Joshua 19:45
Context19:45 Jehud, Bene Berak, Gath Rimmon,
Joshua 21:24
Context21:24 Aijalon, and Gath Rimmon, along with the grazing areas of each – a total of four cities.
Joshua 11:22
Context11:22 No Anakites were left in Israelite territory, though some remained in Gaza, Gath, and Ashdod.
Joshua 19:13
Context19:13 From there it crossed eastward to Gath Hepher and Eth Kazin and extended to Rimmon, turning toward Neah.
Joshua 21:25
Context21:25 From the half-tribe of Manasseh they assigned Taanach and Gath Rimmon, 1 along with the grazing areas of each – a total of two cities.
Joshua 13:3-4
Context13:3 from the Shihor River 2 east of 3 Egypt northward to the territory of Ekron (it is regarded as Canaanite territory), 4 including the area belonging to the five Philistine lords who ruled in Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gath, and Ekron, as well as Avvite land 5 13:4 to the south; 6 all the Canaanite territory, 7 from Arah 8 in the region of Sidon 9 to Aphek, as far as Amorite territory;


[21:25] 1 tn The name “Gath Rimmon” is problematic here, for it appears in the preceding list of Danite cities. The LXX reads “Iebatha”; 1 Chr 6:55 HT (6:70 ET) reads “Bileam.” Most modern translations retain the name “Gath Rimmon,” however.
[13:3] 1 tn Heb “the Shihor”; the word “River” is not in the Hebrew text, but has been supplied to clarify the meaning.
[13:3] 2 tn Heb “in front of.”
[13:3] 3 tn Heb “it is reckoned to the Canaanites.”
[13:3] 4 tn Heb “the five lords of the Philistines, the Gazaite, the Ashdodite, the Ashkelonite, the Gathite, and the Ekronite, and the Avvites.”
[13:4] 1 tn Or “from Teman.” The phrase is especially problematic if taken with what follows, as the traditional verse division suggests. For further discussion see T. C. Butler, Joshua (WBC), 146.
[13:4] 2 tn Heb “all the land of the Canaanites.”
[13:4] 3 tc The reading “Arah” assumes a slight emendation of the Hebrew vowel pointing. The MT reads, “and a cave,” or “and Mearah” (if one understands the word as a proper noun).