2 Kings 3:26
Context3:26 When the king of Moab realized he was losing the battle, 1 he and 700 swordsmen tried to break through and attack 2 the king of Edom, but they failed.
2 Kings 8:21
Context8:21 Joram 3 crossed over to Zair with all his chariots. The Edomites, who had surrounded him, attacked at night and defeated him and his chariot officers. 4 The Israelite army retreated to their homeland. 5
2 Kings 14:7
Context14:7 He defeated 6 10,000 Edomites in the Salt Valley; he captured Sela in battle and renamed it Joktheel, a name it has retained to this very day.


[3:26] 1 tn Heb “and the king of Moab saw that the battle was too strong for him.”
[3:26] 2 tn Heb “he took with him seven hundred men, who drew the sword, to break through against.”
[8:21] 3 sn Joram is a short form of the name Jehoram.
[8:21] 4 tn Heb “and he arose at night and defeated Edom, who had surrounded him, and the chariot officers.” The Hebrew text as it stands gives the impression that Joram was surrounded and launched a victorious night counterattack. It would then be quite natural to understand the last statement in the verse to refer to an Edomite retreat. Yet v. 22 goes on to state that the Edomite revolt was successful. Therefore, if the MT is retained, it may be better to understand the final statement in v. 21 as a reference to an Israelite retreat (made in spite of the success described in the preceding sentence). The translation above assumes an emendation of the Hebrew text. Adding a third masculine singular pronominal suffix to the accusative sign before Edom (reading אֶתוֹ [’eto], “him,” instead of just אֶת [’et]) and taking Edom as the subject of verbs allows one to translate the verse in a way that is more consistent with the context, which depicts an Israelite defeat, not victory. There is, however, no evidence for this emendation.