John 6:56
Context6:56 The one who eats 1 my flesh and drinks my blood resides in me, and I in him. 2
John 14:10
Context14:10 Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father is in me? 3 The words that I say to you, I do not speak on my own initiative, 4 but the Father residing in me performs 5 his miraculous deeds. 6
John 14:23
Context14:23 Jesus replied, 7 “If anyone loves me, he will obey 8 my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and take up residence with him. 9
Romans 8:10-11
Context8:10 But if Christ is in you, your body is dead because of sin, but 10 the Spirit is your life 11 because of righteousness. 8:11 Moreover if the Spirit of the one 12 who raised Jesus from the dead lives in you, the one who raised Christ 13 from the dead will also make your mortal bodies alive through his Spirit who lives in you. 14
Romans 8:1
Context8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. 15
Colossians 1:1-2
Context1:1 From Paul, 16 an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and Timothy our brother, 1:2 to the saints, the faithful 17 brothers and sisters 18 in Christ, at Colossae. Grace and peace to you 19 from God our Father! 20
Colossians 1:21
Context1:21 And you were at one time strangers and enemies in your 21 minds 22 as expressed through 23 your evil deeds,
Galatians 3:28
Context3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave 24 nor free, there is neither male nor female 25 – for all of you are one in Christ Jesus.
Galatians 3:1
Context3:1 You 26 foolish Galatians! Who has cast a spell 27 on you? Before your eyes Jesus Christ was vividly portrayed 28 as crucified!
Galatians 1:3
Context1:3 Grace and peace to you 29 from God the Father and our 30 Lord Jesus Christ,
Galatians 1:1
Context1:1 From Paul, 31 an apostle (not from men, nor by human agency, but by Jesus Christ and God the Father who raised him from the dead)
Galatians 4:12-16
Context4:12 I beg you, brothers and sisters, 32 become like me, because I have become like you. You have done me no wrong!
4:13 But you know it was because of a physical illness that I first proclaimed the gospel to you, 4:14 and though my physical condition put you to the test, you did not despise or reject me. 33 Instead, you welcomed me as though I were an angel of God, 34 as though I were Christ Jesus himself! 35 4:15 Where then is your sense of happiness 36 now? For I testify about you that if it were possible, you would have pulled out your eyes and given them to me! 4:16 So then, have I become your enemy by telling you the truth? 37
[6:56] 1 tn Or “who chews.” On the alternation between ἐσθίω (esqiw, “eat,” v. 53) and τρώγω (trwgw, “eats,” vv. 54, 56, 58; “consumes,” v. 57) see the note on “eats” in v. 54.
[6:56] 2 sn Resides in me, and I in him. Note how in John 6:54 eating Jesus’ flesh and drinking his blood produces eternal life and the promise of resurrection at the last day. Here the same process of eating Jesus’ flesh and drinking his blood leads to a relationship of mutual indwelling (resides in me, and I in him). This suggests strongly that for the author (and for Jesus) the concepts of ‘possessing eternal life’ and of ‘residing in Jesus’ are virtually interchangeable.
[14:10] 3 tn The mutual interrelationship of the Father and the Son (ἐγὼ ἐν τῷ πατρὶ καὶ ὁ πατὴρ ἐν ἐμοί ἐστιν, egw en tw patri kai Jo pathr en emoi estin) is something that Jesus expected even his opponents to recognize (cf. John 10:38). The question Jesus asks of Philip (οὐ πιστεύεις, ou pisteuei") expects the answer “yes.” Note that the following statement is addressed to all the disciples, however, because the plural pronoun (ὑμῖν, Jumin) is used. Jesus says that his teaching (the words he spoke to them all) did not originate from himself, but the Father, who permanently remains (μένων, menwn) in relationship with Jesus, performs his works. One would have expected “speaks his words” here rather than “performs his works”; many of the church fathers (e.g., Augustine and Chrysostom) identified the two by saying that Jesus’ words were works. But there is an implicit contrast in the next verse between words and works, and v. 12 seems to demand that the works are real works, not just words. It is probably best to see the two terms as related but not identical; there is a progression in the idea here. Both Jesus’ words (recall the Samaritans’ response in John 4:42) and Jesus’ works are revelatory of who he is, but as the next verse indicates, works have greater confirmatory power than words.
[14:10] 4 tn Grk “I do not speak from myself.”
[14:10] 6 tn Or “his mighty acts”; Grk “his works.”
[14:23] 7 tn Grk “answered and said to him.”
[14:23] 9 tn Grk “we will come to him and will make our dwelling place with him.” The context here is individual rather than corporate indwelling, so the masculine singular pronoun has been retained throughout v. 23. It is important to note, however, that the pronoun is used generically here and refers equally to men, women, and children.
[8:10] 10 tn Greek emphasizes the contrast between these two clauses more than can be easily expressed in English.
[8:10] 11 tn Or “life-giving.” Grk “the Spirit is life.”
[8:11] 12 sn The one who raised Jesus from the dead refers to God (also in the following clause).
[8:11] 13 tc Several
[8:11] 14 tc Most
[8:1] 15 tc The earliest and best witnesses of the Alexandrian and Western texts, as well as a few others (א* B D* F G 6 1506 1739 1881 pc co), have no additional words for v. 1. Later scribes (A D1 Ψ 81 365 629 pc vg) added the words μὴ κατὰ σάρκα περιπατοῦσιν (mh kata sarka peripatousin, “who do not walk according to the flesh”), while even later ones (א2 D2 33vid Ï) added ἀλλὰ κατὰ πνεῦμα (alla kata pneuma, “but [who do walk] according to the Spirit”). Both the external evidence and the internal evidence are compelling for the shortest reading. The scribes were evidently motivated to add such qualifications (interpolated from v. 4) to insulate Paul’s gospel from charges that it was characterized too much by grace. The KJV follows the longest reading found in Ï.
