Internet Verse Search Commentaries Word Analysis ITL - draft

1 John 3:1

Context
NETBible

(See what sort of love the Father has given to us: that 1  we should be called God’s children – and indeed 2  we are! 3  For this reason 4  the world does not know us: because it did not know him. 5 

NIV ©

biblegateway 1Jo 3:1

How great is the love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him.

NASB ©

biblegateway 1Jo 3:1

See how great a love the Father has bestowed on us, that we would be called children of God; and such we are. For this reason the world does not know us, because it did not know Him.

NLT ©

biblegateway 1Jo 3:1

See how very much our heavenly Father loves us, for he allows us to be called his children, and we really are! But the people who belong to this world don’t know God, so they don’t understand that we are his children.

MSG ©

biblegateway 1Jo 3:1

What marvelous love the Father has extended to us! Just look at it--we're called children of God! That's who we really are. But that's also why the world doesn't recognize us or take us seriously, because it has no idea who he is or what he's up to.

BBE ©

SABDAweb 1Jo 3:1

See what great love the Father has given us in naming us the children of God; and such we are. For this reason the world does not see who we are, because it did not see who he was.

NRSV ©

bibleoremus 1Jo 3:1

See what love the Father has given us, that we should be called children of God; and that is what we are. The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him.

NKJV ©

biblegateway 1Jo 3:1

Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed on us, that we should be called children of God! Therefore the world does not know us, because it did not know Him.

[+] More English

KJV
Behold
<1492> (5628)_,
what manner
<4217>
of love
<26>
the Father
<3962>
hath bestowed
<1325> (5758)
upon us
<2254>_,
that
<2443>
we should be called
<2564> (5686)
the sons
<5043>
of God
<2316>_:
therefore
<1223> <5124>
the world
<2889>
knoweth
<1097> (5719)
us
<2248>
not
<3756>_,
because
<3754>
it knew
<1097> (5627)
him
<846>
not
<3756>_.
NASB ©

biblegateway 1Jo 3:1

See
<3708>
how
<4217>
great
<4217>
a love
<26>
the Father
<3962>
has bestowed
<1325>
on us, that we would be called
<2564>
children
<5043>
of God
<2316>
; and such we are. For this
<3778>
reason
<1223>
the world
<2889>
does not know
<1097>
us, because
<3754>
it did not know
<1097>
Him.
NET [draft] ITL
(See
<1492>
what sort
<4217>
of love
<26>
the Father
<3962>
has given
<1325>
to us
<2254>
: that
<2443>
we should be called
<2564>
God’s
<2316>
children
<5043>
– and
<2532>
indeed we are
<1510>
! For
<1223>
this reason
<5124>
the world
<2889>
does
<1097>
not
<3756>
know
<1097>
us
<2248>
: because
<3754>
it did
<1097>
not
<3756>
know
<1097>
him
<846>
.
GREEK
idete agaphn dedwken o pathr ina tekna yeou klhywmen esmen touto o kosmov ou ginwskei oti ouk egnw

NETBible

(See what sort of love the Father has given to us: that 1  we should be called God’s children – and indeed 2  we are! 3  For this reason 4  the world does not know us: because it did not know him. 5 

NET Notes

tn The ἵνα (Jina) clause is best understood (1) as epexegetical (or explanatory), clarifying the love (ἀγάπην, agaphn) that the Father has given to believers. Although it is possible (2) to regard the ἵνα as indicating result, the use of ποταπήν (potaphn, “what sort of”) to modify ἀγάπην suggests that the idea of “love” will be qualified further in the following context, and this qualification is provided by the epexegetical ἵνα clause.

tn “Indeed” is not in the Greek text but is supplied to indicate emphasis.

tc The phrase καὶ ἐσμεν (kai esmen, “and we are”) is omitted in 049 69 Ï. There seems to be no theological reason to omit the words. This has all the earmarks of a classic case of homoioteleuton, for the preceding word (κληθῶμεν, klhqwmen, “we should be called”) ends in -μεν (-men).

tn The indicative mood indicates that the verb ἐσμέν (esmen) at the end of 3:1a is not governed by the ἵνα (Jina) and does not belong with the ἵνα clause, since this would have required a subjunctive. If the verb ἐσμέν were subjunctive, the force of the clause would be “that we should be called children of God, and be (children of God).” With ἐσμέν as indicative, the clause reads “that we should be called children of God, and indeed we are (children of God).”

tn Lexically it is clear that this phrase indicates reason, but what is not clear is whether (1) τοῦτο (touto) refers to what follows, (2) to what precedes, or (3) to both (as with the ἐν τοῦτο [en touto] phrases throughout 1 John). Διὰ τοῦτο (dia touto) occurs 15 times in the Gospel of John, and a pattern emerges which is so consistent that it appears to be the key to the usage here. Six times in the Gospel of John (5:16, 18; 8:47; 10:17; 12:18, 39) the phrase refers to what follows, and in each of these instances an epexegetical ὅτι (Joti) clause follows. Nine times in John (1:31, 6:65, 7:21-22, 9:23, 12:27, 13:11, 15:19, 16:15, 19:11) the phrase refers to what precedes, and in none of these instances is it followed by a ὅτι clause. The phrase διὰ τοῦτο is used three times in the Johannine Epistles. In two of these (1 John 4:5, 3 John 10) there is no ὅτι clause following, and so the διὰ τοῦτο should refer to preceding material. Here in 3:1 there is an epexegetical ὅτι clause following, so the διὰ τοῦτο should (unless it is the only exception in the Gospel of John and the Johannine Epistles) refer to what follows, that is, to the ὅτι clause itself. This is indicated by the colon in the translation.

sn The pronoun him is a clear reference to Jesus Christ (compare John 1:10).




TIP #34: What tip would you like to see included here? Click "To report a problem/suggestion" on the bottom of page and tell us. [ALL]
created in 0.03 seconds
powered by
bible.org - YLSA