Matthew 12:22
they brought <4374> [was.]
healed <2323> [he healed.]
blind <5185> [blind.]
Mark 1:25-27
rebuked <2008> [rebuked.]
After throwing ... into convulsions <4682> [torn.]
They were ... amazed <2284> [they were.]
<3754> [for.]
Mark 1:34
So ........... and ...... But he would ... permit <2532 863> [and suffered.]
to speak because <3754 2980> [speak, because they. or, say that they.]
Mark 5:8
Mark 9:25
he rebuked <2008> [he rebuked.]
Mute <216> [thou.]
If this had been only a natural disease, as some have contended, could our Lord with any propriety have thus addressed it? If the demoniacal possession had been false, or merely a vulgar error, would our Lord, the Revealer of truth, have thus established falsehood, sanctioned error, or encouraged deception, by teaching men to ascribe effects to the malice and power of evil spirits, which they had no agency in producing? Impossible! Such conduct is utterly unworthy the sacred character of the Redeemer.
I command <1473 2004> [I charge.]
Acts 19:13-16
itinerant <4022> [vagabond.]
exorcists <1845> [exorcists.]
tried to invoke <2021> [took.]
I sternly warn <3726> [adjure.]