[1:1] 16 tn Grk “Paul.” The word “from” is not in the Greek text, but has been supplied to indicate the sender of the letter.
[1:2] 17 tn Grk “and faithful.” The construction in Greek (as well as Paul’s style) suggests that the saints are identical to the faithful; hence, the καί (kai) is best left untranslated (cf. Eph 1:1). See ExSyn 281-82.
[1:2] 18 tn Grk “brothers,” but the Greek word may be used for “brothers and sisters” or “fellow Christians” as here (cf. BDAG 18 s.v. ἀδελφός 1, where considerable nonbiblical evidence for the plural ἀδελφοί [adelfoi] meaning “brothers and sisters” is cited).
[1:2] 19 tn Or “Grace to you and peace.”
[1:2] 20 tc Most witnesses, including some important ones (א A C F G I [P] 075 Ï it bo), read “and the Lord Jesus Christ” at the end of this verse, no doubt to conform the wording to the typical Pauline salutation. However, excellent and early witnesses (B D K L Ψ 33 81 1175 1505 1739 1881 al sa) lack this phrase. Since the omission is inexplicable as arising from the longer reading (otherwise, these
[1:21] 21 tn The article τῇ (th) has been translated as a possessive pronoun (ExSyn 215).
[1:21] 22 tn Although διανοία (dianoia) is singular in Greek, the previous plural noun ἐχθρούς (ecqrous) indicates that all those from Colossae are in view here.
[1:21] 23 tn The dative ἐν τοῖς ἔργοις τοῖς πονηροῖς (en toi" ergoi" toi" ponhroi") is taken as means, indicating the avenue through which hostility in the mind is revealed and made known.
[3:28] 24 tn See the note on the word “slave” in 1:10.
[3:28] 25 tn Grk “male and female.”
[3:1] 26 tn Grk “O” (an interjection used both in address and emotion). In context the following section is highly charged emotionally.
[3:1] 27 tn Or “deceived”; the verb βασκαίνω (baskainw) can be understood literally here in the sense of bewitching by black magic, but could also be understood figuratively to refer to an act of deception (see L&N 53.98 and 88.159).
[3:1] 28 tn Or “publicly placarded,” “set forth in a public proclamation” (BDAG 867 s.v. προγράφω 2).
[1:3] 29 tn Grk “Grace to you and peace.”
[1:3] 30 tc ‡ The unusual order καὶ κυρίου ἡμῶν (kai kuriou Jhmwn), which produces the reading “our Lord Jesus Christ” instead of “God our Father,” is read by Ì46,51vid B D F G H 1739 1881 Ï sy sa, while the more normal ἡμῶν καὶ κυρίου (Jhmwn kai kuriou) is found in א A P Ψ 33 81 326 365 2464 pc. Thus, the reading adopted in the translation is more widespread geographically and is found in the two earliest witnesses, along with several good representatives of the Alexandrian, Western, and Byzantine texttypes. Internally, there would be a strong motivation for scribes to change the order: “from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” is Paul’s normal greeting; here alone is the pronoun attached to “Jesus Christ” (except in the pastorals, though the greeting in these letters is nevertheless unlike the rest of the corpus Paulinum). Intrinsically, the chosen reading is superior as well: Scribes would be prone to emulate Paul’s regular style, while in an early letter such as this one his regular style was yet to be established (for a similar situation, cf. the text-critical discussion at 1 Thess 1:1). Hence, there is a strong probability that the reading in the translation is authentic. Although B. M. Metzger argues that “the apostle’s stereotyped formula was altered by copyists who, apparently in the interest of Christian piety, transferred the possessive pronoun so it would be more closely associated with ‘Lord Jesus Christ’” (TCGNT 520), one might expect to see the same alterations in other Pauline letters. That this is not the case argues for “our Lord Jesus Christ” as the authentic reading here.
[1:1] 31 tn Grk “Paul.” The word “from” is not in the Greek text, but has been supplied to indicate the sender of the letter.
[4:12] 32 tn Grk “brothers.” See note on the phrase “brothers and sisters” in 1:11.
[4:14] 33 tn Grk “your trial in my flesh you did not despise or reject.”
[4:14] 34 tn Or “the angel of God.” Linguistically, “angel of God” is the same in both testaments (and thus, he is either “an angel of God” or “the angel of God” in both testaments). For arguments and implications, see ExSyn 252; M. J. Davidson, “Angels,” DJG, 9; W. G. MacDonald argues for “an angel” in both testaments: “Christology and ‘The Angel of the Lord’,” Current Issues in Biblical and Patristic Interpretation, 324-35.
[4:14] 35 tn Grk “as an angel of God…as Christ Jesus.” This could be understood to mean either “you welcomed me like an angel of God would,” or “you welcomed me as though I were an angel of God.” In context only the second is accurate, so the translation has been phrased to indicate this.
[4:15] 36 tn Or “blessedness.”
[4:16] 37 tn Or “have I become your enemy because I am telling you the truth?” The participle ἀληθεύων (alhqeuwn) can be translated as a causal adverbial participle or as a participle of means (as in the translation).