogant 2 things.
Jeremiah 12:15
Context12:15 But after I have uprooted the people of those nations, I will relent 3 and have pity on them. I will restore the people of each of those nations to their own lands 4 and to their own country.
Jeremiah 12:17
Context12:17 But I will completely uproot and destroy any of those nations that will not pay heed,’” 5 says the Lord.
Jeremiah 18:7
Context18:7 There are times, Jeremiah, 6 when I threaten to uproot, tear down, and destroy a nation or kingdom. 7
Jeremiah 31:40
Context31:40 The whole valley where dead bodies and sacrificial ashes are thrown 8 and all the terraced fields 9 out to the Kidron Valley 10 on the east as far north 11 as the Horse Gate 12 will be included within this city that is sacred to the Lord. 13 The city will never again be torn down or destroyed.”
Jeremiah 45:4
Context45:4 The Lord told Jeremiah, 14 “Tell Baruch, 15 ‘The Lord says, “I am about to tear down what I have built and to uproot what I have planted. I will do this throughout the whole earth. 16
[7:8] 1 tn Aram “were uprooted from before it.”
[7:8] 2 tn Aram “great.” So also in vv. 11, 20.
[12:15] 3 tn For the use of the verb “turn” (שׁוּב, shuv) in this sense, see BDB s.v. שׁוּב Qal.6.g and compare the usage in Pss 90:13; 6:4; Joel 2:14. It does not simply mean “again” as several of the English versions render it.
[12:15] 4 sn The
[12:17] 5 tn Heb “But if they will not listen, I will uproot that nation, uprooting and destroying.” IBHS 590-91 §35.3.2d is likely right in seeing the double infinitive construction here as an intensifying infinitive followed by an adverbial infinitive qualifying the goal of the main verb, “uproot it in such a way as to destroy it.” However, to translate that way “literally” would not be very idiomatic in contemporary English. The translation strives for the equivalent. Likewise, to translate using the conditional structure of the original seems to put the emphasis of the passage in its context on the wrong point.
[18:7] 6 tn The word “Jeremiah” is not in the text but it is implicit from the introduction in v. 5 that he is being addressed. It is important to see how the rhetoric of this passage is structured. The words of vv. 7-10 lead up to the conclusion “So now” in v. 11 which in turns leads to the conclusion “Therefore” in v. 13. The tense of the verb in v. 12 is very important. It is a vav consecutive perfect indicating the future (cf. GKC 333 §112.p, r); their response is predictable. The words of vv. 7-10 are addressed to Jeremiah (v. 5) in fulfillment of the
[18:7] 7 tn Heb “One moment I may speak about a nation or kingdom to…” So also in v. 9. The translation is structured this way to avoid an awkward English construction and to reflect the difference in disposition. The constructions are, however, the same.
[31:40] 8 sn It is generally agreed that this refers to the Hinnom Valley which was on the southwestern and southern side of the city. It was here where the people of Jerusalem had burned their children as sacrifices and where the
[31:40] 9 tc The translation here follows the Qere and a number of Hebrew
[31:40] 10 sn The Kidron Valley is the valley that joins the Hinnom Valley in the southeastern corner of the city and runs northward on the east side of the city.
[31:40] 11 tn The words “on the east” and “north” are not in the text but are supplied in the translation to give orientation.
[31:40] 12 sn The Horse Gate is mentioned in Neh 3:28 and is generally considered to have been located midway along the eastern wall just south of the temple area.
[31:40] 13 tn The words “will be included within this city that is” are not in the text. The text merely says that “The whole valley…will be sacred to the
[45:4] 14 tn The words, “The
[45:4] 15 tn Heb “Thus you shall say to him [i.e., Baruch].”
[45:4] 16 tn Heb “and this is with regard to the whole earth.” The feminine pronoun הִיא (hi’) at the end refers to the verbal concepts just mentioned, i.e., this process (cf. GKC 459 §144.b and compare the use of the feminine singular suffix in the same function GKC 440-41 §135.p). The particle אֶת (’et) is here functioning to introduce emphatically the object of the action (cf. BDB 85 s.v. I אֵת 3.α). There is some debate whether אֶרֶץ (’erets) here applies to the whole land of Israel or to the whole earth. However, the reference to “all mankind” (Heb “all flesh”) in the next verse as well as “anywhere you go” points to “the whole earth” as the referent.