NETBible KJV GRK-HEB XRef Names Arts Hymns

  Discovery Box

1 Kings 10:1-2

Context
Solomon Entertains a Queen

10:1 When the queen of Sheba heard about Solomon, 1  she came to challenge 2  him with difficult questions. 3  10:2 She arrived in Jerusalem 4  with a great display of pomp, 5  bringing with her camels carrying spices, 6  a very large quantity of gold, and precious gems. She visited Solomon and discussed with him everything that was on her mind.

Exodus 18:8-12

Context
18:8 Moses told his father-in-law all that the Lord had done to Pharaoh and to Egypt for Israel’s sake, and all the hardship 7  that had come on them 8  along the way, and how 9  the Lord had delivered them.

18:9 Jethro rejoiced 10  because of all the good that the Lord had done for Israel, whom he had delivered from the hand of Egypt. 18:10 Jethro said, “Blessed 11  be the Lord who has delivered you from the hand of Egypt, and from the hand of Pharaoh, who has delivered the people from the Egyptians’ control! 12  18:11 Now I know that the Lord is greater than all the gods, for in the thing in which they dealt proudly against them he has destroyed them.” 13  18:12 Then Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, brought 14  a burnt offering and sacrifices for God, 15  and Aaron and all the elders of Israel came to eat food 16  with the father-in-law of Moses before God.

Exodus 18:2

Context

18:2 Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, took Moses’ wife Zipporah after he had sent her back,

Exodus 5:1-7

Context
Opposition to the Plan of God

5:1 17 Afterward Moses and Aaron went to Pharaoh and said, “Thus says the Lord, 18  the God of Israel, ‘Release 19  my people so that they may hold a pilgrim feast 20  to me in the desert.’” 5:2 But Pharaoh said, “Who is the Lord 21  that 22  I should obey him 23  by releasing 24  Israel? I do not know the Lord, 25  and I will not release Israel!” 5:3 And they said, “The God of the Hebrews has met with us. Let us go a three-day journey 26  into the desert so that we may sacrifice 27  to the Lord our God, so that he does not strike us with plague or the sword.” 28  5:4 The king of Egypt said to them, “Moses and Aaron, why do you cause the people to refrain from their work? 29  Return to your labor!” 5:5 Pharaoh was thinking, 30  “The people of the land are now many, and you are giving them rest from their labor.”

5:6 That same day Pharaoh commanded 31  the slave masters and foremen 32  who were 33  over the people: 34  5:7 “You must no longer 35  give straw to the people for making bricks 36  as before. 37  Let them go 38  and collect straw for themselves.

Exodus 5:16-17

Context
5:16 No straw is given to your servants, but we are told, 39  ‘Make bricks!’ Your servants are even 40  being beaten, but the fault 41  is with your people.”

5:17 But Pharaoh replied, 42  “You are slackers! Slackers! 43  That is why you are saying, ‘Let us go sacrifice to the Lord.’

Isaiah 60:1-10

Context
Zion’s Future Splendor

60:1 “Arise! Shine! For your light arrives!

The splendor 44  of the Lord shines on you!

60:2 For, look, darkness covers the earth

and deep darkness covers 45  the nations,

but the Lord shines on you;

his splendor 46  appears over you.

60:3 Nations come to your light,

kings to your bright light.

60:4 Look all around you! 47 

They all gather and come to you –

your sons come from far away

and your daughters are escorted by guardians.

60:5 Then you will look and smile, 48 

you will be excited and your heart will swell with pride. 49 

For the riches of distant lands 50  will belong to you

and the wealth of nations will come to you.

60:6 Camel caravans will cover your roads, 51 

young camels from Midian and Ephah.

All the merchants of Sheba 52  will come,

bringing gold and incense

and singing praises to the Lord. 53 

60:7 All the sheep of Kedar will be gathered to you;

the rams of Nebaioth will be available to you as sacrifices. 54 

They will go up on my altar acceptably, 55 

and I will bestow honor on my majestic temple.

