Text -- Leviticus 22:25 (NET)
Names, People and Places, Dictionary Themes and Topics
collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per phrase)
Wesley: Lev 22:25 - -- From proselytes: even from those, such should not be accepted, much less from the Israelites.
From proselytes: even from those, such should not be accepted, much less from the Israelites.
That is, the sacrifices.
Clarke -> Lev 22:25
Their corruption is in them - Viz., they are bruised, crushed, broken, etc.
Calvin -> Lev 22:25
Calvin: Lev 22:25 - -- 25.Neither from a stranger’s hand God here forbids that victims of this sort should be offered to Him, although they might be purchased from foreig...
25.Neither from a stranger’s hand God here forbids that victims of this sort should be offered to Him, although they might be purchased from foreigners. The Hebrews, however, has invented a different meaning, viz., that not even from foreigners were such sacrifices to be received, as it was unlawful for the children of the Church themselves to offer. But inasmuch as the Law altogether prohibited the unclean nations from making sacred oblations, another solution of this difficulty was still to be discovered. 295 They suppose, therefore, that those are called “strangers,” who observe the precepts of the children of Noah, i.e., who honor God, and do not pollute themselves by incest, abstain from the effusion of human blood, and from theft, and who do not worship idols. But the context does not accord with this, for Moses adds at the end that this kind of sacrifice would not be accepted by God from the Jews themselves, which will not agree with their being offered by the Gentiles. This, then, seems to me to be a confirmation of the previous injunction, introduced by way of precaution; for it might have seemed that the offering would have been permissible, if they had purchased the animal, even though it were defective; whereas God declares that what they were not allowed to present from their own stalls, was no more approved of by Him, if it had been purchased, because defectiveness is always displeasing to Him. Nor do I restrict this, as they do, to the foregoing clause, as if it only referred to castrated animals, and such as were wounded in the testicles, but I include with it also warts and eruptions, and other blemishes. In order that the prohibition may have more weight, he again calls the sacrifices “ the bread of God,” not because God, who is the fountain of life, has need of food, or eats of corruptible meat, since He is the eternal Spirit; but that men may more diligently take care duly to perform their sacred rites, wherein they familiarly draw nigh to God. Now, if no one would dare to present stale or corrupted food to an earthly prince, much less tolerable is it to contaminate God’s table with anything blemished.
TSK -> Lev 22:25
TSK: Lev 22:25 - -- a stranger’ s : Num 15:14-16, Num 16:40; Ezr 6:8-10
the bread : Lev 21:6, Lev 21:8, Lev 21:21, Lev 21:22; Mal 1:7, Mal 1:8, Mal 1:12-14
because :...
a stranger’ s : Num 15:14-16, Num 16:40; Ezr 6:8-10
the bread : Lev 21:6, Lev 21:8, Lev 21:21, Lev 21:22; Mal 1:7, Mal 1:8, Mal 1:12-14
collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per Verse)
Barnes -> Lev 22:25
Barnes: Lev 22:25 - -- A stranger’ s hand - The word here rendered "stranger", is not the same as that in Lev 22:10, Lev 22:18 : it means literally, "the son of ...
Poole -> Lev 22:25
Poole: Lev 22:25 - -- Neither from a stranger’ s hand to wit, from proselytes, from whom less might seem to be expected, and in whom God might bear with some things w...
Neither from a stranger’ s hand to wit, from proselytes, from whom less might seem to be expected, and in whom God might bear with some things which he would not bear with in his own people; yet even from those such should not be accepted, much less from the Israelites.
The bread i.e. the sacrifices. See on Lev 21:8 . Of any of these , i.e. corrupted or defective; which clause limits the sense and kinds of offerings, and cuts off another more general interpretation received by many, to wit, that he forbids the receiving of any offering, whether blemished or perfect, from the hands of a stranger remaining in heathenism.
Their corruption is in them i.e. they are corrupt, vicious, and unlawful sacrifices. For you , or, from you , O priests, to whom it belongs to offer. You shall bear the blame of it, for the strangers might do so through ignorance of God’ s law.
Haydock -> Lev 22:25
Haydock: Lev 22:25 - -- Bread, which always accompanies the sacrifices for sin. Holocausts might be offered by the Gentiles. (2 Machabees iii. 3.; 1 Esdras vi. 9.; Josephu...
Bread, which always accompanies the sacrifices for sin. Holocausts might be offered by the Gentiles. (2 Machabees iii. 3.; 1 Esdras vi. 9.; Josephus, Antiquities xviii. 7.; Selden, Jur. 3, 4, 7.) ---
Them. To reconcile this with ver. 18, we must understand because in the sense of in as much as; they are all corrupted, when contrary to these regulations. The strangers shall not be allowed to offer any blemished victim. Hebrew, "Neither from the hand of a stranger shall you offer the bread (or victims) of your God of any of these; because....blemishes are in them: they shall not be accepted (by God) for you (or them)." The Chaldean and other versions explain it in the same sense. Presents of gold, &c., were accepted, and kept in the temple. The family of Augustus shewed their generosity in this respect. (Philo, Legat.) (Calmet) ---
Strangers, or pagans, could not offer victims, but they might give money to purchase them. (Tirinus)
Gill -> Lev 22:25
Gill: Lev 22:25 - -- Neither from a stranger's hand shall ye offer the bread of your God of any of these,.... That is, from a Gentile, a proselyte of the gate, who had ren...
Neither from a stranger's hand shall ye offer the bread of your God of any of these,.... That is, from a Gentile, a proselyte of the gate, who had renounced idolatry, and was willing to offer sacrifice to the true God; but what had such defects and blemishes in them as before described the priest might not take of his hands, and offer on the altar of God; and this is the rather observed, because on the one hand the Gentile might think such sacrifices would be acceptable, since he might have been used to offer such to idols; and on the other hand, the priest might think such would do well enough for Gentiles, though not for Israelites:
because their corruption is in them; or they are corrupt through being bruised, crushed, broken, or cut:
and blemishes be in them; which seems to be added to explain the former, and may have respect to all the blemishes before named, and whatsoever is included in them; for though there are but here mentioned, the Jews reckon no less than fifty c:
they shall not be accepted for you; to make atonement for you; Jarchi says, or "from you", the priests; they shall not be accepted of the Lord from their hands, and so be of no avail to the offerers, nor to those for whom they are offered.