
Text -- 1 Chronicles 3:16 (NET)




Names, People and Places, Dictionary Themes and Topics



collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per phrase)
Wesley -> 1Ch 3:16
Wesley: 1Ch 3:16 - -- This was another Zedekiah. How seldom has a crown gone in a direct line, from father to son, as it did here, for seventeen generations! This was the r...
This was another Zedekiah. How seldom has a crown gone in a direct line, from father to son, as it did here, for seventeen generations! This was the recompense of David's piety. About the captivity the lineal descent was interrupted, and the crown went from a nephew to an uncle, a presage of the glory's departing from that house.
Clarke -> 1Ch 3:16
Clarke: 1Ch 3:16 - -- Zedekiah his son - If this be the same who was the last king of Judah, before the captivity, the word son must be taken here to signify successor; f...
Zedekiah his son - If this be the same who was the last king of Judah, before the captivity, the word son must be taken here to signify successor; for it is certain that Zedekiah was the successor of Jeconiah, and that Zedekiah was the son of Josiah, and not of Jehoiakim.
TSK -> 1Ch 3:16
TSK: 1Ch 3:16 - -- Jeconiah : 2Ki 24:6, 2Ki 24:8, 2Ki 25:27; 2Ch 36:9, Jehoiachin, Jer 22:24, Jer 22:28, Coniah, Mat 1:11, Jechonias
Zedekiah : As the sons of Jeconiah a...
Jeconiah : 2Ki 24:6, 2Ki 24:8, 2Ki 25:27; 2Ch 36:9, Jehoiachin, Jer 22:24, Jer 22:28, Coniah, Mat 1:11, Jechonias
Zedekiah : As the sons of Jeconiah are enumerated in the succeeding verse, and as Zedekiah is no where else mentioned as the son of Jeconiah, but as the son of Josiah, it is highly probable that son here means successor. 1Ch 3:15; 2Ki 24:17, being his uncle

collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per Verse)
Poole -> 1Ch 3:16
Poole: 1Ch 3:16 - -- Not his natural son, for he was his uncle, 2Ki 24:17 ; but his legal son, or his successor, upon whom the son’ s right was devolved by virtue o...
Not his natural son, for he was his uncle, 2Ki 24:17 ; but his legal son, or his successor, upon whom the son’ s right was devolved by virtue of that law, Num 27:8-10 , and therefore it is not strange if he have the name of
son with it. See Poole "Luk 3:1" . Or this was another Zedekiah; because it is improbable, and without example, that one and the same man should be twice mentioned in the same genealogy as the son of two several parents.
Haydock -> 1Ch 3:16
Haydock: 1Ch 3:16 - -- Jechonias, who is called also Joakim, (Worthington) and Cenias in Hebrew, Jeremias xxii. 28. (Calmet) ---
Both the son and the grandson of Josias g...
Jechonias, who is called also Joakim, (Worthington) and Cenias in Hebrew, Jeremias xxii. 28. (Calmet) ---
Both the son and the grandson of Josias go under the name of Jechonias, Matthew i. 11. (Barradius i. 5. 16.) (Menochius) ---
Sedecias. If this be the same with the king, was born must signify succeeded, as we know that Joakim was not the father of Sedecias. (Grotius, &c.)
Gill -> 1Ch 3:16
Gill: 1Ch 3:16 - -- And the sons of Jehoiakim; Jeconiah his son, Zedekiah his son. This is not the Zedekiah mentioned in the preceding verse; for he was not the son but t...
And the sons of Jehoiakim; Jeconiah his son, Zedekiah his son. This is not the Zedekiah mentioned in the preceding verse; for he was not the son but the uncle of Jeconiah, unless he should be called his son because he succeeded him in the kingdom; but he seems to be another of that name, nowhere else mentioned, and not the son of Jeconiah in any sense; he is not reckoned among them in the following verses, but of Jehoiakim.

expand allCommentary -- Verse Notes / Footnotes
