Discovery BoxLeviticus 13:27-59
Context13:27 The priest must then examine it on the seventh day, and if it is spreading further 1 on the skin, then the priest is to pronounce him unclean. It is a diseased infection. 2 13:28 But if the bright spot stays in its place, has not spread on the skin, 3 and it has faded, then it is the swelling of the burn, so the priest is to pronounce him clean, 4 because it is the scar of the burn.
13:29 “When a man or a woman has an infection on the head or in the beard, 5 13:30 the priest is to examine the infection, 6 and if 7 it appears to be deeper than the skin 8 and the hair in it is reddish yellow and thin, then the priest is to pronounce the person unclean. 9 It is scall, 10 a disease of the head or the beard. 11 13:31 But if the priest examines the scall infection and it does not appear to be deeper than the skin, 12 and there is no black hair in it, then the priest is to quarantine the person with the scall infection for seven days. 13 13:32 The priest must then examine the infection on the seventh day, and if 14 the scall has not spread, there is no reddish yellow hair in it, and the scall does not appear to be deeper than the skin, 15 13:33 then the individual is to shave himself, 16 but he must not shave the area affected by the scall, 17 and the priest is to quarantine the person with the scall for another seven days. 18 13:34 The priest must then examine the scall on the seventh day, and if 19 the scall has not spread on the skin and it does not appear to be deeper than the skin, 20 then the priest is to pronounce him clean. 21 So he is to wash his clothes and be clean. 13:35 If, however, the scall spreads further 22 on the skin after his purification, 13:36 then the priest is to examine it, and if 23 the scall has spread on the skin the priest is not to search further for reddish yellow hair. 24 The person 25 is unclean. 13:37 If, as far as the priest can see, the scall has stayed the same 26 and black hair has sprouted in it, the scall has been healed; the person is clean. So the priest is to pronounce him clean. 27
13:38 “When a man or a woman has bright spots – white bright spots – on the skin of their body, 13:39 the priest is to examine them, 28 and if 29 the bright spots on the skin of their body are faded white, it is a harmless rash that has broken out on the skin. The person is clean. 30
13:40 “When a man’s head is bare so that he is balding in back, 31 he is clean. 13:41 If his head is bare on the forehead 32 so that he is balding in front, 33 he is clean. 13:42 But if there is a reddish white infection in the back or front bald area, it is a disease breaking out in his back or front bald area. 13:43 The priest is to examine it, 34 and if 35 the swelling of the infection is reddish white in the back or front bald area like the appearance of a disease on the skin of the body, 36 13:44 he is a diseased man. He is unclean. The priest must surely pronounce him unclean because of his infection on his head. 37
13:45 “As for the diseased person who has the infection, 38 his clothes must be torn, the hair of his head must be unbound, he must cover his mustache, 39 and he must call out ‘Unclean! Unclean!’ 13:46 The whole time he has the infection 40 he will be continually unclean. He must live in isolation, and his place of residence must be outside the camp.
13:47 “When a garment has a diseased infection in it, 41 whether a wool or linen garment, 42 13:48 or in the warp or woof 43 of the linen or the wool, or in leather or anything made of leather, 44 13:49 if the infection 45 in the garment or leather or warp or woof or any article of leather is yellowish green or reddish, it is a diseased infection and it must be shown to the priest. 13:50 The priest is to examine and then quarantine the article with the infection for seven days. 46 13:51 He must then examine the infection on the seventh day. If the infection has spread in the garment, or in the warp, or in the woof, or in the leather – whatever the article into which the leather was made 47 – the infection is a malignant disease. It is unclean. 13:52 He must burn the garment or the warp or the woof, whether wool or linen, or any article of leather which has the infection in it. Because it is a malignant disease it must be burned up in the fire. 13:53 But if the priest examines it and 48 the infection has not spread in the garment or in the warp or in the woof or in any article of leather, 13:54 the priest is to command that they wash whatever has the infection and quarantine it for another seven days. 49 13:55 The priest must then examine it after the infection has been washed out, and if 50 the infection has not changed its appearance 51 even though the infection has not spread, it is unclean. You must burn it up in the fire. It is a fungus, whether on the back side or front side of the article. 52 13:56 But if the priest has examined it and 53 the infection has faded after it has been washed, he is to tear it out of 54 the garment or the leather or the warp or the woof. 13:57 Then if 55 it still appears again in the garment or the warp or the woof, or in any article of leather, it is an outbreak. Whatever has the infection in it you must burn up in the fire. 13:58 But the garment or the warp or the woof or any article of leather which you wash and infection disappears from it 56 is to be washed a second time and it will be clean.”