60:8 Who are these who float along 56  like a cloud,

who fly like doves to their shelters? 57 

60:9 Indeed, the coastlands 58  look eagerly for me,

the large ships 59  are in the lead,

bringing your sons from far away,

along with their silver and gold,

to honor the Lord your God, 60 

the Holy One of Israel, 61  for he has bestowed honor on you.

60:10 Foreigners will rebuild your walls;

their kings will serve you.

Even though I struck you down in my anger,

I will restore my favor and have compassion on you. 62 

Matthew 2:1

Context
The Visit of the Wise Men

2:1 After Jesus was born in Bethlehem 63  in Judea, in the time 64  of King Herod, 65  wise men 66  from the East came to Jerusalem 67 

Matthew 12:42

Context
12:42 The queen of the South 68  will rise up at the judgment with this generation and condemn it, because she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon – and now, 69  something greater than Solomon is here!

Acts 8:27-40

Context
8:27 So 70  he got up 71  and went. There 72  he met 73  an Ethiopian eunuch, 74  a court official of Candace, 75  queen of the Ethiopians, who was in charge of all her treasury. He 76  had come to Jerusalem to worship, 77  8:28 and was returning home, sitting 78  in his chariot, reading 79  the prophet Isaiah. 8:29 Then the Spirit said to Philip, “Go over and join this chariot.” 8:30 So Philip ran up 80  to it 81  and heard the man 82  reading Isaiah the prophet. He 83  asked him, 84  “Do you understand what you’re reading?” 8:31 The man 85  replied, “How in the world can I, 86  unless someone guides me?” So he invited Philip to come up and sit with him. 8:32 Now the passage of scripture the man 87  was reading was this:

He was led like a sheep to slaughter,

and like a lamb before its shearer is silent,

so he did 88  not open his mouth.

8:33 In humiliation 89  justice was taken from him. 90 

Who can describe his posterity? 91 

For his life was taken away 92  from the earth. 93 

8:34 Then the eunuch said 94  to Philip, “Please tell me, 95  who is the prophet saying this about – himself or someone else?” 96  8:35 So Philip started speaking, 97  and beginning with this scripture 98  proclaimed the good news about Jesus to him. 8:36 Now as they were going along the road, they came to some water, and the eunuch said, “Look, there is water! What is to stop me 99  from being baptized?” 8:37 [[EMPTY]] 100  8:38 So he ordered the chariot to stop, and both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, 101  and Philip baptized 102  him. 8:39 Now when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord snatched Philip away, and the eunuch did not see him any more, but 103  went on his way rejoicing. 104  8:40 Philip, however, found himself 105  at Azotus, 106  and as he passed through the area, 107  he proclaimed the good news 108  to all the towns 109  until he came to Caesarea. 110 

Drag to resizeDrag to resize

[10:1]  1 tn Heb “the report about Solomon.” The Hebrew text also has, “to the name of the Lord,” which fits very awkwardly in the sentence. If retained, perhaps it should be translated, “because of the reputation of the Lord.” The phrase, which is omitted in the parallel passage in 2 Chr 9:1, may be an addition based on the queen’s declaration of praise to the Lord in v. 9.

[10:1]  2 tn Or “test.”

[10:1]  3 tn Or “riddles.”

[10:2]  4 map For location see Map5 B1; Map6 F3; Map7 E2; Map8 F2; Map10 B3; JP1 F4; JP2 F4; JP3 F4; JP4 F4.

[10:2]  5 tn Heb “with very great strength.” The Hebrew term חַיִל (khayil, “strength”) may refer here to the size of her retinue (cf. NAB, NASB, NIV, NRSV) or to the great wealth she brought with her.

[10:2]  6 tn Or “balsam oil.”

[18:8]  7 tn A rare word, “weariness” of the hardships.

[18:8]  8 tn Heb “found them.”

[18:8]  9 tn Here “how” has been supplied.

