NETBible KJV GRK-HEB XRef Names Arts Hymns

  Discovery Box

Isaiah 46:13

Context

46:13 I am bringing my deliverance near, it is not far away;

I am bringing my salvation near, 1  it does not wait.

I will save Zion; 2 

I will adorn Israel with my splendor.” 3 

Isaiah 51:5-6

Context

51:5 I am ready to vindicate, 4 

I am ready to deliver, 5 

I will establish justice among the nations. 6 

The coastlands 7  wait patiently for me;

they wait in anticipation for the revelation of my power. 8 

51:6 Look up at the sky!

Look at the earth below!

For the sky will dissipate 9  like smoke,

and the earth will wear out like clothes;

its residents will die like gnats.

But the deliverance I give 10  is permanent;

the vindication I provide 11  will not disappear. 12 

Isaiah 51:8

Context

51:8 For a moth will eat away at them like clothes;

a clothes moth will devour them like wool.

But the vindication I provide 13  will be permanent;

the deliverance I give will last.”

Isaiah 54:17

Context

54:17 No weapon forged to be used against you will succeed;

you will refute everyone who tries to accuse you. 14 

This is what the Lord will do for his servants –

I will vindicate them,” 15 

says the Lord.

Isaiah 61:10

Context

61:10 I 16  will greatly rejoice 17  in the Lord;

I will be overjoyed because of my God. 18 

For he clothes me in garments of deliverance;

he puts on me a robe symbolizing vindication. 19 

I look like a bridegroom when he wears a turban as a priest would;

I look like a bride when she puts on her jewelry. 20 

Romans 3:22

Context
3:22 namely, the righteousness of God through the faithfulness of Jesus Christ 21  for all who believe. For there is no distinction,

Romans 5:17-18

Context
5:17 For if, by the transgression of the one man, 22  death reigned through the one, how much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one, Jesus Christ!

5:18 Consequently, 23  just as condemnation 24  for all people 25  came 26  through one transgression, 27  so too through the one righteous act 28  came righteousness leading to life 29  for all people.

Romans 5:1

Context
The Expectation of Justification

5:1 30 Therefore, since we have been declared righteous by faith, we have 31  peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,

Colossians 1:1-2

Context
Salutation

1:1 From Paul, 32  an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and Timothy our brother, 1:2 to the saints, the faithful 33  brothers and sisters 34  in Christ, at Colossae. Grace and peace to you 35  from God our Father! 36 

Colossians 1:21

Context
Paul’s Goal in Ministry

1:21 And you were at one time strangers and enemies in your 37  minds 38  as expressed through 39  your evil deeds,

Galatians 5:5

Context
5:5 For through the Spirit, by faith, we wait expectantly for the hope of righteousness.

Philippians 3:9

Context
3:9 and be found in him, not because I have my own righteousness derived from the law, but because I have the righteousness that comes by way of Christ’s faithfulness 40  – a righteousness from God that is in fact 41  based on Christ’s 42  faithfulness. 43 
Drag to resizeDrag to resize

[46:13]  1 tn Heb “my salvation.” The verb “I am bringing near” is understood by ellipsis (note the previous line).

[46:13]  2 tn Heb “I will place in Zion salvation”; NASB “I will grant salvation in Zion.”

[46:13]  3 tn Heb “to Israel my splendor”; KJV, ASV “for Israel my glory.”

[51:5]  4 tn Heb “my righteousness [or “vindication”] is near.”

[51:5]  5 tn Heb “my deliverance goes forth.”

[51:5]  6 tn Heb “and my arms will judge [on behalf of] nations.”

[51:5]  7 tn Or “islands” (NIV); TEV “Distant lands.”

[51:5]  8 tn Heb “for my arm” (so NIV, NRSV).

[51:6]  9 tn Heb “will be torn in pieces.” The perfect indicates the certitude of the event, from the Lord’s rhetorical perspective.

[51:6]  10 tn Heb “my deliverance.” The same Hebrew word can also be translated “salvation” (so KJV, NAB, NASB, NIV, NRSV, NLT); cf. CEV “victory.”

[51:6]  11 tn Heb “my righteousness [or “vindication”].”

[51:6]  12 tn Heb “will not be shattered [or “dismayed”].”

[51:8]  13 tn Heb “my vindication”; many English versions “my righteousness”; NRSV, TEV “my deliverance”; CEV “my victory.”

[54:17]  14 tn Heb “and every tongue that rises up for judgment with you will prove to be guilty.”

[54:17]  15 tn Heb “this is the inheritance of the servants of the Lord, and their vindication from me.”

[61:10]  16 sn The speaker in vv. 10-11 is not identified, but it is likely that the personified nation (or perhaps Zion) responds here to the Lord’s promise of restoration.

[61:10]  17 tn The infinitive absolute appears before the finite verb for emphasis.

