Acts 17:11
Context17:11 These Jews 1 were more open-minded 2 than those in Thessalonica, 3 for they eagerly 4 received 5 the message, examining 6 the scriptures carefully every day 7 to see if these things were so.
Acts 25:16
Context25:16 I answered them 8 that it was not the custom of the Romans to hand over anyone 9 before the accused had met his accusers face to face 10 and had been given 11 an opportunity to make a defense against the accusation. 12


[17:11] 1 tn Grk “These”; the referent (the Jews in the synagogue at Berea) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
[17:11] 2 tn Or “more willing to learn.” L&N 27.48 and BDAG 404 s.v. εὐγενής 2 both use the term “open-minded” here. The point is that they were more receptive to Paul’s message.
[17:11] 3 sn Thessalonica was a city in Macedonia (modern Salonica).
[17:11] 4 tn Or “willingly,” “readily”; Grk “with all eagerness.”
[17:11] 5 tn Grk “who received.” Here the relative pronoun (“who”) has been translated as a pronoun (“they”) preceded by a semicolon, which is less awkward in contemporary English than a relative clause at this point.
[17:11] 6 tn This verb (BDAG 66 s.v. ἀνακρίνω 1) refers to careful examination.
[17:11] 7 tn BDAG 437 s.v. ἡμέρα 2.c has “every day” for this phrase in this verse.
[25:16] 8 tn Grk “to whom I answered.” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, the relative pronoun (“whom”) has been replaced with a personal pronoun (“them”) and a new sentence started in the translation at the beginning of v. 16.
[25:16] 9 tn Grk “any man.” This is a generic use of ἄνθρωπος (anqrwpos).
[25:16] 10 tn Or “has met his accusers in person.”
[25:16] 11 tn Grk “and receives.”
[25:16] 12 tn Or “indictment” (a legal technical term). BDAG 273-74 s.v. ἔγκλημα 1 states, “legal t.t.…ἀπολογία περὶ τοῦ ἐ. defense against the accusation Ac 25:16.” L&N 56.6 defines ἔγκλημα (enklhma) as “(a technical, legal term) a formal indictment or accusation brought against someone – ‘indictment, accusation, case.’ …‘and might receive an opportunity for a defense against the indictment’ Ac 25:16.”