Leviticus 13:35

13:35 If, however, the scall spreads further ¹  on the skin after his purification,

Leviticus 13:22

13:22 If ²  it is spreading further ³  on the skin, then the priest is to pronounce him unclean. ⁴  It is an infection.

Leviticus 14:39

14:39 The priest must return on the seventh day and examine it, and if ⁵  the infection has spread in the walls of the house,

Leviticus 13:5

13:5 The priest must then examine it on the seventh day, and if, ⁶  as far as he can see, the infection has stayed the same ⁷  and has not spread on the skin, ⁸  then the priest is to quarantine the person for another seven days. ⁹ 

Leviticus 13:7

13:7 If, however, the scab is spreading further ¹⁰  on the skin after he has shown himself to the priest for his purification, then he must show himself to the priest a second time.

Leviticus 13:27

13:27 The priest must then examine it on the seventh day, and if it is spreading further ¹¹  on the skin, then the priest is to pronounce him unclean. It is a diseased infection. ¹² 

Leviticus 13:36

13:36 then the priest is to examine it, and if ¹³  the scall has spread on the skin the priest is not to search further for reddish yellow hair. ¹⁴  The person ¹⁵  is unclean.

Leviticus 13:53

13:53 But if the priest examines it and ¹⁶  the infection has not spread in the garment or in the warp or in the woof or in any article of leather,

Leviticus 14:44

14:44 the priest is to come and examine it, and if ¹⁷  the infection has spread in the house, it is a malignant disease in the house. It is unclean.

Leviticus 13:6

13:6 The priest must then examine it again on the seventh day, ¹⁸  and if ¹⁹  the infection has faded and has not spread on the skin, then the priest is to pronounce the person clean. ²⁰  It is a scab, ²¹  so he must wash his clothes ²²  and be clean.

Leviticus 13:32

13:32 The priest must then examine the infection on the seventh day, and if ²³  the scall has not spread, there is no reddish yellow hair in it, and the scall does not appear to be deeper than the skin, ²⁴ 

Leviticus 13:34

13:34 The priest must then examine the scall on the seventh day, and if ²⁵  the scall has not spread on the skin and it does not appear to be deeper than the skin, ²⁶  then the priest is to pronounce him clean. ²⁷  So he is to wash his clothes and be clean.

Leviticus 13:51

13:51 He must then examine the infection on the seventh day. If the infection has spread in the garment, or in the warp, or in the woof, or in the leather – whatever the article into which the leather was made ²⁸  – the infection is a malignant disease. It is unclean.

Leviticus 13:55

13:55 The priest must then examine it after the infection has been washed out, and if ²⁹  the infection has not changed its appearance ³⁰  even though the infection has not spread, it is unclean. You must burn it up in the fire. It is a fungus, whether on the back side or front side of the article. ³¹ 

Leviticus 14:48

14:48 “If, however, the priest enters ³²  and examines it, and the ³³  infection has not spread in the house after the house has been replastered, then the priest is to pronounce the house clean because the infection has been healed.

[13:35]  ¹ tn Heb “And if spreading (infinitive absolute) it spreads further (finite verb).” For the infinitive absolute used to highlight contrast rather than emphasis see GKC 343 §113.p.

[13:22]  ² tn Heb “and if.”

[13:22]  ³ tn Heb “is indeed spreading.”

[13:22]  ⁴ tn This is the declarative Piel of the verb טָמֵא (tame’, cf. the note on v. 3 above).

[14:39]  ³ tn Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV); NASB “If the mark has indeed spread.”

[13:5]  ⁴ tn Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV).

[13:5]  ⁵ tn Heb “the infection has stood in his eyes”; ASV “if in his eyes the plague be at a stay.”

[13:5]  ⁶ tn Although there is no expressed “and” at the beginning of this clause, there is in the corresponding clause of v. 6, so it should be assumed here as well.

[13:5]  ⁷ tn Heb “a second seven days.”

[13:7]  ⁵ tn Heb “And if spreading [infinitive absolute] it spreads [finite verb].” For the infinitive absolute used to highlight contrast rather than emphasis see GKC 343 §113.p.

[13:27]  ⁶ tn Heb “is indeed spreading.”

[13:27]  ⁷ tn For the rendering “diseased infection” see the note on v. 2 above.

[13:36]  ⁷ tn Heb “and behold.”

[13:36]  ⁸ tn Heb “the priest shall not search to the reddish yellow hair.”

[13:36]  ⁹ tn Heb “he”; the referent (the affected person) is specified in the translation for clarity (likewise in the following verse).

[13:53]  ⁸ tn Heb “And if the priest sees and behold”; NASB “and indeed.”

[14:44]  ⁹ tn Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV); NASB “If he sees that the mark has indeed spread.”

[13:6]  ¹⁰ tn That is, at the end of the second set of seven days referred to at the end of v. 5, a total of fourteen days after the first appearance before the priest.

[13:6]  ¹¹ tn Heb “and behold.”

[13:6]  ¹² tn Heb “he shall make him clean.” The verb is the Piel of טָהֵר (taher, “to be clean”). Here it is a so-called “declarative” Piel (i.e., “to declare clean”), but it also implies that the person is put into the category of being “clean” by the pronouncement itself (J. E. Hartley, Leviticus [WBC], 176; cf. the corresponding opposite in v. 3 above).

[13:6]  ¹³ tn On the term “scab” see the note on v. 2 above. Cf. NAB “it was merely eczema”; NRSV “only an eruption”; NLT “only a temporary rash.”

[13:6]  ¹⁴ tn Heb “and he shall wash his clothes.”

[13:32]  ¹¹ tn Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV).

[13:32]  ¹² tn Heb “and the appearance of the scall is not deep ‘from’ (comparative מִן, min, meaning “deeper than”) the skin.”

[13:34]  ¹² tn Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV).

[13:34]  ¹³ tn Heb “and its appearance is not deep ‘from’ (comparative מִן, min, meaning “deeper than”) the skin.”

[13:34]  ¹⁴ tn This is the declarative Piel of the verb טָהֵר (taher, cf. the note on v. 6 above).

[13:51]  ¹³ tn Heb “to all which the leather was made into a handiwork.”

[13:55]  ¹⁴ tn Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV).

[13:55]  ¹⁵ tn Heb “the infection has not changed its eye.” Smr has “its/his eyes,” as in vv. 5 and 37, but here it refers to the appearance of the article of cloth or leather, unlike vv. 5 and 37 where there is a preposition attached and it refers to the eyes of the priest.

[13:55]  ¹⁶ tn The terms “back side” and “front side” are the same as those used in v. 42 for the “back or front bald area” of a man’s head. The exact meaning of these terms when applied to articles of cloth or leather is uncertain. It could refer, for example, to the inside versus the outside of a garment, or the back versus the front side of an article of cloth or leather. See J. Milgrom, Leviticus (AB), 1:814, for various possibilities.

[14:48]  ¹⁵ tn Heb “And if the priest entering [infinitive absolute] enters [finite verb]” For the infinitive absolute used to highlight contrast rather than emphasis see GKC 343 §113.p.

[14:48]  ¹⁶ tn Heb “and behold” (so KJV, ASV); NASB “and the mark has not indeed spread.”