Discovery Box| (0.75388069230769) | (Rev 1:14) |
3 tn The genitive noun πυρός (puros) has been translated as an attributive genitive. |
| (0.69818226923077) | (Num 23:3) |
2 tn Heb “and the word of what he shows me.” The noun is in construct, and so the clause that follows functions as a noun clause in the genitive. The point is that the word will consist of divine revelation. |
| (0.69818226923077) | (1Sa 10:5) |
1 tn Or “sentries.” Some translate “outpost” (NIV) or “garrison” (NAB, NRSV, NLT) here (see 1 Sam 13:3). The noun is plural in the Hebrew text, but the LXX and other ancient witnesses read a singular noun here. |
| (0.69818226923077) | (2Sa 22:37) |
2 tn Heb “lower legs.” On the meaning of the Hebrew noun, which occurs only here, see H. R. Cohen, Biblical Hapax Legomena (SBLDS), 112. A cognate Akkadian noun means “lower leg.” |
| (0.69818226923077) | (Job 27:3) |
1 tn The adverb עוֹד (’od) was originally a noun, and so here it could be rendered “all the existence of my spirit.” The word comes between the noun in construct and its actual genitive (see GKC 415 §128.e). |
| (0.69818226923077) | (Psa 18:36) |
2 tn Heb “lower legs.” On the meaning of the Hebrew noun, which occurs only here, see H. R. Cohen, Biblical Hapax Legomena (SBLDS), 112. A cognate Akkadian noun means “lower leg.” |
| (0.69818226923077) | (Pro 2:14) |
4 tn Heb “the perversity of evil” (so NASB). The noun רָע (ra’, “evil”) functions as an attributed genitive which is modified by the construct noun תַהְפֻּכוֹת (tahpukhot, “perversity”) which functions as an attributive adjective. |
| (0.69818226923077) | (Lam 2:15) |
3 tn Heb “perfection of beauty.” The noun יֹפִי (yofi, “beauty”) functions as a genitive of respect in relation to the preceding construct noun: Jerusalem was perfect in respect to its physical beauty. |
| (0.69818226923077) | (2Co 11:17) |
1 tn Grk “with this confidence of boasting.” The genitive καυχήσεως (kauchsew") has been translated as an attributed genitive (the noun in the genitive gives an attribute of the noun modified). |
| (0.69392105769231) | (Gen 24:53) |
1 tn Heb “the servant”; the noun has been replaced by the pronoun (“he”) in the translation for stylistic reasons. |
| (0.69392105769231) | (Gen 29:2) |
3 tn The disjunctive clause (introduced by the noun with the prefixed conjunction) provides supplemental information that is important to the story. |
| (0.69392105769231) | (Gen 30:39) |
2 tn Heb “the sheep.” The noun has been replaced by the pronoun (“they”) in the translation for stylistic reasons. |
| (0.69392105769231) | (Gen 41:35) |
3 tn Heb “[for] food in the cities.” The noun translated “food” is an adverbial accusative in the sentence. |
| (0.69392105769231) | (Exo 2:9) |
2 tn The possessive pronoun on the noun “wage” expresses the indirect object: “I will pay wages to you.” |
| (0.69392105769231) | (Exo 16:23) |
3 tn The two verbs in these objective noun clauses are desiderative imperfects – “bake whatever you want to bake.” |
| (0.69392105769231) | (Exo 34:9) |
2 tn Heb “it is.” Hebrew uses the third person masculine singular pronoun here in agreement with the noun “people.” |
| (0.69392105769231) | (Lev 21:6) |
3 tc Smr and all early versions have the plural adjective “holy” rather than the MT singular noun “holiness.” |
| (0.69392105769231) | (Num 9:6) |
1 tn In the Hebrew text the noun has no definite article, and so it signifies “some” or “certain” men. |
| (0.69392105769231) | (Num 13:31) |
1 tn The vav (ו) disjunctive on the noun at the beginning of the clause forms a strong adversative clause here. |
| (0.69392105769231) | (Num 14:10) |
2 tn The vav (ו) on the noun “glory” indicates a strong contrast, one that interrupts their threatened attack. |
(NT only) to listen to the NET Bible 