[18:9]  10 tn The word חָדָה (khada) is rare, occurring only in Job 3:6 and Ps 21:6, although it is common in Aramaic. The LXX translated it “he shuddered.” U. Cassuto suggests that that rendering was based on the midrashic interpretation in b. Sanhedrin 94b, “he felt cuts in his body” – a wordplay on the verb (Exodus, 215-16).

[18:10]  11 tn This is a common form of praise. The verb בָּרוּךְ (barukh) is the Qal passive participle of the verb. Here must be supplied a jussive, making this participle the predicate: “May Yahweh be blessed.” The verb essentially means “to enrich”; in praise it would mean that he would be enriched by the praises of the people.

[18:10]  12 tn Heb “from under the hand of the Egyptians.”

[18:11]  13 tn The end of this sentence seems not to have been finished, or it is very elliptical. In the present translation the phrase “he has destroyed them” is supplied. Others take the last prepositional phrase to be the completion and supply only a verb: “[he was] above them.” U. Cassuto (Exodus, 216) takes the word “gods” to be the subject of the verb “act proudly,” giving the sense of “precisely (כִּי, ki) in respect of these things of which the gods of Egypt boasted – He is greater than they (עֲלֵיהֶם, ‘alehem).” He suggests rendering the clause, “excelling them in the very things to which they laid claim.”

[18:12]  14 tn The verb is “and he took” (cf. KJV, ASV, NASB). It must have the sense of getting the animals for the sacrifice. The Syriac, Targum, and Vulgate have “offered.” But Cody argues because of the precise wording in the text Jethro did not offer the sacrifices but received them (A. Cody, “Exodus 18,12: Jethro Accepts a Covenant with the Israelites,” Bib 49 [1968]: 159-61).

[18:12]  15 sn Jethro brought offerings as if he were the one who had been delivered. The “burnt offering” is singular, to honor God first. The other sacrifices were intended for the invited guests to eat (a forerunner of the peace offering). See B. Jacob, Exodus, 498.

[18:12]  16 tn The word לֶחֶם (lekhem) here means the sacrifice and all the foods that were offered with it. The eating before God was part of covenantal ritual, for it signified that they were in communion with the Deity, and with one another.

[5:1]  17 sn The enthusiasm of the worshipers in the preceding chapter turns sour in this one when Pharaoh refuses to cooperate. The point is clear that when the people of God attempt to devote their full service and allegiance to God, they encounter opposition from the world. Rather than finding instant blessing and peace, they find conflict. This is the theme that will continue through the plague narratives. But what makes chapter 5 especially interesting is how the people reacted to this opposition. The chapter has three sections: first, the confrontation between Moses and Pharaoh (vv. 1-5); then the report of the stern opposition of the king (vv. 6-14); and finally, the sad account of the effect of this opposition on the people (vv. 15-21).

[5:1]  18 tn Heb “Yahweh.”

[5:1]  19 tn The form שַׁלַּח (shallakh), the Piel imperative, has been traditionally translated “let [my people] go.” The Qal would be “send”; so the Piel “send away, release, dismiss, discharge.” B. Jacob observes, “If a person was dismissed through the use of this verb, then he ceased to be within the power or sphere of influence of the individual who had dismissed him. He was completely free and subsequently acted entirely on his own responsibility” (Exodus, 115).

[5:1]  20 tn The verb חָגַג (khagag) means to hold a feast or to go on a pilgrim feast. The Arabic cognate of the noun form is haj, best known for the pilgrim flight of Mohammed, the hajira. The form in the text (וְיָחֹגּוּ, vÿyakhoggu) is subordinated to the imperative and thus shows the purpose of the imperative.

[5:2]  21 tn Heb “Yahweh.” This is a rhetorical question, expressing doubt or indignation or simply a negative thought that Yahweh is nothing (see erotesis in E. W. Bullinger, Figures of Speech, 944-45). Pharaoh is not asking for information (cf. 1 Sam 25:5-10).

[5:2]  22 tn The relative pronoun introduces the consecutive clause that depends on the interrogative clause (see GKC 318-19 §107.u).

