Proverbs 18:22
Context18:22 The one who finds 1 a wife finds what is enjoyable, 2
and receives a pleasurable gift 3 from the Lord. 4
Proverbs 19:14
Context19:14 A house and wealth are inherited from parents, 5
but a prudent wife 6 is from the Lord.
Malachi 2:14
Context2:14 Yet you ask, “Why?” The Lord is testifying against you on behalf of the wife you married when you were young, 7 to whom you have become unfaithful even though she is your companion and wife by law. 8
Ephesians 5:28
Context5:28 In the same way 9 husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.
Ephesians 5:33
Context5:33 Nevertheless, 10 each one of you must also love his own wife as he loves himself, 11 and the wife must 12 respect 13 her husband.
[18:22] 1 tn The verb מָצָא (matsa’, translated “finds”) is used twice in the first colon. It is paralleled by the verb פּוּק (puq, translated “receives”) in the second colon, which carries the same nuance as the preceding verbs. The first perfect tense verb might function in a hypothetical or conditional sense: “If a man finds…then he finds.” But taken as a principle the nuances of the verbs would be gnomic or characteristic.
[18:22] 2 tn Heb “good.” The term טוֹב (tov, “good; enjoyable; fortune”) might be an allusion to Gen 2:18, which affirms that it is not good for man to be alone. The word describes that which is pleasing to God, beneficial for life, and abundantly enjoyable.
[18:22] 3 tn Heb “what is pleasant.” The noun רָצוֹן (ratson, “what is pleasing”) is often interpreted in a religious-theological sense here: “receives favor from the
[18:22] 4 tc The LXX adds this embellishment to complete the thought: “Whoever puts away a good wife puts away good, and whoever keeps an adulteress is foolish and ungodly.”
[19:14] 5 tn Heb “inheritance of fathers” (so KJV, ASV, NASB).
[19:14] 6 sn This statement describes a wife who has a skillful use of knowledge and discretion that proves to be successful. This contrasts with the preceding verse. The proverb is not concerned about unhappy marriages or bad wives (both of which exist); it simply affirms that when a marriage works out well one should credit it as a gift from God.
[2:14] 7 tn Heb “the
[2:14] 8 sn Though there is no explicit reference to marriage vows in the OT (but see Job 7:13; Prov 2:17; Ezek 16:8), the term law (Heb “covenant”) here asserts that such vows or agreements must have existed. References to divorce documents (e.g., Deut 24:1-3; Jer 3:8) also presuppose the existence of marriage documents.
[5:33] 10 tn The translation of πλήν (plhn) is somewhat difficult in this context, though the overall thrust of the argument is clear. It could be an adversative idea such as “but,” “nevertheless,” or “however” (see NIV, NASB, NRSV), or it could simply be intended to round out and bring to conclusion the author’s discussion. In this latter case it could be translated with the use of “now” (so A. T. Lincoln, Ephesians [WBC], 384).
[5:33] 11 tn Grk “Nevertheless, you also, one by one, each his own wife so let him love as himself.” This statement is cumbersome and was cleaned up to reflect better English style.
[5:33] 12 tn The ἵνα (Jina) clause was taken as imperatival, i.e., “let the wife respect….”
[5:33] 13 tn The Greek verb φοβέομαι (fobeomai) here has been translated “respect” and the noun form of the word, i.e., φόβος (fobos), has been translated as “reverence” in 5:21.