[61:10]  18 tn Heb “my being is happy in my God”; NAB “in my God is the joy of my soul.”

[61:10]  19 tn Heb “robe of vindication”; KJV, NASB, NIV, NRSV “robe of righteousness.”

[61:10]  20 tn Heb “like a bridegroom [who] acts like a priest [by wearing] a turban, and like a bride [who] wears her jewelry.” The words “I look” are supplied for stylistic reasons and clarification.

[3:22]  21 tn Or “faith in Christ.” A decision is difficult here. Though traditionally translated “faith in Jesus Christ,” an increasing number of NT scholars are arguing that πίστις Χριστοῦ (pisti" Cristou) and similar phrases in Paul (here and in v. 26; Gal 2:16, 20; 3:22; Eph 3:12; Phil 3:9) involve a subjective genitive and mean “Christ’s faith” or “Christ’s faithfulness” (cf., e.g., G. Howard, “The ‘Faith of Christ’,” ExpTim 85 [1974]: 212-15; R. B. Hays, The Faith of Jesus Christ [SBLDS]; Morna D. Hooker, “Πίστις Χριστοῦ,” NTS 35 [1989]: 321-42). Noteworthy among the arguments for the subjective genitive view is that when πίστις takes a personal genitive it is almost never an objective genitive (cf. Matt 9:2, 22, 29; Mark 2:5; 5:34; 10:52; Luke 5:20; 7:50; 8:25, 48; 17:19; 18:42; 22:32; Rom 1:8; 12; 3:3; 4:5, 12, 16; 1 Cor 2:5; 15:14, 17; 2 Cor 10:15; Phil 2:17; Col 1:4; 2:5; 1 Thess 1:8; 3:2, 5, 10; 2 Thess 1:3; Titus 1:1; Phlm 6; 1 Pet 1:9, 21; 2 Pet 1:5). On the other hand, the objective genitive view has its adherents: A. Hultgren, “The Pistis Christou Formulations in Paul,” NovT 22 (1980): 248-63; J. D. G. Dunn, “Once More, ΠΙΣΤΙΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΥ,” SBL Seminar Papers, 1991, 730-44. Most commentaries on Romans and Galatians usually side with the objective view.

[5:17]  22 sn Here the one man refers to Adam (cf. 5:14).

[5:18]  23 tn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing.

[5:18]  24 tn Grk “[it is] unto condemnation for all people.”

[5:18]  25 tn Here ἀνθρώπους (anqrwpou") has been translated as a generic (“people”) since both men and women are clearly intended in this context.

[5:18]  26 tn There are no verbs in the Greek text of v. 18, forcing translators to supply phrases like “came through one transgression,” “resulted from one transgression,” etc.

[5:18]  27 sn One transgression refers to the sin of Adam in Gen 3:1-24.

[5:18]  28 sn The one righteous act refers to Jesus’ death on the cross.

[5:18]  29 tn Grk “righteousness of life.”

[5:1]  30 sn Many interpreters see Rom 5:1 as beginning the second major division of the letter.

[5:1]  31 tc A number of important witnesses have the subjunctive ἔχωμεν (ecwmen, “let us have”) instead of ἔχομεν (ecomen, “we have”) in v. 1. Included in the subjunctive’s support are א* A B* C D K L 33 81 630 1175 1739* pm lat bo. But the indicative is not without its supporters: א1 B2 F G P Ψ 0220vid 104 365 1241 1505 1506 1739c 1881 2464 pm. If the problem were to be solved on an external basis only, the subjunctive would be preferred. Because of this, the “A” rating on behalf of the indicative in the UBS4 appears overly confident. Nevertheless, the indicative is probably correct. First, the earliest witness to Rom 5:1 has the indicative (0220vid, third century). Second, the first set of correctors is sometimes, if not often, of equal importance with the original hand. Hence, א1 might be given equal value with א*. Third, there is a good cross-section of witnesses for the indicative: Alexandrian (in 0220vid, probably א1 1241 1506 1881 al), Western (in F G), and Byzantine (noted in NA27 as pm). Thus, although the external evidence is strongly in favor of the subjunctive, the indicative is represented well enough that its ancestry could easily go back to the original. Turning to the internal evidence, the indicative gains much ground. (1) The variant may have been produced via an error of hearing (since omicron and omega were pronounced alike in ancient Greek). This, of course, does not indicate which reading was original – just that an error of hearing may have produced one of them. In light of the indecisiveness of the transcriptional evidence, intrinsic evidence could play a much larger role. This is indeed the case here. (2) The indicative fits well with the overall argument of the book to this point. Up until now, Paul has been establishing the “indicatives of the faith.” There is only one imperative (used rhetorically) and only one hortatory subjunctive (and this in a quotation within a diatribe) up till this point, while from ch. 6 on there are sixty-one imperatives and seven hortatory subjunctives. Clearly, an exhortation would be out of place in ch. 5. (3) Paul presupposes that the audience has peace with God (via reconciliation) in 5:10. This seems to assume the indicative in v. 1. (4) As C. E. B. Cranfield notes, “it would surely be strange for Paul, in such a carefully argued writing as this, to exhort his readers to enjoy or to guard a peace which he has not yet explicitly shown to be possessed by them” (Romans [ICC], 1:257). (5) The notion that εἰρήνην ἔχωμεν (eirhnhn ecwmen) can even naturally mean “enjoy peace” is problematic (ExSyn 464), yet those who embrace the subjunctive have to give the verb some such force. Thus, although the external evidence is stronger in support of the subjunctive, the internal evidence points to the indicative. Although a decision is difficult, ἔχομεν appears to be the authentic reading.

