Discovery Box| (0.148863125) | (2Ch 32:5) |
4 sn The phrase the City of David refers here to the fortress of Zion in Jerusalem, not to Bethlehem. See 2 Sam 5:7. |
| (0.148863125) | (2Ch 32:12) |
1 tn Heb “Did not he, Hezekiah, eliminate…?” This rhetorical question presupposes a positive reply (“yes, he did”) and so has been translated here as a positive statement. |
| (0.148863125) | (2Ch 32:30) |
1 sn The phrase the City of David refers here to the fortress of Zion in Jerusalem, not to Bethlehem. See 2 Sam 5:7. |
| (0.148863125) | (2Ch 33:14) |
2 sn The phrase the City of David refers here to the fortress of Zion in Jerusalem, not to Bethlehem. See 2 Sam 5:7. |
| (0.148863125) | (2Ch 36:7) |
2 tn Heb “in Babylon.” Repeating the proper name “Babylon” here would be redundant in contemporary English, so “there” has been used in the translation. |
| (0.148863125) | (Ezr 7:1) |
2 tn The words “came up from Babylon” do not appear in the Hebrew text until v. Kir+Heres&tab=notes" ver="">6. They have been supplied here for the sake of clarity. |
| (0.148863125) | (Ezr 9:5) |
1 tn The Hebrew word used here is a hapax legomenon. It refers to the self-abasement that accompanies religious sorrow and fasting. |
| (0.148863125) | (Neh 6:9) |
1 tn The participle has a desiderative nuance here, describing the desire of the subject and not necessarily the actual outcome. See also v. Kir+Heres&tab=notes" ver="">14. |
| (0.148863125) | (Neh 6:16) |
1 tc The MT understands the root here to be יָרֵא (yare’, “to fear”) rather than רָאָה (ra’ah, “to see”). |
| (0.148863125) | (Neh 7:73) |
2 tn The traditional understanding of the chapter and verse division here is probably incorrect. The final part of v. Kir+Heres&tab=notes" ver="">73 is best understood as belonging with Kir+Heres&tab=notes" ver="">8:1. |
| (0.148863125) | (Neh 8:3) |
2 tn Heb “all who could hear with understanding.” The word “children” is understood to be implied here by a number of English versions (e.g., NAB, TEV, NLT). |
| (0.148863125) | (Neh 8:9) |
1 tc The unexpected reference to Nehemiah here has led some scholars to suspect that the phrase “Nehemiah the governor” is a later addition to the text and not original. |
| (0.148863125) | (Neh 9:30) |
1 tn The Hebrew expression here is elliptical. The words “your kindness” are not included in the Hebrew text, but have been supplied in the translation for clarity. |
| (0.148863125) | (Est 1:5) |
2 tc The LXX has ἕξ ({ex, “six”) instead of “seven.” Virtually all English versions follow the reading of the MT here, “seven.” |
| (0.148863125) | (Est 1:10) |
2 tn Heb “King Ahasuerus”; here the proper name has been replaced by the pronoun “him” in the translation for stylistic reasons. Cf. similarly NIV, NCV, CEV, NLT “King Xerxes.” |
| (0.148863125) | (Est 4:1) |
1 tn Heb “Mordecai.” The pronoun (“he”) was used in the translation for stylistic reasons. A repetition of the proper name here is redundant in terms of contemporary English style. |
| (0.148863125) | (Est 4:13) |
1 tn Heb “Mordecai.” The pronoun (“he”) was used in the translation for stylistic reasons. A repetition of the proper name here is redundant in terms of contemporary English style. |
| (0.148863125) | (Est 7:7) |
1 sn There is great irony here in that the man who set out to destroy all the Jews now finds himself begging for his own life from a Jew. |
| (0.148863125) | (Est 8:4) |
1 tn Heb “Esther.” The pronoun (“she”) was used in the translation for stylistic reasons. A repetition of the proper name is redundant here in terms of contemporary English style. |
| (0.148863125) | (Job 1:3) |
1 tn The word means “cattle, livestock, possessions” (see also Gen 26:14). Here it includes the livestock, but also the entire substance of his household. |
