Genesis 32:9
Context32:9 Then Jacob prayed, 1 “O God of my father Abraham, God of my father Isaac, O Lord, you said 2 to me, ‘Return to your land and to your relatives and I will make you prosper.’ 3
Genesis 32:1
Context32:1 So Jacob went on his way and the angels of God 4 met him.
Genesis 18:1-2
Context18:1 The Lord appeared to Abraham 5 by the oaks 6 of Mamre while 7 he was sitting at the entrance 8 to his tent during the hottest time of the day. 18:2 Abraham 9 looked up 10 and saw 11 three men standing across 12 from him. When he saw them 13 he ran from the entrance of the tent to meet them and bowed low 14 to the ground. 15
Genesis 19:15
Context19:15 At dawn 16 the angels hurried Lot along, saying, “Get going! Take your wife and your two daughters who are here, 17 or else you will be destroyed when the city is judged!” 18
Matthew 6:9
Context6:9 So pray this way: 19
Our Father 20 in heaven, may your name be honored, 21
Ephesians 1:16-17
Context1:16 I do not cease to give thanks for you when I remember you 22 in my prayers. 1:17 I pray that 23 the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, 24 may give you spiritual wisdom and revelation 25 in your growing knowledge of him, 26
Ephesians 1:1
Context1:1 From Paul, 27 an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, to the saints [in Ephesus], 28 the faithful 29 in Christ Jesus.
Ephesians 3:11-13
Context3:11 This was according to 30 the eternal purpose that he accomplished in Christ Jesus our Lord, 3:12 in whom we have boldness and confident access 31 to God 32 because of 33 Christ’s 34 faithfulness. 35 3:13 For this reason I ask you 36 not to lose heart because of what I am suffering for you, 37 which 38 is your glory. 39
Ephesians 3:2
Context3:2 if indeed 40 you have heard of the stewardship 41 of God’s grace that was given to me for you,
Ephesians 1:2
Context1:2 Grace and peace to you 42 from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ!
Ephesians 2:16-17
Context2:16 and to reconcile them both in one body to God through the cross, by which the hostility has been killed. 43 2:17 And he came and preached peace to you who were far off and peace to those who were near,
[32:9] 2 tn Heb “the one who said.”
[32:9] 3 tn Heb “I will cause good” or “I will treat well [or “favorably”].” The idea includes more than prosperity, though that is its essential meaning. Here the form is subordinated to the preceding imperative and indicates purpose or result. Jacob is reminding God of his promise in the hope that God will honor his word.
[32:1] 4 sn The phrase angels of God occurs only here and in Gen 28:12 in the OT. Jacob saw a vision of angels just before he left the promised land. Now he encounters angels as he prepares to return to it. The text does not give the details of the encounter, but Jacob’s response suggests it was amicable. This location was a spot where heaven made contact with earth, and where God made his presence known to the patriarch. See C. Houtman, “Jacob at Mahanaim: Some Remarks on Genesis XXXII 2-3,” VT 28 (1978): 37-44.
[18:1] 5 tn Heb “him”; the referent (Abraham) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
[18:1] 7 tn The disjunctive clause here is circumstantial to the main clause.
[18:1] 8 tn The Hebrew noun translated “entrance” is an adverbial accusative of place.
[18:2] 9 tn Heb “he”; the referent (Abraham) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
[18:2] 10 tn Heb “lifted up his eyes.”
[18:2] 11 tn Heb “and saw, and look.” The particle הִנֵּה (hinneh) draws attention to what he saw. The drawn-out description focuses the reader’s attention on Abraham’s deliberate, fixed gaze and indicates that what he is seeing is significant.
[18:2] 12 tn The Hebrew preposition עַל (’al) indicates the three men were nearby, but not close by, for Abraham had to run to meet them.
[18:2] 13 tn The pronoun “them” has been supplied in the translation for clarification. In the Hebrew text the verb has no stated object.
[18:2] 14 tn The form וַיִּשְׁתַּחוּ (vayyishtakhu, “and bowed low”) is from the verb הִשְׁתַּחֲוָה (hishtakhavah, “to worship, bow low to the ground”). It is probably from a root חָוָה (khavah), though some derive it from שָׁחָה (shakhah).
[18:2] 15 sn The reader knows this is a theophany. The three visitors are probably the
[19:15] 16 tn Heb “When dawn came up.”
[19:15] 17 tn Heb “who are found.” The wording might imply he had other daughters living in the city, but the text does not explicitly state this.
[19:15] 18 tn Or “with the iniquity [i.e., punishment] of the city” (cf. NASB, NRSV).
[6:9] 19 sn Pray this way. What follows, although traditionally known as the Lord’s prayer, is really the disciples’ prayer. It represents how they are to approach God, by acknowledging his uniqueness and their need for his provision and protection.
[6:9] 20 sn God is addressed in terms of intimacy (Father). The original Semitic term here was probably Abba. The term is a little unusual in a personal prayer, especially as it lacks qualification. It is not the exact equivalent of “daddy” (as is sometimes popularly suggested), but it does suggest a close, familial relationship.
[6:9] 21 tn Grk “hallowed be your name.”
[1:16] 22 tn Grk “making mention [of you].”
[1:17] 23 tn The words “I pray” are not in the Greek text, but have been supplied to clarify the meaning; v. 17 is a subordinate clause to v. 16 (“I pray” in v. 17 is implied from v. 16). Eph 1:15-23 constitutes one sentence in Greek, but a new sentence was started here in the translation in light of contemporary English usage.
