Romans 2:4

2:4 Or do you have contempt for the wealth of his kindness, forbearance, and patience, and yet do not know ¹  that God’s kindness leads you to repentance?

Romans 5:16

5:16 And the gift is not like the one who sinned. ²  For judgment, resulting from the one transgression, ³  led to condemnation, but ⁴  the gracious gift from the many failures ⁵  led to justification.

Romans 7:25

7:25 Thanks be ⁶  to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, ⁷  I myself serve the law of God with my mind, but ⁸  with my flesh I serve ⁹  the law of sin.

Romans 9:11

9:11 even before they were born or had done anything good or bad (so that God’s purpose in election ¹⁰  would stand, not by works but by ¹¹  his calling) ¹²  –

Romans 12:8

12:8 if it is exhortation, he must exhort; if it is contributing, he must do so with sincerity; if it is leadership, he must do so with diligence; if it is showing mercy, he must do so with cheerfulness.

Romans 16:19

16:19 Your obedience is known to all and thus I rejoice over you. But I want you to be wise in what is good and innocent in what is evil.

[2:4]  ¹ tn Grk “being unaware.”

[5:16]  ² tn Grk “and not as through the one who sinned [is] the gift.”

[5:16]  ³ tn The word “transgression” is not in the Greek text at this point, but has been supplied for clarity.

[5:16]  ⁴ tn Greek emphasizes the contrast between these two clauses more than can be easily expressed in English.

[5:16]  ⁵ tn Or “falls, trespasses,” the same word used in vv. 15, 17, 18, 20.

[7:25]  ³ tc ‡ Most mss (א* A 1739 1881 Ï sy) read “I give thanks to God” rather than “Now thanks be to God” (א¹ [B] Ψ 33 81 104 365 1506 pc), the reading of NA²⁷. The reading with the verb (εὐχαριστῶ τῷ θεῷ, eucaristw tw qew) possibly arose from a transcriptional error in which several letters were doubled (TCGNT 455). The conjunction δέ (de, “now”) is included in some mss as well (א¹ Ψ 33 81 104 365 1506 pc), but it should probably not be considered original. The ms support for the omission of δέ is both excellent and widespread (א* A B D 1739 1881 Ï lat sy), and its addition can be explained as an insertion to smooth out the transition between v. 24 and 25.

[7:25]  ⁴ tn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing.

[7:25]  ⁵ tn Greek emphasizes the contrast between these two clauses more than can be easily expressed in English.

[7:25]  ⁶ tn The words “I serve” have been repeated here for clarity.

[9:11]  ⁴ tn Grk “God’s purpose according to election.”

[9:11]  ⁵ tn Or “not based on works but based on…”

[9:11]  ⁶ tn Grk “by the one who calls.”