Daniel 1:1-5

Daniel Finds Favor in Babylon

1:1 In the third ¹  year of the reign of King Jehoiakim of Judah, King Nebuchadnezzar ²  of Babylon advanced against Jerusalem ³  and laid it under siege. ⁴  1:2 Now the Lord ⁵  delivered ⁶  King Jehoiakim of Judah into his power, ⁷  along with some of the vessels ⁸  of the temple of God. ⁹  He brought them to the land of Babylonia ¹⁰  to the temple of his god ¹¹  and put ¹²  the vessels in the treasury of his god.

1:3 The king commanded ¹³  Ashpenaz, ¹⁴  who was in charge of his court officials, ¹⁵  to choose ¹⁶  some of the Israelites who were of royal and noble descent ¹⁷  – 1:4 young men in whom there was no physical defect and who were handsome, ¹⁸  well versed in all kinds of wisdom, well educated ¹⁹  and having keen insight, ²⁰  and who were capable ²¹  of entering the king’s royal service ²²  – and to teach them the literature and language ²³  of the Babylonians. ²⁴  1:5 So the king assigned them a daily ration ²⁵  from his royal delicacies ²⁶  and from the wine he himself drank. They were to be trained ²⁷  for the next three years. At the end of that time they were to enter the king’s service. ²⁸ 

[1:1]  ¹ sn The third year of the reign of Jehoiakim would be ca. 605 B.C. At this time Daniel would have been a teenager. The reference to Jehoiakim’s third year poses a serious crux interpretum, since elsewhere these events are linked to his fourth year (Jer 25:1; cf. 2 Kgs 24:1; 2 Chr 36:5-8). Apparently Daniel is following an accession year chronology, whereby the first partial year of a king’s reign was reckoned as the accession year rather than as the first year of his reign. Jeremiah, on the other hand, is following a nonaccession year chronology, whereby the accession year is reckoned as the first year of the king’s reign. In that case, the conflict is only superficial. Most modern scholars, however, have concluded that Daniel is historically inaccurate here.

[1:1]  ² sn King Nebuchadnezzar ruled Babylon from ca. 605-562 B.C.

[1:1]  ³ map For location see Map5 B1; Map6 F3; Map7 E2; Map8 F2; Map10 B3; JP1 F4; JP2 F4; JP3 F4; JP4 F4.

[1:1]  ⁴ sn This attack culminated in the first of three major deportations of Jews to Babylon. The second one occurred in 597 B.C. and included among many other Jewish captives the prophet Ezekiel. The third deportation occurred in 586 B.C., at which time the temple and the city of Jerusalem were thoroughly destroyed.

[1:2]  ⁵ tn The Hebrew term translated “Lord” here is אֲדֹנָי (’adonay).

[1:2]  ⁶ tn Heb “gave.”

[1:2]  ⁷ tn Heb “hand,” which is often used idiomatically for one’s power and authority. See BDB 390 s.v. יָד 2.

[1:2]  ⁸ tn Or “utensils”; or “articles.”

[1:2]  ⁹ tn Heb “house of God.”

[1:2]  ¹⁰ sn The land of Babylonia (Heb “the land of Shinar”) is another name for Sumer and Akkad, where Babylon was located (cf. Gen 10:10; 11:2; 14:1, 9; Josh 7:21; Isa 11:11; Zech 5:11).

[1:2]  ¹¹ tn Or “gods” (NCV, NRSV, TEV; also later in this verse). The Hebrew term can be used as a numerical plural for many gods or as a plural of majesty for one particular god. Since Nebuchadnezzar was a polytheist, it is not clear if the reference here is to many gods or one particular deity. The plural of majesty, while normally used for Israel’s God, is occasionally used of foreign gods (cf. BDB 43 s.v. אֱלֹהִים 1, 2). See Judg 11:24 (of the Moabite god Chemosh); 1 Sam 5:7 (of the Philistine god Dagon); 1 Kgs 11:33 (of the Canaanite goddess Astarte, the Moabite god Chemosh, and the Ammonite god Milcom); 2 Kgs 19:37 (of the Assyrian god Nisroch). Since gods normally had their own individual temples, Dan 1:2 probably refers to a particular deity, perhaps Marduk, the supreme god of Babylon, or Marduk’s son Nabu, after whom Nebuchadnezzar was named. The name Nebuchadnezzar means “Nabu has protected the son who will inherit” (HALOT 660 s.v. נְבוּכַדְרֶאצַּר). For a discussion of how temples functioned in Babylonian religion see H. Ringgren, Religions of the Ancient Near East, 77-81.

[1:2]  ¹² tn Heb “brought.” Though the Hebrew verb “brought” is repeated in this verse, the translation uses “brought…put” for stylistic variation.

[1:3]  ¹³ tn Or “gave orders to.” Heb “said to.”

[1:3]  ¹⁴ sn It is possible that the word Ashpenaz is not a proper name at all, but a general term for “innkeeper.” See J. J. Collins, Daniel (Hermeneia), 127, n. 9. However, the ancient versions understand the term to be a name, and the present translation (along with most English versions) understands the word in this way.

[1:3]  ¹⁵ sn The word court official (Hebrew saris) need not mean “eunuch” in a technical sense (see Gen 37:36, where the term refers to Potiphar, who had a wife), although in the case of the book of Daniel there was in Jewish literature a common tradition to that effect. On the OT usage of this word see HALOT 769-70 s.v. סָרֹיס.

[1:3]  ¹⁶ tn Heb “bring.”

[1:3]  ¹⁷ tn Heb “and from the seed of royalty and from the nobles.”

[1:4]  ¹⁸ tn Heb “good of appearance.”

[1:4]  ¹⁹ tn Heb “knowers of knowledge.”

[1:4]  ²⁰ tn Heb “understanders of knowledge.”

[1:4]  ²¹ tn Heb “who had strength.”

[1:4]  ²² tn Heb “to stand in the palace of the king.” Cf. vv. 5, 19.

[1:4]  ²³ sn The language of the Chaldeans referred to here is Akkadian, an East Semitic cuneiform language.

[1:4]  ²⁴ tn Heb “Chaldeans” (so KJV, NAB, NASB, NRSV). This is an ancient name for the Babylonians.

[1:5]  ²⁵ tn Heb “a thing of a day in its day.”

[1:5]  ²⁶ tn Heb “from the delicacies of the king.”

[1:5]  ²⁷ tn Or “educated.” See HALOT 179 s.v. I גדל.

[1:5]  ²⁸ tn Heb “stand before the king.”