
Text -- Numbers 36:1 (NET)




Names, People and Places, Dictionary Themes and Topics



collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per phrase)
JFB -> Num 36:1
JFB: Num 36:1 - -- Being the tribal governors in Manasseh, they consulted Moses on a case that affected the public honor and interests of their tribe. It related once mo...
Being the tribal governors in Manasseh, they consulted Moses on a case that affected the public honor and interests of their tribe. It related once more to the daughters of Zelophehad. Formerly they had applied, at their own instance, to be recognized, for want of male heirs in their family, as entitled to inherit their father's property [Num 27:1-11]; now the application was made on behalf of the tribe to which they belonged--that steps might be taken to prevent the alienation of their patrimony by their alliance with husbands of another tribe. The unrestricted marriages of daughters in such circumstances threatened seriously to affect the tenure of land in Israel, as their inheritance would go to their children, who, by the father's side, would belong to another tribe, and thus lead, through a complication of interests and the confusion of families, to an evil for which even the Jubilee could not afford a remedy. [See on Lev 25:13].
Calvin -> Num 36:1
Calvin: Num 36:1 - -- 1.And the chief fathers of the families It might appear strange that God had given an imperfect law with reference to succession, as if what will be ...
1.And the chief fathers of the families It might appear strange that God had given an imperfect law with reference to succession, as if what will be now stated had not occurred to His mind until Moses was reminded by the chief men of the families (of Machir,) 201 that it was unjust that the inheritances should be alienated, which would have been the case if the daughters of Zelophehad had married into other tribes, whereas their portion had fallen in the lot of the tribe of Manasseh. For whatever fell into the hands of those of another tribe, was a diminution of that lot. As, therefore, God had lately made provision for preserving the rights of individuals, He now treats of the general advantage or loss. What, then, can be the meaning of the objection, that God only half considered what was right? In my opinion, He so arranged His replies, that only when inquired of He assigned to each one his rights. The daughters of Zelophehad come, and demand justice of Moses and the elders, and God complies with their prayers. Now the heads of the tribe come, and agitate the question respecting the loss they would incur by the alienation of the inheritances; and it is then provided that other tribes should not be enriched by their loss. In short, whereas God might have spontaneously anticipated this, He preferred to grant it at the request of those who asked nothing but what was just and equitable. For it cannot be said that in this case it happened, as it often does, that, whilst every one pertinaciously maintains his own cause, and is eager to advance his own interests, one question arises out of another; for, when God has taken cognizance of the case, He pronounces that both parties only demanded what was right. It follows, therefore, that God designedly withheld His decisions until they naturally arose out of the circumstances of the case. It is a common saying that the law makes no provision for those things which rarely occur. 202 Thus it would have been commonly supposed that this law was superfluous; and especially it would have detracted somewhat from the authority of his teaching, if Moses had treated of this trifling matter, had not circumstances led to it. In fine, God allowed Himself to be interrogated familiarly with respect to doubtful points of no primary importance, in order that posterity might recognize His reply as a proof of His fatherly indulgence. Meanwhile, let us bear in mind that if heavenly things are the subject of as much anxiety to us, as earthly things were to the children of Manasseh, the rule that we should observe will always be made clear to us.
TSK -> Num 36:1
Gilead : Num 26:29-33, Num 27:1; Jos 17:2, Jos 17:3; 1Ch 7:14-16

collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per Verse)
Barnes -> Num 36:1-13
Barnes: Num 36:1-13 - -- The daughters of Zelophehad had obtained an ordinance Num 28:6-11 which permitted the daughters of an Israelite dying without male issue to inherit ...
The daughters of Zelophehad had obtained an ordinance Num 28:6-11 which permitted the daughters of an Israelite dying without male issue to inherit their father’ s property. The chiefs of the Machirites, of whom Zelophehad had been one, now obtain a supplemental enactment, directing that heiresses should marry within their own tribe.
Be taken away - i. e. be permanently taken away. The jubilee year, by not restoring the estate to the tribe to which it originally belonged, would in effect confirm the alienation.
Unto their father’ s brothers’ sons - Or more generally, "unto the sons of their kinsmen."
rdrb \brdrs \brdrw30 \brsp20
Poole -> Num 36:1
Poole: Num 36:1 - -- The chief fathers of the families who had the care and management of the public affairs of that tribe committed to them.
The chief fathers of the families who had the care and management of the public affairs of that tribe committed to them.
Haydock -> Num 36:1
Haydock: Num 36:1 - -- Galaad. The descendants of Machir, who were settled in Galaad, were particularly interested, in knowing how their female relations of the house of S...
Galaad. The descendants of Machir, who were settled in Galaad, were particularly interested, in knowing how their female relations of the house of Salphaad, were to dispose of their fortunes, which God had allowed them. They knew that, by the law, their husbands would obtain possession; and if those husbands should be of another tribe, part of the land allotted to Manasses might be lost. See chap. xxvii., and Josue xvii. 1, 3.
Gill -> Num 36:1
Gill: Num 36:1 - -- And the chief fathers of the families of the children of Gilead,.... The princes, as Aben Ezra; so the Septuagint version, which was the tribe of Mana...
And the chief fathers of the families of the children of Gilead,.... The princes, as Aben Ezra; so the Septuagint version, which was the tribe of Manasseh, whose grandson Gilead was, as follows:
the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh of the families of the sons of Joseph, came near; to the house of judgment, as the Targum of Jonathan, the sanhedrim or court of judicature, consisting of the following persons:
and spoke before Moses; the Septuagint version adds, "and before Eleazar the priest", as in Num 27:2.
and before the princes, the chief fathers of the children of Israel: the princes of the several tribes; or it may be rather the seventy elders.

expand allCommentary -- Verse Notes / Footnotes

expand allCommentary -- Verse Range Notes
TSK Synopsis -> Num 36:1-13
TSK Synopsis: Num 36:1-13 - --1 The inconvenience of the inheritance of daughters is remedied by marrying in their own tribes,7 lest the inheritance should be removed from the trib...
MHCC -> Num 36:1-4
MHCC: Num 36:1-4 - --The heads of the tribe of Manasseh represent the evil which might follow, if the daughters of Zelophehad should marry into any other tribes. They soug...
Matthew Henry -> Num 36:1-4
Matthew Henry: Num 36:1-4 - -- We have here the humble address which the heads of the tribe of Manasseh made to Moses and the princes, on occasion of the order lately made concern...
Keil-Delitzsch -> Num 36:1-3
Keil-Delitzsch: Num 36:1-3 - --
The occasion for this law was a representation made to Moses and the princes of the congregation by the heads of the fathers' houses ( האבות fo...
Constable: Num 26:1--36:13 - --II. Prospects of the younger generation in the land chs. 26--36
The focus of Numbers now changes from the older ...

Constable: Num 33:1--36:13 - --B. Warning and encouragement of the younger generation chs. 33-36
God gave the final laws governing Isra...

Constable: Num 33:50--Deu 1:1 - --2. Anticipation of the Promised Land 33:50-36:13
"The section breaks down into two groups of thr...
