John 7:18
Context7:18 The person who speaks on his own authority 1 desires 2 to receive honor 3 for himself; the one who desires 4 the honor 5 of the one who sent him is a man of integrity, 6 and there is no unrighteousness in him.
John 7:2
Context7:2 Now the Jewish feast of Tabernacles 7 was near. 8
Colossians 2:2
Context2:2 My goal is that 9 their hearts, having been knit together 10 in love, may be encouraged, and that 11 they may have all the riches that assurance brings in their understanding of the knowledge of the mystery of God, namely, Christ, 12
Colossians 2:17
Context2:17 these are only 13 the shadow of the things to come, but the reality 14 is Christ! 15
Colossians 4:1
Context4:1 Masters, treat your slaves with justice and fairness, because you know that you also have a master in heaven.
Colossians 1:11
Context1:11 being strengthened with all power according to his glorious might for the display of 16 all patience and steadfastness, joyfully
Colossians 1:1
Context1:1 From Paul, 17 an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and Timothy our brother,
Colossians 2:4
Context2:4 I say this so that no one will deceive you through arguments 18 that sound reasonable. 19
[7:18] 1 tn Grk “who speaks from himself.”
[7:18] 3 tn Or “praise”; Grk “glory.”
[7:18] 5 tn Or “praise”; Grk “glory.”
[7:18] 6 tn Or “is truthful”; Grk “is true.”
[7:2] 7 tn Or “feast of the Tents” (the feast where people lived in tents or shelters, which was celebrated in the autumn after harvest). John’s use of σκηνοπηγία (skhnophgia) for the feast of Tabernacles constitutes the only use of this term in the New Testament.
[7:2] 8 sn Since the present verse places these incidents at the feast of Tabernacles (
[2:2] 9 tn Verse two begins a subordinate ἵνα (Jina) clause which was divided up into two sentences for the sake of clarity in English. Thus the phrase “My goal is that” is an attempt to reflect in the translation the purpose expressed through the ἵνα clauses.
[2:2] 10 tn BDAG 956 s.v. συμβιβάζω 1.b reads “unite, knit together.” Some commentators take the verb as a reference to instruction, “instructed in love.” See P. T. O’Brien, Colossians, Philemon (WBC), 93.
[2:2] 11 tn The phrase “and that” translates the first εἰς (eis) clause of v. 2 and reflects the second goal of Paul’s striving and struggle for the Colossians – the first is “encouragement” and the second is “full assurance.”
[2:2] 12 tc There are at least a dozen variants here, almost surely generated by the unusual wording τοῦ θεοῦ, Χριστοῦ (tou qeou, Cristou, “of God, Christ”; so Ì46 B Hil). Scribes would be prone to conform this to more common Pauline expressions such as “of God, who is in Christ” (33), “of God, the Father of Christ” (א* A C 048vid 1175 bo), and “of the God and Father of Christ” (א2 Ψ 075 0278 365 1505 pc). Even though the external support for the wording τοῦ θεοῦ, Χριστοῦ is hardly overwhelming, it clearly best explains the rise of the other readings and should thus be regarded as authentic.
[2:17] 13 tn The word “only,” though not in the Greek text, is supplied in the English translation to bring out the force of the Greek phrase.
[2:17] 14 tn Grk “but the body of Christ.” The term body here, when used in contrast to shadow (σκιά, skia) indicates the opposite meaning, i.e., the reality or substance itself.
[2:17] 15 tn The genitive τοῦ Χριστοῦ (tou Cristou) is appositional and translated as such: “the reality is Christ.”
[1:11] 16 tn The expression “for the display of” is an attempt to convey in English the force of the Greek preposition εἰς (eis) in this context.
[1:1] 17 tn Grk “Paul.” The word “from” is not in the Greek text, but has been supplied to indicate the sender of the letter.
[2:4] 18 tn BDAG 812 s.v. πιθανολογία states, “persuasive speech, art of persuasion (so Pla., Theaet. 162e) in an unfavorable sense in its only occurrence in our lit. ἐν πιθανολογίᾳ by specious arguments Col 2:4 (cp. PLips 40 III, 7 διὰ πιθανολογίας).”
[2:4] 19 sn Paul’s point is that even though the arguments seem to make sense (sound reasonable), they are in the end false. Paul is not here arguing against the study of philosophy or serious thinking per se, but is arguing against the uncritical adoption of a philosophy that is at odds with a proper view of Christ and the ethics of the Christian life.