NETBible KJV GRK-HEB XRef Names Arts Hymns

  Discovery Box

Ruth 2:2

Context
2:2 One day Ruth the Moabite said to Naomi, “Let me go 1  to the fields so I can gather 2  grain behind whoever permits me to do so.” 3  Naomi 4  replied, “You may go, my daughter.”

Ruth 2:18

Context
Ruth Returns to Naomi

2:18 She carried it back to town, and her mother-in-law saw 5  how much grain 6  she had gathered. Then Ruth 7  gave her the roasted grain she had saved from mealtime. 8 

Drag to resizeDrag to resize

[2:2]  1 tn The cohortative here (“Let me go”) expresses Ruth’s request. Note Naomi’s response, in which she gives Ruth permission to go to the field.

[2:2]  2 tn Following the preceding cohortative, the cohortative with vav conjunctive indicates purpose/result.

[2:2]  3 tn Heb “anyone in whose eyes I may find favor” (ASV, NIV similar). The expression אֶמְצָא־חֵן בְּעֵינָיו (’emtsa-khen bÿenayv, “to find favor in the eyes of [someone]”) appears in Ruth 2:2, 10, 13. It is most often used when a subordinate or servant requests permission for something from a superior (BDB 336 s.v. חֵן). Ruth will play the role of the subordinate servant, seeking permission from a landowner, who then could show benevolence by granting her request to glean in his field behind the harvest workers.

[2:2]  4 tn Heb “she”; the referent (Naomi) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[2:18]  5 tc MT vocalizes ותרא as the Qal verb וַתֵּרֶא (vattere’, “and she saw”), consequently of “her mother-in-law” as subject and “what she gathered” as the direct object: “her mother-in-law saw what she gathered.” A few medieval Hebrew mss (also reflected in Syriac and Vulgate) have the Hiphil וַתַּרְא (vattar’, “and she showed”), consequently taking “her mother-in-law” as the direct object and “what she gathered” as the double direct-object: “she showed her mother-in-law what she had gathered” (cf. NAB, TEV, CEV, NLT). Although the latter has the advantage of making Ruth the subject of all the verbs in this verse, it would be syntactically difficult. For one would expect the accusative sign אֶת (’et) before “her mother-in-law” if it were the direct object of a Hiphil verb in a sentence with a double direct object introduced by the accusative sign אֶת, e.g., “to show (Hiphil of רָאָה, raah) your servant (direct object marked by accusative sign אֶת) your greatness (double direct object marked by accusative sign אֶת) (Deut 3:24). Therefore the MT reading is preferred.

[2:18]  6 tn Heb “that which”; the referent (how much grain) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[2:18]  7 tn Heb “she”; the referent (Ruth) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[2:18]  8 tn Heb “and she brought out and gave to her that which she had left over from her being satisfied.”



TIP #35: Tell your friends ... become a ministry partner ... use the NET Bible on your site. [ALL]
created in 0.02 seconds
powered by
bible.org - YLSA