[5:2]  23 tn The imperfect tense here receives the classification of obligatory imperfect. The verb שָׁמַע (shama’) followed by “in the voice of” is idiomatic; rather than referring to simple audition – “that I should hear his voice” – it conveys the thought of listening that issues in action – “that I should obey him.”

[5:2]  24 tn The Piel infinitive construct here has the epexegetical usage with lamed (ל); it explains the verb “obey.”

[5:2]  25 sn This absolute statement of Pharaoh is part of a motif that will develop throughout the conflict. For Pharaoh, the Lord (Yahweh) did not exist. So he said “I do not know the Lord [i.e., Yahweh].” The point of the plagues and the exodus will be “that he might know.” Pharaoh will come to know this Yahweh, but not in any pleasant way.

[5:3]  26 tn The word “journey” is an adverbial accusative telling the distance that Moses wanted the people to go. It is qualified by “three days.” It is not saying that they will be gone three days, but that they will go a distance that will take three days to cover (see Gen 31:22-23; Num 10:33; 33:8).

[5:3]  27 tn The purpose clause here is formed with a second cohortative joined with a vav (ו): “let us go…and let us sacrifice.” The purpose of the going was to sacrifice.

[5:3]  28 sn The last clause of this verse is rather unexpected here: “lest he meet [afflict] us with pestilence or sword.” To fail to comply with the summons of one’s God was to invite such calamities. The Law would later incorporate many such things as the curses for disobedience. Moses is indicating to Pharaoh that there is more reason to fear Yahweh than Pharaoh.

[5:4]  29 sn The clause is a rhetorical question. Pharaoh is not asking them why they do this, but rather is accusing them of doing it. He suspects their request is an attempt to get people time away from their labor. In Pharaoh’s opinion, Moses and Aaron were “removing the restraint” (פָּרַע, para’) of the people in an effort to give them rest. Ironically, under the Law the people would be expected to cease their labor when they went to appear before God. He would give them the rest that Pharaoh refused to give. It should be noted also that it was not Israel who doubted that Yahweh had sent Moses, as Moses had feared – but rather Pharaoh.

[5:5]  30 tn Heb “And Pharaoh said.” This is not the kind of thing that Pharaoh is likely to have said to Moses, and so it probably is what he thought or reasoned within himself. Other passages (like Exod 2:14; 3:3) show that the verb “said” can do this. (See U. Cassuto, Exodus, 67.)

[5:6]  31 tn Heb “and Pharaoh commanded on that day.”

[5:6]  32 tn The Greek has “scribes” for this word, perhaps thinking of those lesser officials as keeping records of the slaves and the bricks.

[5:6]  33 tn The phrase “who were” is supplied for clarity.

[5:6]  34 sn In vv. 6-14 the second section of the chapter describes the severe measures by the king to increase the labor by decreasing the material. The emphasis in this section must be on the harsh treatment of the people and Pharaoh’s reason for it – he accuses them of idleness because they want to go and worship. The real reason, of course, is that he wants to discredit Moses (v. 9) and keep the people as slaves.

[5:7]  35 tn The construction is a verbal hendiadys: לֹא תֹאסִפוּן לָתֵת (lotosifun latet, “you must not add to give”). The imperfect tense acts adverbially, and the infinitive becomes the main verb of the clause: “you must no longer give.”

[5:7]  36 tn The expression “for making bricks” is made of the infinitive construct followed by its cognate accusative: לִלְבֹּן הַלְּבֵנִים (lilbon hallÿvenim).

[5:7]  37 tn Heb “as yesterday and three days ago” or “as yesterday and before that.” This is idiomatic for “as previously” or “as in the past.”

[5:7]  38 tn The jussive יֵלְכוּ (yelÿkhu) and its following sequential verb would have the force of decree and not permission or advice. He is telling them to go and find straw or stubble for the bricks.

[5:16]  39 tn Heb “[they] are saying to us,” the line can be rendered as a passive since there is no expressed subject for the participle.

