Numbers 2:1

Context

The Arrangement of the Tribes

2:1 ¹The Lord spoke to Moses and to Aaron:

Numbers 3:14

Context

The Numbering of the Levites

3:14 Then the Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai:

Numbers 4:1

Context

The Service of the Kohathites

4:1 ²Then the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron:

Numbers 4:17

Context

4:17 Then the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron:

Numbers 9:4

Context
9:4 So Moses instructed³ the Israelites to observe⁴ the Passover.

Numbers 14:17

Context
14:17 So now, let the power of my Lord⁵ be great, just as you have said,

Numbers 14:26

Context

14:26 The Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron:

Numbers 16:20

Context

The Judgment on the Rebels

16:20 The Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron:

Numbers 19:1

Context

The Red Heifer Ritual

19:1 ⁶The Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron:

[2:1] ¹sn For this chapter, see C. E. Douglas, “The Twelve Houses of Israel,” JTS 37 (1936): 49-56; C. C. Roach, “The Camp in the Wilderness: A Sermon on Numbers 2:2,” Int 13 (1959): 49-54; and G. St. Clair, “Israel in Camp: A Study,” JTS 8 (1907): 185-217.

[4:1] ²sn The chapter has four main parts to it: Kohathites (1-20), Gershonites (21-28), Merarites (29-33) and the census of the Levites (34-49).

[9:4] ³tn Heb “spoke to.”

[9:4] ⁴tn The infinitive construct functions as the direct object of the preceding verb (a Hebrew complementary usage), answering the question of what he said.

[14:17] ⁴tc The form in the text is אֲדֹנָי (’adonay), the word that is usually used in place of the tetragrammaton. It is the plural form with the pronominal suffix, and so must refer to God.

[19:1] ⁵sn In the last chapter the needs of the priests and Levites were addressed. Now the concern is for the people. This provision from the sacrifice of the red heifer is a precaution to ensure that the purity of the tabernacle was not violated by pollutions of impurity or death. This chapter has two main parts, both dealing with ceremonial purity: the ritual of the red heifer (vv. 1-10), and the purification from uncleanness (vv. 11-22). For further study see J. Milgrom, “The Paradox of the Red Cow (Num 19),” VT 31 (1981): 62-72.