13:59 This is the law 57 of the diseased infection in the garment of wool or linen, or the warp or woof, or any article of leather, for pronouncing it clean or unclean. 58
[13:27] 1 tn Heb “is indeed spreading.”
[13:27] 2 tn For the rendering “diseased infection” see the note on v. 2 above.
[13:28] 3 tn Heb “and if under it the bright spot stands, it has not spread in the skin.”
[13:28] 4 tn This is the declarative Piel of the verb טָהֵר (taher; cf. the note on v. 6 above).
[13:29] 5 tn Heb “And a man or a woman if there is in him an infection in head or in beard.”
[13:30] 6 tn Heb “and the priest shall see the infection.”
[13:30] 7 tn Heb “and behold.”
[13:30] 8 tn Heb “its appearance is deep ‘from’ (comparative מִן, min, “deeper than”) the skin.”
[13:30] 9 tn This is the declarative Piel of the verb טָמֵא (tame’; cf. the note on v. 3 above).
[13:30] 10 tn The exact identification of this disease is unknown. Cf. KJV “dry scall”; NASB “a scale”; NIV, NCV, NRSV “an itch”; NLT “a contagious skin disease.” For a discussion of “scall” disease in the hair, which is a crusty scabby disease of the skin under the hair that also affects the hair itself, see J. E. Hartley, Leviticus (WBC), 192-93, and J. Milgrom, Leviticus (AB), 1:793-94. The Hebrew word rendered “scall” (נֶתֶק, neteq) is related to a verb meaning “to tear; to tear out; to tear apart.” It may derive from the scratching and/or the tearing out of the hair or the scales of the skin in response to the itching sensation caused by the disease.
[13:30] 11 tn Heb “It is scall. It is the disease of the head or the beard.”
[13:31] 12 tn Heb “and behold there is not its appearance deep ‘from’ (comparative מִן, min, meaning “deeper than”) the skin.”
[13:31] 13 tn Heb “and the priest will shut up the infection of the scall seven days.”
[13:32] 14 tn Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV).
[13:32] 15 tn Heb “and the appearance of the scall is not deep ‘from’ (comparative מִן, min, meaning “deeper than”) the skin.”
[13:33] 16 tn The shaving is done by the one who has the infection. Although KJV, ASV have the passive “he shall be shaven” here, most modern English versions have the reflexive “shall shave himself” (so NAB).
[13:33] 17 tn Heb “but the scall shall he not shave” (so KJV, ASV); NIV “except for the diseased area.”
[13:33] 18 tn Heb “and the priest will shut up the scall a second seven days.”
[13:34] 19 tn Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV).
[13:34] 20 tn Heb “and its appearance is not deep ‘from’ (comparative מִן, min, meaning “deeper than”) the skin.”
[13:34] 21 tn This is the declarative Piel of the verb טָהֵר (taher, cf. the note on v. 6 above).
[13:35] 22 tn Heb “And if spreading (infinitive absolute) it spreads further (finite verb).” For the infinitive absolute used to highlight contrast rather than emphasis see GKC 343 §113.p.
[13:36] 23 tn Heb “and behold.”
[13:36] 24 tn Heb “the priest shall not search to the reddish yellow hair.”
[13:36] 25 tn Heb “he”; the referent (the affected person) is specified in the translation for clarity (likewise in the following verse).
[13:37] 26 tn Heb “and if in his eyes the infection has stood.”
[13:37] 27 tn This is the declarative Piel of the verb טָהֵר (taher, cf. the note on v. 6 above).
[13:39] 28 tn Heb “and the priest shall see.”
[13:39] 29 tn Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV).
[13:39] 30 tn Heb “he,” but the regulation applies to a man or a woman (v. 38a). In the translation “the person” is used to specify the referent more clearly.
[13:40] 31 tn Heb “And a man, when his head is rubbed bare, he is bald-headed.” The translation offered here, referring to the back of the head (i.e., the area from the top of the head sloping backwards), is based on the contrast between this condition and that of the following verse. See also B. A. Levine, Leviticus (JPSTC), 82.
