Discovery Box| (0.51336655384615) | (Zec 1:7) |
1 sn The twenty-fourth day of the eleventh month…in Darius’ second year was February 15, 519 |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Mat 4:5) |
1 sn The order of the second and third temptations differs in Luke’s account (4:5-12) from the order given in Matthew. |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Mat 18:35) |
1 tn Grk “his.” The pronoun has been translated to follow English idiom (the last pronoun of the verse [“from your heart”] is second person plural in the original). |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Luk 2:20) |
2 sn The mention of glorifying and praising God is the second note of praise in this section; see Luke 2:13-14. |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Luk 5:27) |
4 sn It is possible that Levi is a second name for Matthew, because people often used alternative names in 1st century Jewish culture. |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Luk 6:2) |
2 tn Note that the verb is second person plural (with an understood plural pronominal subject in Greek). The charge is again indirectly made against Jesus by charging the disciples. |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Luk 16:7) |
1 tn Grk “He”; the referent (the second debtor) has been specified in the translation for clarity. Here δέ (de) has not been translated for stylistic reasons. |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Joh 3:3) |
3 sn Or born again. The Greek word ἄνωθεν (anwqen) can mean both “again” and “from above,” giving rise to Nicodemus’ misunderstanding about a second physical birth (v. 4). |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Joh 3:12) |
1 tn The word “people” is not in the Greek text, but is supplied to indicate that the verb is second person plural (referring to more than Nicodemus alone). |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Joh 21:16) |
2 tn Grk “said again.” The word “again” (when used in connection with the phrase “a second time”) is redundant and has not been translated. |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Joh 21:19) |
4 tn Grk “After he said this, he said to him”; the referents (first Jesus, second Peter) have been specified in the translation for clarity. |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Act 8:25) |
4 tn Grk “they were returning to Jerusalem and were proclaiming.” The first imperfect is taken ingressively and the second is viewed iteratively (“proclaiming…as they went”). |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Rom 2:10) |
1 tn Grk “but even,” to emphasize the contrast. The second word has been omitted since it is somewhat redundant in English idiom. |
| (0.51336655384615) | (2Co 8:15) |
1 tn The word “gathered” is not in the Greek text, but is implied (so also for the second occurrence of the word later in the verse). |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Gal 2:2) |
6 tn Here the first verb (τρέχω, trecw, “was not running”) is present subjunctive, while the second (ἔδραμον, edramon, “had not run”) is aorist indicative. |
| (0.51336655384615) | (Gal 5:17) |
1 tn The words “has desires” do not occur in the Greek text a second time, but are repeated in the translation for clarity. |
| (0.51336655384615) | (1Th 4:10) |
1 tn Grk “brothers”; this applies to the second occurrence as well. See note on the phrase “brothers and sisters” in 1:4. |
| (0.49652933846154) | (Exo 1:18) |
2 tn The second verb in Pharaoh’s speech is a preterite with a vav (ו) consecutive. It may indicate a simple sequence: “Why have you done…and (so that you) let live?” It could also indicate that this is a second question, “Why have you done …[why] have you let live?” |
| (0.49652933846154) | (2Ki 6:21) |
1 tn Heb “Should I strike them down? I will strike them down.” In the Hebrew text the first person imperfect form is repeated; the first form has the interrogative he prefixed to it; the second does not. It is likely that the second form should be omitted as dittographic or that the first should be emended to an infinitive absolute. |
| (0.49652933846154) | (1Ch 2:42) |
1 tc Heb “and the sons of Mareshah,” but this does not fit contextually. Perhaps the text originally had וּבְנוֹ מִשְׁנֶה מָרֵשָׁה (uvÿno mishneh mareshah, “and his second son, Mareshah”), with מִשְׁנֶה (“second”) later accidentally falling out by homoioteleuton (cf. the note in BHS here). |
