Discovery Box| (0.148863125) | (Rom 5:18) |
3 tn Here ἀνθρώπους (anqrwpou") has been translated as a generic (“people”) since both men and women are clearly intended in this context. |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 6:6) |
1 tn Grk “knowing this, that.” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started here in the translation. |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 6:9) |
1 tn Grk “knowing.” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started here in the translation. |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 6:9) |
2 tn The present tense here has been translated as a futuristic present (see ExSyn 536, where this verse is listed as an example). |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 7:3) |
1 tn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing. |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 7:25) |
2 tn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing. |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 8:12) |
1 tn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing. |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 8:33) |
1 sn An allusion to Isa 50:8 where the reference is singular; Paul applies this to all believers (“God’s elect” is plural here). |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 8:37) |
2 tn Here the referent could be either God or Christ, but in v. Kir+Heres&tab=notes" ver="">39 it is God’s love that is mentioned. |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 9:4) |
1 tn Grk “of whom.” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started here in the translation. |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 9:5) |
1 tn Grk “of whom are the fathers.” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started here in the translation. |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 9:16) |
1 sn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing. |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 9:18) |
1 sn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing. |
| (0.148863125) | (Rom 10:17) |
2 tn The genitive could be understood as either subjective (“Christ does the speaking”) or objective (“Christ is spoken about”), but the latter is more likely here. |
| (0.148863125) | (1Co 1:8) |
1 tn Grk “who,” referring to Christ. Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started here in the translation. |
| (0.148863125) | (2Co 1:5) |
1 tn This Greek word translated “sufferings” here (πάθημα, paqhma) is a different one than the one Paul uses for his own afflictions/persecutions (θλῖψις, qliyi") in v. Kir+Heres&tab=notes" ver="">4. |
| (0.148863125) | (2Co 1:5) |
2 tn I.e., suffering incurred by Paul as a consequence of his relationship to Christ. The genitive could be considered to have a causative nuance here. |
| (0.148863125) | (2Co 1:23) |
3 sn Paul had promised to come again to visit (see 2 Cor 1:15, 24) but explains here why he had changed his plans. |
| (0.148863125) | (2Co 4:2) |
1 tn L&N 13.156; the word can also mean “to assert opposition to,” thus here “we have denounced” (L&N 33.220). |
| (0.148863125) | (2Co 4:9) |
2 tn Or “badly hurt.” It is possible to interpret καταβαλλόμενοι (kataballomenoi) here as “badly hurt”: “[we are] badly hurt, but not destroyed” (L&N 20.21). |
(NT only) to listen to the NET Bible 
