
Text -- Numbers 30:3 (NET)




Names, People and Places, Dictionary Themes and Topics



collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per phrase)
JFB -> Num 30:3
JFB: Num 30:3 - -- Girls only are specified; but minors of the other sex, who resided under the parental roof, were included, according to Jewish writers, who also consi...
Girls only are specified; but minors of the other sex, who resided under the parental roof, were included, according to Jewish writers, who also consider the name "father" as comprehending all guardians of youth. We are also told that the age at which young people were deemed capable of vowing was thirteen for boys and twelve for girls. The judgment of a father or guardian on the vow of any under his charge might be given either by an expressed approval or by silence, which was to be construed as approval. But in the case of a husband who, after silence from day to day, should ultimately disapprove or hinder his wife's vow, the sin of non-performance was to be imputed to him and not to her [Num 30:15].
Clarke -> Num 30:3
Clarke: Num 30:3 - -- In her youth - That is, say the rabbins, under twelve years of age; and under thirteen in case of a young man. Young persons of this age were consid...
In her youth - That is, say the rabbins, under twelve years of age; and under thirteen in case of a young man. Young persons of this age were considered to be under the authority of their parents, and had consequently no power to vow away the property of another. A married woman was in the same circumstances, because she was under the authority of her husband. If however the parents or the husband heard of the vow, and objected to it in the same day in which they heard of it, (Num 30:5), then the vow was annulled; or, if having heard of it, they held their peace, this was considered a ratification of the vow
A rash vow was never to be kept; "for,"says Philo, and common sense and justice say the same, "he who commits an unjust action because of his vow adds one crime to another
1. By making an unlawful vow
2. By doing an unlawful action."
Calvin -> Num 30:3
Calvin: Num 30:3 - -- 3.If a woman also vow He now proceeds to the point of which he proposed to treat, i.e., that vows made by persons who are not their own masters do ...
3.If a woman also vow He now proceeds to the point of which he proposed to treat, i.e., that vows made by persons who are not their own masters do not hold good; and he mentions two cases. For, in the first place, he teaches that if a daughter, whilst living with her father, has vowed anything without his knowledge, it is of no force. He lays down the same rule, if the father, hearing the vow, has disallowed it; but if he has held his peace, it is declared that his silence is equivalent to consent. Hence we gather that all those who are possessed of power do not do their duty unless they frankly and discreetly express their opposition whenever anything displeases them; since their connivance is a kind of tacit approbation. In the second place, he treats of married women, whose vows, made in the absence or with the disapproval of their husbands, he commands to be of none effect; but if the husbands have known of them, and been silent, he obliges their performance. For many deceptions might have thus arisen; since it is usual with many when they wish to gratify their wives, to conceal their opinion for the time, but, when the period of actual performance arrives, to elude what may have been promised. But unless they use their privilege in proper time, God would have them bear the punishment of their servile indulgence and dissimulation; but because women are often urged to deceive by their levity and inconstancy, this danger is also anticipated. It may also happen 326 that a woman, when subject to her husband, may make a vow in the precipitate fervor of her zeal, and when he is dead, may retract it under the specious pretext that she was not then free and her own mistress; the same thing may occur when a divorced woman shall bind herself, and then when she has married, shall appear to herself to be released. Since instances of this wicked change of mind are too frequent, no wonder that this special precaution should be added, to prevent frauds. Wherefore God declares that the period when the vow was made is to be considered, so that they are no less liable than as if their condition had remained the same. He therefore condemns to the performance of their vow those women who have been emancipated from their fathers’ authority by marriage, and also who have been set free by death or divorce; yet it appears from the last verse of the chapter, that two exceptions, modifying the general law, are here peculiarly treated of.

collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per Verse)
Barnes -> Num 30:3
Barnes: Num 30:3 - -- Being in her father’ s house in her youth - It was not ordinarily until her betrothal or marriage, that the female passed (some suppose by...
Being in her father’ s house in her youth - It was not ordinarily until her betrothal or marriage, that the female passed (some suppose by purchase) from the power of her father to that of her husband.
Poole -> Num 30:3
Poole: Num 30:3 - -- If a woman or a man in the same circumstances, a son or a servant, as plainly appears from hence, because the reason of this law is perfectly the sam...
If a woman or a man in the same circumstances, a son or a servant, as plainly appears from hence, because the reason of this law is perfectly the same in both sexes, which is, that such persons have given away what was not their own, but another’ s, even their superior’ s right, which is against the rule and law of natural reason, and against the word of God, which binds all persons to give to every one their due. He instanceth only in the woman, because that sex is both by creation and sin put into a state of subjection, but under the chief and most unquestionable kind all other subjects in like circumstances are comprehended, as is very usual.
Being in her father’ s house i.e. under his care, power, and government, which she is whilst she continues in her father’ s house , being a virgin, as appears by the opposition of a married woman, Num 30:6 , and of a widow, and divorced woman, Num 30:9 , and by this phrase of being in her father’ s house , for when she marries, she is removed into her husband’ s house, Rth 1:9 . Or, being in , or of her father’ s family , the word house being commonly used for family; for when she marries, she is translated and removed into another family.
In her youth when not only her sex, but her age, disenables her for vowing; and this clause is added not by way of restriction, as if’ virgins in their riper years were freed from their parents’ jurisdiction, and at their own disposal, (which undoubtedly they are not,) but by way of addition, or amplification, q.d. especially (which particle is here to be understood, such defects of particles being frequent in the Hebrew tongue) in her youth , which is commonly reckoned about her twelfth or thirteenth year.
Haydock -> Num 30:3
Haydock: Num 30:3 - -- Oath, to do something commendable, shall observe his promise, whether any body has heard him or not. The Rabbins pretend, that if the vow be not expr...
Oath, to do something commendable, shall observe his promise, whether any body has heard him or not. The Rabbins pretend, that if the vow be not expressed in words, it is not obligatory. But this is only true before men, who cannot subject their fellow creatures to punishment for internal faults. (Haydock) ---
The obligation of a vow or oath is founded upon common honesty, which requires that we should comply with our lawful promises; and, though all properly belong to God, yet, as he does not strictly require us to do every good work which may be in our power, we may, by vow, testify our desire to please and honour him the more. Some of the Rabbins have very loose sentiments with respect to vows, which they look upon as no better than building an altar, or immolating a victim upon the high places. It is sufficient, they say, to observe the law, apud Fagium. (Calmet) ---
Luther was desirous of introducing the same loose morality among Christians. But we need not ask, what the Rabbins said, or Luther, &c. But what does God and his Church assert? The Scripture repeatedly commends prudent vows; and those who can persuade themselves that they can infringe such solemn promises without offence, will be little solicitous about keeping their word to a fellow creature, unless when interest, or fear of shame, force them to do it. (Haydock) ---
He who makes a vow to abstain from any thing lawful, would be guilty of sin if he should observe it afterwards. (St. Augustine, q. 56.) (Worthington)
Gill -> Num 30:3
Gill: Num 30:3 - -- If a woman also vow a vow unto the Lord,.... Who has not passed thirteen years, as the Targum of Jonathan:
and bind herself by a bond; lay hersel...
If a woman also vow a vow unto the Lord,.... Who has not passed thirteen years, as the Targum of Jonathan:
and bind herself by a bond; lay herself under obligation to perform her vow by an oath: being in her father's house; unto the twelfth year, as the same Targum; that is, that is under his care, tuition, and jurisdiction, whether she literally, or properly speaking, is in the house or no at the time she vows; so Jarchi interprets it of her being in the power of her father, though not in his house, she being not at age to be at her own disposal, but at his: wherefore it is added:
in her youth; which, as the same writer explains it, signifies that she is"neither a little one, nor at age; for a little one's vow is no vow, and one at age is not in the power of her father to make void her vow: who is a little one? our Rabbins say, one of eleven years of age and one day, her vows are examined, whether she knows on whose account she vows and consecrates, or devotes anything; one vows a vow that is twelve years and one day old, there is no need to examine them.''He seems to refer to a passage in the Misnah t,"a daughter of eleven years and one day, her vows are examined; a daughter of twelve years and one day, her vows are firm, but they are to be examined through the whole twelfth year.''

expand allCommentary -- Verse Notes / Footnotes

expand allCommentary -- Verse Range Notes
TSK Synopsis -> Num 30:1-16
TSK Synopsis: Num 30:1-16 - --1 Vows are not to be broken.3 The exceptions of a maid's vows;6 of a wife's;9 of a widow's; or her that is divorced.
MHCC -> Num 30:3-16
MHCC: Num 30:3-16 - --Two cases of vows are determined. The case of a daughter in her father's house. When her vow comes to his knowledge, it is in his power either to conf...
Matthew Henry -> Num 30:3-16
Matthew Henry: Num 30:3-16 - -- It is here taken for granted that all such persons as are sui juris - at their own disposal, and are likewise of sound understanding and memory...
Keil-Delitzsch -> Num 30:3-15
Keil-Delitzsch: Num 30:3-15 - --
Num 30:3-15 contain the rules relating to positive and negative vows made by a woman, and four different examples are given. The first case (Num 30:...
Constable: Num 26:1--36:13 - --II. Prospects of the younger generation in the land chs. 26--36
The focus of Numbers now changes from the older ...

Constable: Num 26:1--32:42 - --A. Preparations for entering the Promised Land from the east chs. 26-32
The first section of this second...

Constable: Num 27:1--30:16 - --2. Provisions and commands to observe in preparation for entering the land chs. 27-30
"Just as t...