[1:1]  32 tn Grk “Paul.” The word “from” is not in the Greek text, but has been supplied to indicate the sender of the letter.

[1:2]  33 tn Grk “and faithful.” The construction in Greek (as well as Paul’s style) suggests that the saints are identical to the faithful; hence, the καί (kai) is best left untranslated (cf. Eph 1:1). See ExSyn 281-82.

[1:2]  34 tn Grk “brothers,” but the Greek word may be used for “brothers and sisters” or “fellow Christians” as here (cf. BDAG 18 s.v. ἀδελφός 1, where considerable nonbiblical evidence for the plural ἀδελφοί [adelfoi] meaning “brothers and sisters” is cited).

[1:2]  35 tn Or “Grace to you and peace.”

[1:2]  36 tc Most witnesses, including some important ones (א A C F G I [P] 075 Ï it bo), read “and the Lord Jesus Christ” at the end of this verse, no doubt to conform the wording to the typical Pauline salutation. However, excellent and early witnesses (B D K L Ψ 33 81 1175 1505 1739 1881 al sa) lack this phrase. Since the omission is inexplicable as arising from the longer reading (otherwise, these mss would surely have deleted the phrase in the rest of the corpus Paulinum), it is surely authentic.

[1:21]  37 tn The article τῇ (th) has been translated as a possessive pronoun (ExSyn 215).

[1:21]  38 tn Although διανοία (dianoia) is singular in Greek, the previous plural noun ἐχθρούς (ecqrous) indicates that all those from Colossae are in view here.

[1:21]  39 tn The dative ἐν τοῖς ἔργοις τοῖς πονηροῖς (en toi" ergoi" toi" ponhroi") is taken as means, indicating the avenue through which hostility in the mind is revealed and made known.

[3:9]  40 tn Or “faith in Christ.” A decision is difficult here. Though traditionally translated “faith in Jesus Christ,” an increasing number of NT scholars are arguing that πίστις Χριστοῦ (pisti" Cristou) and similar phrases in Paul (here and in Rom 3:22, 26; Gal 2:16, 20; 3:22; Eph 3:12) involve a subjective genitive and mean “Christ’s faith” or “Christ’s faithfulness” (cf., e.g., G. Howard, “The ‘Faith of Christ’,” ExpTim 85 [1974]: 212-15; R. B. Hays, The Faith of Jesus Christ [SBLDS]; Morna D. Hooker, “Πίστις Χριστοῦ,” NTS 35 [1989]: 321-42). Noteworthy among the arguments for the subjective genitive view is that when πίστις takes a personal genitive it is almost never an objective genitive (cf. Matt 9:2, 22, 29; Mark 2:5; 5:34; 10:52; Luke 5:20; 7:50; 8:25, 48; 17:19; 18:42; 22:32; Rom 1:8; 12; 3:3; 4:5, 12, 16; 1 Cor 2:5; 15:14, 17; 2 Cor 10:15; Phil 2:17; Col 1:4; 2:5; 1 Thess 1:8; 3:2, 5, 10; 2 Thess 1:3; Titus 1:1; Phlm 6; 1 Pet 1:9, 21; 2 Pet 1:5). On the other hand, the objective genitive view has its adherents: A. Hultgren, “The Pistis Christou Formulations in Paul,” NovT 22 (1980): 248-63; J. D. G. Dunn, “Once More, ΠΙΣΤΙΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΥ,” SBL Seminar Papers, 1991, 730-44. Most commentaries on Romans and Galatians usually side with the objective view.

[3:9]  41 tn The words “in fact” are supplied because of English style, picking up the force of the Greek article with πίστει (pistei). See also the following note on the word “Christ’s.”

[3:9]  42 tn Grk “based on the faithfulness.” The article before πίστει (pistei) is taken as anaphoric, looking back to διὰ πίστεως Χριστοῦ (dia pistew" Cristou); hence, “Christ’s” is implied.

[3:9]  43 tn Or “based on faith.”



created in 0.03 seconds
powered by
bible.org - YLSA