Discovery Box| (0.56368705) | (Gen 41:30) |
1 tn The perfect with the vav consecutive continues the time frame of the preceding participle, which has an imminent future nuance here. |
| (0.56368705) | (Gen 43:7) |
5 tn The infinitive absolute emphasizes the imperfect verbal form, which here is a historic future (that is, future from the perspective of a past time). |
| (0.56368705) | (Gen 43:8) |
2 tn After the preceding cohortatives, the prefixed verbal form (either imperfect or cohortative) with the prefixed conjunction here indicates purpose or result. |
| (0.56368705) | (Gen 43:12) |
2 tn Heb “take back in your hand.” The imperfect verbal form probably has an injunctive or obligatory force here, since Jacob is instructing his sons. |
| (0.56368705) | (Gen 43:25) |
3 tn Heb “eat bread.” The imperfect verbal form is used here as a historic future (future from the perspective of the past). |
| (0.56368705) | (Gen 44:16) |
2 tn The Hitpael form of the verb צָדֵק (tsadeq) here means “to prove ourselves just, to declare ourselves righteous, to prove our innocence.” |
| (0.56368705) | (Gen 45:8) |
1 tn Heb “a father.” The term is used here figuratively of one who gives advice, as a father would to his children. |
| (0.56368705) | (Gen 46:7) |
1 tn The Hebrew text adds “with him” here. This is omitted in the translation because it is redundant in English style (note the same phrase earlier in the verse). |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 2:4) |
3 tn The verb is a Niphal imperfect; it should be classified here as a historic future, future from the perspective of a point in a past time narrative. |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 2:15) |
2 tn Heb הַדָּבָר (haddavar, “the word [thing, matter, incident]”) functions here like a pronoun to refer in brief to what Moses had done. |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 3:13) |
4 tn The imperfect tense here has a deliberative nuance (“should”), for Moses is wondering what would be best to say when the Israelites want proof of the calling. |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 3:18) |
4 tn The form used here is the cohortative of הָלַךְ (halakh). It could be a resolve, but more likely before Pharaoh it is a request. |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 3:18) |
5 tn Here a cohortative with a vav (ו) follows a cohortative; the second one expresses purpose or result: “let us go…in order that we may.” |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 3:21) |
2 tn The temporal indicator (here future) with the particle ki (וְהָיָה כִּי, vÿhaya ki) introduces a temporal clause. |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 4:9) |
3 tn The verb form is the perfect tense with the vav (ו) consecutive; it functions then as the equivalent of the imperfect tense – here as an imperfect of instruction. |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 4:11) |
1 tn The verb שִׂים (sim) means “to place, put, set”; the sentence here more precisely says, “Who put a mouth into a man?” |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 4:14) |
5 tn The particle הִנֵּה (hinneh) with the participle points to the imminent future; it means “he is about to come” or “here he is coming.” |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 5:18) |
2 tn The imperfect תִּתֵּנּוּ (tittennu) is here taken as an obligatory imperfect: “you must give” or “you must produce.” |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 6:12) |
3 tn The final clause begins with a disjunctive vav (ו), a vav on a nonverb form – here a pronoun. It introduces a circumstantial causal clause. |
| (0.56368705) | (Exo 7:10) |
1 tn The clause begins with the preterite and the vav (ו) consecutive; it is here subordinated to the next clause as a temporal clause. |