[5:16]  40 tn הִנֵּה (hinneh) draws attention to the action reflected in the passive participle מֻכִּים (mukkim): “look, your servants are being beaten.”

[5:16]  41 tn The word rendered “fault” is the basic OT verb for “sin” – וְחָטָאת (vÿkhatat). The problem is that it is pointed as a perfect tense, feminine singular verb. Some other form of the verb would be expected, or a noun. But the basic word-group means “to err, sin, miss the mark, way, goal.” The word in this context seems to indicate that the people of Pharaoh – the slave masters – have failed to provide the straw. Hence: “fault” or “they failed.” But, as indicated, the line has difficult grammar, for it would literally translate: “and you [fem.] sin your people.” Many commentators (so GKC 206 §74.g) wish to emend the text to read with the Greek and the Syriac, thus: “you sin against your own people” (meaning the Israelites are his loyal subjects).

[5:17]  42 tn Heb “And he said.”

[5:17]  43 tn Or “loafers.” The form נִרְפִּים (nirpim) is derived from the verb רָפָה (rafah), meaning “to be weak, to let oneself go.”

[60:1]  44 tn Or “glory” (so most English versions).

[60:2]  45 tn The verb “covers” is understood by ellipsis (note the preceding line).

[60:2]  46 tn Or “glory” (so most English versions); TEV “the brightness of his presence.”

[60:4]  47 tn Heb “Lift up around your eyes and see!”

[60:5]  48 tn Or “shine,” or “be radiant” (NAB, NASB, NIV, NRSV).

[60:5]  49 tn Heb “and it will tremble and be wide, your heart.”

[60:5]  50 tn Heb “the wealth of the sea,” i.e., wealth that is transported from distant lands via the sea.

[60:6]  51 tn Heb “an abundance of camels will cover you.”

[60:6]  52 tn Heb “all of them, from Sheba.”

[60:6]  53 tn Heb “and they will announce the praises of the Lord.”

[60:7]  54 tn Heb “will serve you,” i.e., be available as sacrifices (see the next line). Another option is to understood these “rams” as symbolic of leaders who will be subject to the people of Zion. See v. 10.

[60:7]  55 tc Heb “they will go up on acceptance [on] my altar.” Some have suggested that the preposition עַל (’al) is dittographic (note the preceding יַעֲלוּ [yaalu]). Consequently, the form should be emended to לְרָצוֹן (lÿratson, “acceptably”; see BDB 953 s.v. רָצוֹן). However, the Qumran scroll 1QIsaa has both לרצון followed by the preposition על, which would argue against deleted the preposition. As the above translation seeks to demonstrate, the preposition עַל (’al) indicates a norm (“in accordance with acceptance” or “acceptably”; IBHS 218 §11.2.13e, n. 111) and the “altar” functions as an objective accusative with a verb of motion (cf. Gen 49:4; Lev 2:2; Num 13:17; J. N. Oswalt, Isaiah [NICOT], 2:534, n. 14).

[60:8]  56 tn Heb “fly” (so KJV, NASB, NRSV); NAB, NIV “fly along.”

[60:8]  57 tn Heb “to their windows,” i.e., to the openings in their coops. See HALOT 83 s.v. אֲרֻבָּה.

[60:9]  58 tn Or “islands” (NIV); CEV “distant islands”; TEV “distant lands.”

[60:9]  59 tn Heb “the ships of Tarshish.” See the note at 2:16.

[60:9]  60 tn Heb “to the name of the Lord your God.”

[60:9]  61 sn See the note on the phrase “the Holy One of Israel” in 1:4.

[60:10]  62 tn Heb “in my favor I will have compassion on you.”

[2:1]  63 map For location see Map5 B1; Map7 E2; Map8 E2; Map10 B4.

[2:1]  64 tn Grk “in the days.”

[2:1]  65 sn King Herod was Herod the Great, who ruled Palestine from 37 b.c. until he died in 4 b.c. He was known for his extensive building projects (including the temple in Jerusalem) and for his cruelty.

