Discovery BoxPsalms 25:10
Context25:10 The Lord always proves faithful and reliable 1
to those who follow the demands of his covenant. 2
Psalms 37:11
Context37:11 But the oppressed will possess the land
and enjoy great prosperity. 3
Psalms 119:165
Context119:165 Those who love your law are completely secure; 4
nothing causes them to stumble. 5
Isaiah 26:3
Context26:3 You keep completely safe the people who maintain their faith,
for they trust in you. 6
Isaiah 57:19
Context57:19 I am the one who gives them reason to celebrate. 7
Complete prosperity 8 is available both to those who are far away and those who are nearby,”
says the Lord, “and I will heal them.
Luke 1:79
Context1:79 to give light to those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, 9
to guide our feet into the way 10 of peace.”
Romans 5:1
Context5:1 11 Therefore, since we have been declared righteous by faith, we have 12 peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,
Philippians 4:8-9
Context4:8 Finally, brothers and sisters, 13 whatever is true, whatever is worthy of respect, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if something is excellent or praiseworthy, think about these things. 4:9 And what you learned and received and heard and saw in me, do these things. And the God of peace will be with you.
[25:10] 1 tn Heb “all the paths of the
[25:10] 2 tn Heb “to the ones who keep his covenant and his testimonies.”
[37:11] 3 tn Heb “and they will take delight in (see v. 4) abundance of peace.”
[119:165] 4 tn Heb “great peace [is] to the lovers of your law.”
[119:165] 5 tn Heb “and there is no stumbling to them.”
[26:3] 6 tn Heb “[one of] firm purpose you will keep [in] peace, peace, for in you he possesses trust.” The Hebrew term יֵצֶר (yetser) refers to what one devises in the mind; סָמוּךְ (samukh) probably functions here like an attributive adjective and carries the nuance “firm.” So the phrase literally means, “a firm purpose,” but as the object of the verb “keep, guard,” it must stand by metonymy for the one(s) who possess a firm purpose. In this context the “righteous nation” (v. 2) is probably in view and the “firm purpose” refers to their unwavering faith in God’s vindication (see 25:9). In this context שָׁלוֹם (shalom, “peace”), which is repeated for emphasis, likely refers to national security, not emotional or psychological composure (see vv. 1-2). The passive participle בָּטוּחַ (batuakh) expresses a state that results from the subject’s action.
[57:19] 7 tc The Hebrew text has literally, “one who creates fruit of lips.” Perhaps the pronoun אֲנִי (’ani) should be inserted after the participle; it may have been accidentally omitted by haplography: נוּב שְׂפָתָיִם[אֲנִי] בּוֹרֵא (bore’ [’ani] nuv sÿfatayim). “Fruit of the lips” is often understood as a metonymy for praise; perhaps it refers more generally to joyful shouts (see v. 18).
[57:19] 8 tn Heb “Peace, peace.” The repetition of the noun emphasizes degree.
[1:79] 9 sn On the phrases who sit in darkness…and…death see Isa 9:1-2; 42:7; 49:9-10.
[5:1] 11 sn Many interpreters see Rom 5:1 as beginning the second major division of the letter.
[5:1] 12 tc A number of important witnesses have the subjunctive ἔχωμεν (ecwmen, “let us have”) instead of ἔχομεν (ecomen, “we have”) in v. 1. Included in the subjunctive’s support are א* A B* C D K L 33 81 630 1175 1739* pm lat bo. But the indicative is not without its supporters: א1 B2 F G P Ψ 0220vid 104 365 1241 1505 1506 1739c 1881 2464 pm. If the problem were to be solved on an external basis only, the subjunctive would be preferred. Because of this, the “A” rating on behalf of the indicative in the UBS4 appears overly confident. Nevertheless, the indicative is probably correct. First, the earliest witness to Rom 5:1 has the indicative (0220vid, third century). Second, the first set of correctors is sometimes, if not often, of equal importance with the original hand. Hence, א1 might be given equal value with א*. Third, there is a good cross-section of witnesses for the indicative: Alexandrian (in 0220vid, probably א1 1241 1506 1881 al), Western (in F G), and Byzantine (noted in NA27 as pm). Thus, although the external evidence is strongly in favor of the subjunctive, the indicative is represented well enough that its ancestry could easily go back to the original. Turning to the internal evidence, the indicative gains much ground. (1) The variant may have been produced via an error of hearing (since omicron and omega were pronounced alike in ancient Greek). This, of course, does not indicate which reading was original – just that an error of hearing may have produced one of them. In light of the indecisiveness of the transcriptional evidence, intrinsic evidence could play a much larger role. This is indeed the case here. (2) The indicative fits well with the overall argument of the book to this point. Up until now, Paul has been establishing the “indicatives of the faith.” There is only one imperative (used rhetorically) and only one hortatory subjunctive (and this in a quotation within a diatribe) up till this point, while from ch. 6 on there are sixty-one imperatives and seven hortatory subjunctives. Clearly, an exhortation would be out of place in ch. 5. (3) Paul presupposes that the audience has peace with God (via reconciliation) in 5:10. This seems to assume the indicative in v. 1. (4) As C. E. B. Cranfield notes, “it would surely be strange for Paul, in such a carefully argued writing as this, to exhort his readers to enjoy or to guard a peace which he has not yet explicitly shown to be possessed by them” (Romans [ICC], 1:257). (5) The notion that εἰρήνην ἔχωμεν (eirhnhn ecwmen) can even naturally mean “enjoy peace” is problematic (ExSyn 464), yet those who embrace the subjunctive have to give the verb some such force. Thus, although the external evidence is stronger in support of the subjunctive, the internal evidence points to the indicative. Although a decision is difficult, ἔχομεν appears to be the authentic reading.
[4:8] 13 tn Grk “brothers.” See note on the phrase “brothers and sisters” in 1:12.
