2 Thessalonians 3:10
Context3:10 For even when we were with you, we used to give you this command: “If anyone is not willing to work, neither should he eat.”
John 16:4
Context16:4 But I have told you these things 1 so that when their time 2 comes, you will remember that I told you about them. 3
“I did not tell you these things from the beginning because I was with you. 4
Galatians 5:21
Context5:21 envying, 5 murder, 6 drunkenness, carousing, 7 and similar things. I am warning you, as I had warned you before: Those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God!
Galatians 5:1
Context5:1 For freedom 8 Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not be subject again to the yoke 9 of slavery.
Galatians 2:11
Context2:11 But when Cephas 10 came to Antioch, 11 I opposed him to his face, because he had clearly done wrong. 12
Galatians 2:2
Context2:2 I went there 13 because of 14 a revelation and presented 15 to them the gospel that I preach among the Gentiles. But I did so 16 only in a private meeting with the influential people, 17 to make sure that I was not running – or had not run 18 – in vain.
Galatians 1:15
Context1:15 But when the one 19 who set me apart from birth 20 and called me by his grace was pleased
![Drag to resize](images/t_arrow.gif)
![Drag to resize](images/d_arrow.gif)
[16:4] 1 tn The first half of v. 4 resumes the statement of 16:1, ταῦτα λελάληκα ὑμῖν (tauta lelalhka Jumin), in a somewhat more positive fashion, omitting the reference to the disciples being caused to stumble.
[16:4] 3 tn The words “about them” are not in the Greek text, but are implied.
[16:4] 4 sn This verse serves as a transition between the preceding discussion of the persecutions the disciples will face in the world after the departure of Jesus, and the following discussion concerning the departure of Jesus and the coming of the Spirit-Paraclete. Jesus had not told the disciples these things from the beginning because he was with them.
[5:21] 1 tn This term is plural in Greek (as is “murder” and “carousing”), but for clarity these abstract nouns have been translated as singular.
[5:21] 2 tc ‡ φόνοι (fonoi, “murders”) is absent in such important
[5:21] 3 tn Or “revelings,” “orgies” (L&N 88.287).
[5:1] 1 tn Translating the dative as “For freedom” shows the purpose for Christ setting us free; however, it is also possible to take the phrase in the sense of means or instrument (“with [or by] freedom”), referring to the freedom mentioned in 4:31 and implied throughout the letter.
[5:1] 2 sn Here the yoke figuratively represents the burdensome nature of slavery.
[2:11] 1 sn Cephas. This individual is generally identified with the Apostle Peter (L&N 93.211).
[2:11] 2 map For location see JP1 F2; JP2 F2; JP3 F2; JP4 F2.
[2:11] 3 tn Grk “because he stood condemned.”
[2:2] 1 tn Grk “I went up”; one always spoke idiomatically of going “up” to Jerusalem.
[2:2] 2 tn Or “in accordance with.” According to BDAG 512 s.v. κατά B.5.a.δ, “Oft. the norm is at the same time the reason, so that in accordance with and because of are merged…Instead of ‘in accordance w.’ κ. can mean simply because of, as a result of, on the basis of…κ. ἀποκάλυψιν Gal 2:2.”
[2:2] 3 tn Or “set before them.”
[2:2] 4 tn Grk “Gentiles, but only privately…to make sure.” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started with “But” and the words “I did so,” an implied repetition from the previous clause, were supplied to make a complete English sentence.
[2:2] 5 tn L&N 87.42 has “important persons, influential persons, prominent persons” for οἱ δοκοῦντες and translates this phrase in Gal 2:2 as “in a private meeting with the prominent persons.” The “prominent people” referred to here are the leaders of the Jerusalem church.
[2:2] 6 tn Here the first verb (τρέχω, trecw, “was not running”) is present subjunctive, while the second (ἔδραμον, edramon, “had not run”) is aorist indicative.
[1:15] 1 tc ‡ Several important witnesses have ὁ θεός (Jo qeos) after εὐδόκησεν (eudokhsen; so א A D Ψ 0278 33 1739 1881 Ï co) while the shorter reading is supported by Ì46 B F G 629 1505 pc lat. There is hardly any reason why scribes would omit the words (although the Beatty papyrus and the Western text do at times omit words and phrases), but several reasons why scribes would add the words (especially the need to clarify). The confluence of witnesses for the shorter reading (including a few fathers and versions) adds strong support for its authenticity. It is also in keeping with Paul’s style to refrain from mentioning God by name as a rhetorical device (cf. ExSyn 437 [although this section deals with passive constructions, the principle is the same]). NA27 includes the words in brackets, indicating some doubts as to their authenticity.