NETBible KJV GRK-HEB XRef Names Arts Hymns

  Discovery Box

Numbers 4:16

Context

4:16 “The appointed responsibility of Eleazar son of Aaron the priest is for the oil for the light, and the spiced incense, and the daily grain offering, and the anointing oil; he also has 1  the appointed responsibility over all the tabernacle with 2  all that is in it, over the sanctuary and over all its furnishings.” 3 

Numbers 6:14

Context
6:14 and he must present his offering 4  to the Lord: one male lamb in its first year without blemish for a burnt offering, one ewe lamb in its first year without blemish for a purification offering, one ram without blemish for a peace offering, 5 

Numbers 10:29

Context
The Appeal to Hobab

10:29 6 Moses said to Hobab son of Reuel, the Midianite, Moses’ father-in-law, 7  “We are journeying to the place about which the Lord said, ‘I will give it to you.’ Come with us and we will treat you well, 8  for the Lord has promised good things 9  for Israel.”

Numbers 15:24

Context
15:24 then if anything is done unintentionally 10  without the knowledge of 11  the community, the whole community must prepare one young bull for a burnt offering – for a pleasing aroma to the Lord – along with its grain offering and its customary drink offering, and one male goat for a purification offering.

Numbers 22:4-5

Context

22:4 So the Moabites said to the elders of Midian, “Now this mass of people 12  will lick up everything around us, as the bull devours the grass of the field. Now Balak son of Zippor was king of the Moabites at this time. 22:5 And he sent messengers to Balaam 13  son of Beor at Pethor, which is by the Euphrates River 14  in the land of Amaw, 15  to summon him, saying, “Look, a nation has come out of Egypt. They cover the face 16  of the earth, and they are settling next to me.

Numbers 31:8

Context
31:8 They killed the kings of Midian in addition to those slain – Evi, Rekem, Zur, Hur, and Reba – five Midianite kings. 17  They also killed Balaam son of Beor with the sword. 18 

Numbers 32:33

Context
Land Assignment

32:33 So Moses gave to the Gadites, the Reubenites, and to half the tribe of Manasseh son of Joseph the realm of King Sihon of the Amorites, and the realm of King Og of Bashan, the entire land with its cities and the territory surrounding them. 19 

Drag to resizeDrag to resize

[4:16]  1 tn This is supplied to the line to clarify “appointed.”

[4:16]  2 tn Heb “and.”

[4:16]  3 sn One would assume that he would prepare and wrap these items, but that the Kohathites would carry them to the next place.

[6:14]  4 tn Heb “he shall offer his offering” – the object is a cognate accusative.

[6:14]  5 sn The peace offering שְׁלָמִים (shÿlamim) is instructed in Lev 3 and 7. The form is always in the plural. It was a sacrifice that celebrated the fact that the worshiper was at peace with God, and was not offered in order to make peace with God. The peace offering was essentially a communal meal in the presence of God. Some have tried to equate this offering with similar sounding names in Akkadian and Ugaritic (see B. A. Levine, In the Presence of the Lord [SJLA], 3-52), but the unique features of the Israelite sacrifice make this connection untenable.

[10:29]  7 sn For additional bibliography for this short section, see W. F. Albright, “Jethro, Hobab, and Reuel in Early Hebrew Tradition,” CBQ 25 (1963): 1-11; G. W. Coats, “Moses in Midian,” JBL 92 (1973): 3-10; B. Mazar, “The Sanctuary of Arad and the Family of Hobab the Kenite,” JNES 24 (1965): 297-303; and T. C. Mitchell, “The Meaning of the Noun h£tn in the Old Testament,” VT 19 (1969): 93-112.

[10:29]  8 sn There is a problem with the identity of Hobab. The MT says that he is the son of Reuel, making him the brother-in-law of Moses. But Judg 4:11 says he is the father-in-law. In Judg 1:16; 4:11 Hobab is traced to the Kenites, but in Exod 3:1 and 18:1 Jethro (Reuel) is priest of Midian. Jethro is identified with Reuel on the basis of Exod 2:18 and 3:1, and so Hobab becomes Moses’ חֹתֵן (khoten), a relative by marriage and perhaps brother-in-law. There is not enough information to decide on the identity and relationships involved here. Some suggest that there is one person with the three names (G. B. Gray, Numbers [ICC], 93); others suggest Hobab is a family name (R. F. Johnson, IDB 2:615), and some suggest that the expression “the son of Reuel the Midianite” had dropped out of the genealogy of Judges, leading to the conflict (J. Crichton, ISBE 2:1055). If Hobab is the same as Jethro, then Exod 18:27 does not make much sense, for Jethro did go home. On this basis many conclude Hobab is a brother-in-law. This would mean that after Jethro returned home, Moses conversed with Hobab, his brother-in-law. For more discussion, see the articles and the commentaries.

[10:29]  9 tn The verb is the Hiphil of the root “to be good” (יָטַב, yatav); it may be translated “treat well, deal favorably, generously with.” Here it is a perfect tense with vav (ו) following the imperative, showing a sequence in the verbal ideas.

[10:29]  10 tn The Hebrew text simply has “has spoken good” for Israel.

[15:24]  10 tn The idea of לִשְׁגָגָה (lishgagah) seems to be that of “inadvertence” or “without intent.” The text gives no indication of how this offense might be committed, or what it might include. It probably describes any transgressions done in ignorance of the Law that involved a violation of tabernacle procedure or priestly protocol or social misdemeanor. Even though it was done unintentionally, it was still a violation and called for ritual purification.

[15:24]  11 tn Heb “[away] from the eyes of the community.”

[22:4]  13 tn The word is simply “company,” but in the context he must mean a vast company – a horde of people.

[22:5]  16 sn There is much literature on pagan diviners and especially prophecy in places in the east like Mari (see, for example, H. B. Huffmon, “Prophecy in the Mari Letters,” BA 31 [1968]: 101-24). Balaam appears to be a pagan diviner who was of some reputation; he was called to curse the Israelites, but God intervened and gave him blessings only. The passage forms a nice complement to texts that deal with blessings and curses. It shows that no one can curse someone whom God has blessed.

[22:5]  17 tn Heb “by the river”; in most contexts this expression refers to the Euphrates River (cf. NAB, NCV, NRSV, TEV, CEV, NLT).

[22:5]  18 tn Heb “in the land of Amaw” (cf. NAB, NRSV, TEV); traditionally “in the land of the sons of his people.” The LXX has “by the river of the land.”

[22:5]  19 tn Heb “eye.” So also in v. 11.

[31:8]  19 sn Here again we see that there was no unified empire, but Midianite tribal groups.

[31:8]  20 sn And what was Balaam doing among the Midianites? The implication is strong. This pagan diviner had to submit to the revealed will of God in the oracles, but he nonetheless could be hired. He had been a part of the attempt to destroy Israel that failed; he then apparently became part of the plan, if not the adviser, to destroy them with sexual immorality and pagan ritual.

[32:33]  22 tn Heb “the land with its cities in the borders of the cities of the land all around.”



TIP #14: Use the Discovery Box to further explore word(s) and verse(s). [ALL]
created in 0.04 seconds
powered by
bible.org - YLSA