[2:1]  66 sn The Greek term magi here describes a class of wise men and priests who were astrologers (L&N 32.40).

[2:1]  67 map For location see Map5 B1; Map6 F3; Map7 E2; Map8 F2; Map10 B3; JP1 F4; JP2 F4; JP3 F4; JP4 F4.

[12:42]  68 sn On the queen of the South see 1 Kgs 10:1-3 and 2 Chr 9:1-12, as well as Josephus, Ant. 8.6.5-6 (8.165-175). The South most likely refers to modern southwest Arabia, possibly the eastern part of modern Yemen, although there is an ancient tradition reflected in Josephus which identifies this geo-political entity as Ethiopia.

[12:42]  69 tn Grk “behold.”

[8:27]  70 tn Grk “And,” but καί (kai) carries something of a resultative force in this context because what follows describes Philip’s response to the angel’s command.

[8:27]  71 tn Grk “So getting up he went.” The aorist participle ἀναστάς (anastas) has been translated as a finite verb due to requirements of contemporary English style.

[8:27]  72 tn Grk “And there.” Because of the difference between Greek style, which often begins sentences or clauses with “and,” and English style, which generally does not, καί (kai) has not been translated here.

[8:27]  73 tn Grk “and behold.” This expression is used to portray Philip’s encounter with the Ethiopian in a vivid way. In the English translation this vividness is difficult to convey; it is necessary to supply the words “he met.”

[8:27]  74 sn The term eunuch normally referred to a man who had been castrated, but this was not always the case (see Gen 39:1 LXX, where Potiphar is called a eunuch). Such castrated individuals were preferred as court officials in the East, although Judaism opposed the practice. The Mosaic law excluded eunuchs from Israel (Deut 23:1), although God certainly accepted them (Isa 56:3-5; Wis 3:14). This individual was a high official, since he was said to be in charge of all her treasury. He may or may not have been a eunuch physically. He appears to be the first fully Gentile convert to Christianity, since the Samaritans mentioned previously (Acts 8:4-25) were regarded as half-breeds.

[8:27]  75 tn Or “the Candace” (the title of the queen of the Ethiopians). The term Κανδάκης (Kandakh") is much more likely a title rather than a proper name (like Pharaoh, which is a title); see L&N 37.77. A few, however, still take the word to be the name of the queen (L&N 93.209). BDAG 507 s.v. Κανδάκη, treats the term as a title and lists classical usage by Strabo (Geography 17.1.54) and others.

[8:27]  76 tn Grk “who was over all her treasury, who.” The two consecutive relative clauses make for awkward English style, so the second was begun as a new sentence with the pronoun “he” supplied in place of the Greek relative pronoun to make a complete sentence in English.

[8:27]  77 sn Since this man had come to Jerusalem to worship, he may have been a proselyte to Judaism. This event is a precursor to Acts 10.

[8:28]  78 tn Grk “and was sitting.” Because of the difference between Greek style, which often begins sentences or clauses with “and,” and English style, which generally does not, καί (kai) has not been translated here.

[8:28]  79 tn Grk “and was reading.” Because of the difference between Greek style, which often begins sentences or clauses with “and,” and English style, which generally does not, καί (kai) has not been translated here.

[8:30]  80 tn The participle προσδραμών (prosdramwn) is regarded as attendant circumstance.

[8:30]  81 tn The words “to it” are not in the Greek text but are implied.

[8:30]  82 tn Grk “heard him”; the referent (the man) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[8:30]  83 tn Grk “and he.” Because of the length of the Greek sentence, the conjunction καί (kai) has not been translated here. Instead a new English sentence is begun.

[8:30]  84 tn Grk “he said”; but since what follows is a question, it is better English style to translate the introduction to the question “he asked him.”

[8:31]  85 tn Grk “He”; the referent (the man) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[8:31]  86 tn Grk “How am I able, unless…” The translation is based on the force of the conjunction γάρ (gar) in this context. The translation “How in the world can I?” is given in BDAG 189 s.v. γάρ 1.f.