[1:17] 24 tn Or “glorious Father.” The genitive phrase “of glory” is most likely an attributive genitive. The literal translation “Father of glory” has been retained because of the parallelism with the first line of the verse: “the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory.”
[1:17] 25 tn Or “the Spirit of wisdom and revelation,” or “a spirit of wisdom and revelation.” Verse 17 involves a complex exegetical problem revolving around the Greek term πνεῦμα (pneuma). Some take it to mean “the Spirit,” others “a spirit,” and still others “spiritual.” (1) If “the Spirit” is meant, the idea must be a metonymy of cause for effect, because the author had just indicated in vv. 13-14 that the Spirit was already given (hence, there is no need for him to pray that he be given again). But the effect of the Spirit is wisdom and revelation. (2) If “a spirit” is meant, the idea may be that the readers will have the ability to gain wisdom and insight as they read Paul’s letters, but the exact meaning of “a spirit” remains ambiguous. (3) To take the genitives following πνεῦμα as attributed genitives (see ExSyn 89-91), in which the head noun (“S/spirit”) functions semantically like an adjective (“spiritual”) is both grammatically probable and exegetically consistent.
[1:17] 26 tn Grk “in the knowledge of him.”
[1:1] 27 tn Grk “Paul.” The word “from” is not in the Greek text, but has been supplied to indicate the sender of the letter.
[1:1] 28 tc The earliest and most important
[1:1] 29 tn Grk “and faithful.” The construction in Greek (as well as Paul’s style [and even if this letter is not by Paul it follows the general style of Paul’s letters, with some modifications]) suggests that the saints are identical to the faithful; hence, the καί (kai) is best left untranslated. See M. Barth, Ephesians (AB 34), 1:68 and ExSyn 282.
[3:11] 30 tn Grk “according to.” The verse is a prepositional phrase subordinate to v. 10.
[3:12] 31 tn Grk “access in confidence.”
[3:12] 32 tn The phrase “to God” is not in the text, but is clearly implied by the preceding, “access.”
[3:12] 33 tn Grk “through,” “by way of.”
[3:12] 35 tn Or “faith in him.” A decision is difficult here. Though traditionally translated “faith in Jesus Christ,” an increasing number of NT scholars are arguing that πίστις Χριστοῦ (pisti" Cristou) and similar phrases in Paul (here and in Rom 3:22, 26; Gal 2:16, 20; 3:22; Phil 3:9) involve a subjective genitive and mean “Christ’s faith” or “Christ’s faithfulness” (cf., e.g., G. Howard, “The ‘Faith of Christ’,” ExpTim 85 [1974]: 212-15; R. B. Hays, The Faith of Jesus Christ [SBLDS]; Morna D. Hooker, “Πίστις Χριστοῦ,” NTS 35 [1989]: 321-42). Noteworthy among the arguments for the subjective genitive view is that when πίστις takes a personal genitive it is almost never an objective genitive (cf. Matt 9:2, 22, 29; Mark 2:5; 5:34; 10:52; Luke 5:20; 7:50; 8:25, 48; 17:19; 18:42; 22:32; Rom 1:8; 12; 3:3; 4:5, 12, 16; 1 Cor 2:5; 15:14, 17; 2 Cor 10:15; Phil 2:17; Col 1:4; 2:5; 1 Thess 1:8; 3:2, 5, 10; 2 Thess 1:3; Titus 1:1; Phlm 6; 1 Pet 1:9, 21; 2 Pet 1:5). On the other hand, the objective genitive view has its adherents: A. Hultgren, “The Pistis Christou Formulations in Paul,” NovT 22 (1980): 248-63; J. D. G. Dunn, “Once More, ΠΙΣΤΙΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΥ,” SBL Seminar Papers, 1991, 730-44. Most commentaries on Romans and Galatians usually side with the objective view.
[3:13] 36 tn Grk “I ask.” No direct object is given in Greek, leaving room for the possibility that either “God” (since the verb is often associated with prayer) or “you” is in view.
[3:13] 37 tn Grk “my trials on your behalf.”
[3:13] 38 sn Which. The antecedent (i.e., the word or concept to which this clause refers back) may be either “what I am suffering for you” or the larger concept of the recipients not losing heart over Paul’s suffering for them. The relative pronoun “which” is attracted to the predicate nominative “glory” in its gender and number (feminine singular), making the antecedent ambiguous. Paul’s suffering for them could be viewed as their glory (cf. Col 1:24 for a parallel) in that his suffering has brought about their salvation, but if so his suffering must be viewed as more than his present imprisonment in Rome; it would be a general description of his ministry overall (cf. 2 Cor 11:23-27). The other option is that the author is implicitly arguing that the believers have continued to have courage in the midst of his trials (as not to lose heart suggests) and that this is their glory. Philippians 1:27-28 offers an interesting parallel: The believers’ courage in the face of adversity is a sign of their salvation.
[3:13] 39 tn Or “Or who is your glory?” The relative pronoun ἥτις (Jhti"), if divided differently, would become ἤ τίς (h ti"). Since there were no word breaks in the original
[3:2] 40 sn If indeed. The author is not doubting whether his audience has heard, but is rather using provocative language (if indeed) to engage his audience in thinking about the magnificence of God’s grace. However, in English translation, the apodosis (“then”-clause) does not come until v. 13, leaving the protasis (“if”-clause) dangling. Eph 3:2-7 constitute one sentence in Greek.
[3:2] 41 tn Or “administration,” “dispensation,” “commission.”