Matthew 4:18
Context4:18 As 1 he was walking by the Sea of Galilee he saw two brothers, Simon (called Peter) and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea (for they were fishermen). 2
Matthew 10:2
Context10:2 Now these are the names of the twelve apostles: 3 first, Simon 4 (called Peter), and Andrew his brother; James son of Zebedee and John his brother;
Matthew 13:55
Context13:55 Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t his mother named Mary? 5 And aren’t his brothers James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas?
Matthew 16:17
Context16:17 And Jesus answered him, 6 “You are blessed, Simon son of Jonah, because flesh and blood 7 did not reveal this to you, but my Father in heaven!


[4:18] 1 tn Here δέ (de) has not been translated.
[4:18] 2 tn The two phrases in this verse placed in parentheses are explanatory comments by the author, parenthetical in nature.
[10:2] 3 sn The term apostles is rare in the gospels, found only here, Mark 3:14, and six more times in Luke (6:13; 9:10; 11:49; 17:5; 22:14; 24:10).
[10:2] 4 sn In the various lists of the twelve, Simon (that is, Peter) is always mentioned first (see also Mark 3:16-19; Luke 6:13-16; Acts 1:13) and the first four are always the same, though not in the same order after Peter.
[13:55] 5 sn The reference to Jesus as the carpenter’s son is probably derogatory, indicating that they knew Jesus only as a common laborer like themselves. The reference to his mother…Mary (even though Jesus’ father was probably dead by this point) appears to be somewhat derogatory, for a man was not regarded as his mother’s son in Jewish usage unless an insult was intended (cf. Judg 11:1-2; John 4:41; 8:41; 9:29).
[16:17] 7 tn Grk “answering, Jesus said to him.” The participle ἀποκριθείς (apokriqeis) is redundant, but the syntax of this phrase has been modified for clarity.
[16:17] 8 tn The expression “flesh and blood” could refer to “any human being” (so TEV, NLT; cf. NIV “man”), but it could also refer to Peter himself (i.e., his own intuition; cf. CEV “You didn’t discover this on your own”). Because of the ambiguity of the referent, the phrase “flesh and blood” has been retained in the translation.