Deuteronomy 19:17-21
Context19:17 then both parties to the controversy must stand before the Lord, that is, before the priests and judges 1 who will be in office in those days. 19:18 The judges will thoroughly investigate the matter, and if the witness should prove to be false and to have given false testimony against the accused, 2 19:19 you must do to him what he had intended to do to the accused. In this way you will purge 3 evil from among you. 19:20 The rest of the people will hear and become afraid to keep doing such evil among you. 19:21 You must not show pity; the principle will be a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a hand for a hand, and a foot for a foot. 4
Ezekiel 44:24
Context44:24 “‘In a controversy they will act as judges; 5 they will judge according to my ordinances. They will keep my laws and my statutes regarding all my appointed festivals and will observe 6 my Sabbaths.
[19:17] 1 tn The appositional construction (“before the
[19:18] 2 tn Heb “his brother” (also in the following verse).
[19:19] 3 tn Heb “you will burn out” (בִּעַרְתָּ, bi’arta). Like a cancer, unavenged sin would infect the whole community. It must, therefore, be excised by the purging out of its perpetrators who, presumably, remained unrepentant (cf. Deut 13:6; 17:7, 12; 21:21; 22:21-22, 24; 24:7).
[19:21] 4 sn This kind of justice is commonly called lex talionis or “measure for measure” (cf. Exod 21:23-25; Lev 24:19-20). It is likely that it is the principle that is important and not always a strict application. That is, the punishment should fit the crime and it may do so by the payment of fines or other suitable and equitable compensation (cf. Exod 22:21; Num 35:31). See T. S. Frymer-Kensky, “Tit for Tat: The Principle of Equal Retribution in Near Eastern and Biblical Law,” BA 43 (1980): 230-34.
[44:24] 5 sn For a historical illustration of the priest carrying out this function, see 2 Chr 19:9-11.