[13:41] 32 tn Heb “And if from the front edge of his face, his head is rubbed bare.” See the note on v. 40 above.
[13:41] 33 tn The rendering “balding in front” corresponds to the location of the bareness at the beginning of the verse.
[13:43] 34 tn Heb “and the priest shall see it” (cf. KJV). The MT has “him/it” which some take to refer to the person as a whole (i.e., “him”; see, e.g., J. Milgrom, Leviticus [AB], 1:770; NIV, NRSV, etc.), while others take it as a reference to the “infection” (נֶגַע, nega’) in v. 42 (J. E. Hartley, Leviticus [WBC], 172, 177). Smr has “her/it,” which would probably refer to “disease” (צָרַעַת, tsara’at) in v. 42. The general pattern in the chapter suggests that “it,” either the infection or the disease, is the object of the examination (see, e.g., v. 3 above and v. 50 below).
[13:43] 35 tn Heb “and behold.”
[13:43] 36 tn Heb “like appearance of disease of skin of flesh.”
[13:44] 37 tn Or perhaps translate, “His infection [is] on his head,” as a separate independent sentence (cf. KJV, ASV, NASB, NRSV). There is no causal expression in the Hebrew text connecting these two clauses, but the logical relationship between them seems to be causal.
[13:45] 38 tn Heb “And the diseased one who in him is the infection.”
[13:45] 39 tn Heb “and his head shall be unbound, and he shall cover on [his] mustache.” Tearing one’s clothing, allowing the hair to hang loose rather than bound up in a turban, and covering the mustache on the upper lip are all ways of expressing shame, grief, or distress (cf., e.g., Lev 10:6 and Micah 3:7).
[13:46] 40 tn Heb “All the days which the infection is in him.”
[13:47] 41 tn Heb “And the garment, if there is in it a mark of disease.”
[13:47] 42 tn Heb “in a wool garment or in a linen garment.”
[13:48] 43 sn The warp (vertical) and woof (horizontal) thread may be two different sets of thread not yet woven together, or they may refer to two different kinds of thread already woven, in which case one might have the disease in it while the other does not. See the explanation in J. Milgrom, Leviticus (AB), 1:809-10.
[13:48] 44 tn Heb “in any handiwork of skin” (cf. KJV, ASV, NRSV); most other modern English versions have “leather.”
[13:49] 45 tn Heb “and the infection is.” This clause is conditional in force, and is translated as such by almost all English versions.
[13:50] 46 tn Heb “And the priest shall see the infection and he shall shut up the infection seven days.”
[13:51] 47 tn Heb “to all which the leather was made into a handiwork.”
[13:53] 48 tn Heb “And if the priest sees and behold”; NASB “and indeed.”
[13:54] 49 tn Heb “a second seven days.”
[13:55] 50 tn Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV).
[13:55] 51 tn Heb “the infection has not changed its eye.” Smr has “its/his eyes,” as in vv. 5 and 37, but here it refers to the appearance of the article of cloth or leather, unlike vv. 5 and 37 where there is a preposition attached and it refers to the eyes of the priest.
[13:55] 52 tn The terms “back side” and “front side” are the same as those used in v. 42 for the “back or front bald area” of a man’s head. The exact meaning of these terms when applied to articles of cloth or leather is uncertain. It could refer, for example, to the inside versus the outside of a garment, or the back versus the front side of an article of cloth or leather. See J. Milgrom, Leviticus (AB), 1:814, for various possibilities.
[13:56] 53 tn Heb “And if the priest saw and behold….”
[13:56] 54 tn Heb “and he shall tear it from.”
[13:57] 55 tn Heb “And if”; NIV, NCV “But if”; NAB “If, however.”
[13:58] 56 tn Heb “and the infection turns aside from them.”
[13:59] 57 sn The Hebrew term translated “law” (תוֹרָה, torah) introduces here a summary or colophon for all of Lev 13. Similar summaries are found in Lev 7:37-38; 11:46-47; 14:54-57; and 15:32-33.
[13:59] 58 tn These are declarative Piel forms of the verbs טָהֵר (taher) and טָמֵא (tame’) respectively (cf. the notes on vv. 3 and 6 above).