[8:32]  87 tn Grk “he”; the referent (the man) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[8:32]  88 tn Grk “does.” The present tense here was translated as a past tense to maintain consistency with the first line of the quotation (“he was led like a sheep to slaughter”), which has an aorist passive verb normally translated as a past tense in English.

[8:33]  89 tc ‡ Most later mss (C E Ψ 33vid Ï sy) read “In his humiliation,” adding αὐτοῦ (autou, “his”) after ταπεινώσει (tapeinwsei, “humiliation”), while the earlier and better witnesses lack the pronoun (so Ì74 א A B 1739 pc lat). However, the LXX of Isa 53:8 also lacks the pronoun, supplying motivation for scribes to omit it here. At the same time, scribes would also be motivated to add the pronoun both for clarity’s sake (note the similar impulse that led to the addition of δέ [de] by many of the same mss at the beginning of the next line) and to give balance to the lines (the pronoun is indisputably used five other times in vv. 32-33 in quoting Isa 53). On balance, the shorter reading is preferred.

[8:33]  90 tn Or “justice was denied him”; Grk “his justice was taken away.”

[8:33]  91 tn Or “family; or “origin.” The meaning of γενεά (genea) in the quotation is uncertain; BDAG 192 s.v. γενεά 4 suggests “family history.”

[8:33]  92 tn Grk “is taken away.” The present tense here was translated as a past tense to maintain consistency with the rest of the quotation.

[8:33]  93 sn A quotation from Isa 53:7-8.

[8:34]  94 tn Grk “answered and said.” The redundant participle ἀποκριθείς (apokriqei") has not been translated.

[8:34]  95 tn Grk “I beg you,” “I ask you.”

[8:34]  96 sn About himself, or about someone else? It is likely in 1st century Judaism this would have been understood as either Israel or Isaiah.

[8:35]  97 tn Grk “opening his mouth” (a Semitic idiom for beginning to speak in a somewhat formal manner). The participle ἀνοίξας (anoixa") has been translated as a finite verb due to requirements of contemporary English style.

[8:35]  98 sn Beginning with this scripture. The discussion likely included many of the scriptures Acts has already noted for the reader in earlier speeches. At the least, readers of Acts would know what other scriptures might be meant.

[8:36]  99 tn Or “What prevents me.” The rhetorical question means, “I should get baptized, right?”

[8:37]  100 tc A few later mss (E 36 323 453 945 1739 1891 pc) add, with minor variations, 8:37 “He said to him, ‘If you believe with your whole heart, you may.’ He replied, ‘I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.’” Verse 37 is lacking in {Ì45,74 א A B C 33 614 vg syp,h co}. It is clearly not a part of the original text of Acts. The variant is significant in showing how some in the early church viewed a confession of faith. The present translation follows NA27 in omitting the verse number, a procedure also followed by a number of other modern translations.

[8:38]  101 tn Grk “and they both went down into the water, both Philip and the eunuch.” Since this is somewhat redundant in English, it was simplified to “and both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water.”

[8:38]  102 sn Philip baptized. Again, someone beyond the Twelve has ministered an ordinance of faith.

[8:39]  103 tn BDAG 189 s.v. γάρ 2 indicates that under certain circumstances γάρ (gar) has the same meaning as δέ (de).

[8:39]  104 sn Note that the response to the gospel is rejoicing (joy, cf. Acts 11:23; 13:48).

[8:40]  105 tn Or “appeared.”

[8:40]  106 sn Azotus was a city on the coast of southern Palestine, known as Ashdod in OT times.

[8:40]  107 tn The words “the area” are not in the Greek text but are implied.

[8:40]  108 tn Or “he preached the gospel.”

[8:40]  109 tn Or “cities.”

[8:40]  110 sn Caesarea was a city on the coast of Palestine south of Mount Carmel (not Caesarea Philippi). See the note on Caesarea in Acts 10:1.



created in 0.03 seconds
powered by
bible.org - YLSA