![](images/minus.gif)
Text -- Leviticus 27:26 (NET)
![](images/arrow_open.gif)
![](images/advanced.gif)
![](images/advanced.gif)
![](images/advanced.gif)
Names, People and Places, Dictionary Themes and Topics
![](images/arrow_open.gif)
![](images/information.gif)
![](images/cmt_minus_head.gif)
collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per phrase)
Wesley: Lev 27:26 - -- By vow; because it is not his own, but the Lord's already, and therefore to vow such a thing to God is a tacit derogation from, and an usurpation of t...
By vow; because it is not his own, but the Lord's already, and therefore to vow such a thing to God is a tacit derogation from, and an usurpation of the Lord's right, and a mocking of God by pretending to give what we cannot withhold from him.
![](images/cmt_minus.gif)
Wesley: Lev 27:26 - -- Under these two eminent kinds he comprehends all other beasts which might be sacrificed to God, the firstlings whereof could not be redeemed but were ...
Under these two eminent kinds he comprehends all other beasts which might be sacrificed to God, the firstlings whereof could not be redeemed but were to be sacrificed; whereas the firstlings of men were to be redeemed, and therefore were capable of being vowed, as we see, 1Sa 1:11.
JFB -> Lev 27:26-27
JFB: Lev 27:26-27 - -- These, in the case of clean beasts, being consecrated to God by a universal and standing law (Exo 13:12; Exo 34:19), could not be devoted; and in that...
These, in the case of clean beasts, being consecrated to God by a universal and standing law (Exo 13:12; Exo 34:19), could not be devoted; and in that of unclean beasts, were subject to the rule mentioned (Lev 27:11-12).
Calvin -> Lev 27:26
Calvin: Lev 27:26 - -- 26.Only the firstling of the beasts Here a caution is interposed, that none should offer what is already the property of God. For since men are so gr...
26.Only the firstling of the beasts Here a caution is interposed, that none should offer what is already the property of God. For since men are so greatly given to ostentation, and therefore in testifying their piety whitewash two walls, as the saying is, out of the same pot, God provides against this sin by forbidding the first-born to be offered to Him, since that would be to present stolen goods to Him. The sum is, that they should not, by consecrating to God what is already due to Him, steal from Him in their fictitious liberality what is consecrated and not their own. Nor let us be surprised at this law, because this ambition is almost natural to us all, to desire to lay God under obligation by the empty appearance of liberality, and therefore to seek for various grounds of boasting of religious duties, which, after all, are nought. And, undoubtedly, if this restraint had not been put upon the Jews, they would have aimed at the reputation of double zeal by this deceitful oblation, nor would they have scrupled, under the pretext of offering, to deprive God of what was His own.
TSK -> Lev 27:26
TSK: Lev 27:26 - -- the firstling : Heb. first born, etc. As these firstlings were the Lord’ s before, it would have been a solemn mockery to pretend to make them a ...
the firstling : Heb. first born, etc. As these firstlings were the Lord’ s before, it would have been a solemn mockery to pretend to make them a matter of a singular vow; for they were already appointed, if clean, to be sacrificed.
which : Exo 13:2, Exo 13:12, Exo 13:13, Exo 22:30; Num 18:17; Deu 15:19
![](images/cmt_minus_head.gif)
collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per Verse)
Poole -> Lev 27:26
Poole: Lev 27:26 - -- No man shall sanctify it to wit, by vow; because it is not his own, but the Lord’ s already, and therefore to vow such a thing to God is a tacit...
No man shall sanctify it to wit, by vow; because it is not his own, but the Lord’ s already, and therefore to vow such a thing to God is a tacit derogation from and a usurpation of the Lord’ s right, and a mocking of God by pretending to give him what we cannot withhold from him.
Ox or sheep: under these two eminent kinds he comprehends all other beasts which might be sacrificed to God, the firstlings whereof could not be redeemed, but were to be sacrificed; whereas the firstlings of men were to be redeemed, and therefore were capable of being vowed, as we see 1Sa 1:11 .
Haydock -> Lev 27:26
Haydock: Lev 27:26 - -- First-born. Septuagint add "a beasts." Men, though belonging to the Lord on that title already, (Exodus xiii. 2,) might still be more particularly ...
First-born. Septuagint add "a beasts." Men, though belonging to the Lord on that title already, (Exodus xiii. 2,) might still be more particularly consecrated to him by vow, as Samuel was. (Calmet) ---
A vow must be concerning some greater good to which we are not otherwise bound. Such vows are agreeable to God, and can never be broken without sin. See Genesis xxxi. 13., and 1 Timothy v. 12. (Worthington)
Gill -> Lev 27:26
Gill: Lev 27:26 - -- Only the firstlings of the beasts,.... These are excepted from being sanctified, or set apart for sacred uses, for a very good reason, suggested in th...
Only the firstlings of the beasts,.... These are excepted from being sanctified, or set apart for sacred uses, for a very good reason, suggested in the next clause:
which should be the Lord's firstling, no man shall sanctify it; it being what he has a claim upon, and ordered to be sanctified to him by a law previous to this, Exo 13:2; wherefore to sanctify such a creature, would be to sanctify what was his before; not merely in a general sense, in which all creatures are his, but in a special sense, having in a peculiar manner required it as his; and therefore to sanctify, or vow to him, what was his before, must be trifling with him, and mocking of him:
whether it be ox, or sheep; the firstlings of either of them:
it is the Lord's; which he has claimed as his own special and peculiar property, antecedent to any vow of its owner.
![](images/cmt_minus_head.gif)
expand allCommentary -- Verse Notes / Footnotes
![](images/cmt_minus_head.gif)
expand allCommentary -- Verse Range Notes
TSK Synopsis -> Lev 27:1-34
TSK Synopsis: Lev 27:1-34 - --1 He that makes a singular vow must be the Lord's.3 The estimation of the person;9 of a beast given by vow;14 of a house;16 of a field, and the redemp...
MHCC -> Lev 27:26-33
MHCC: Lev 27:26-33 - --Things or persons devoted, are distinguished from things or persons that were only sanctified. Devoted things were most holy to the Lord, and could ne...
Matthew Henry -> Lev 27:26-34
Matthew Henry: Lev 27:26-34 - -- Here is, I. A caution given that no man should make such a jest of sanctifying things to the Lord as to sanctify any firstling to him, for that was ...
Keil-Delitzsch -> Lev 27:26-27
Keil-Delitzsch: Lev 27:26-27 - --
What belonged to the Lord by law could not be dedicated to Him by a vow, especially the first-born of clean cattle (cf. Exo 13:1-2). The first-born ...
Constable: Lev 17:1--27:34 - --II. The private worship of the Israelites chs. 17--27
The second major division of Leviticus deals with how the ...
![](images/cmt_minus.gif)
Constable: Lev 27:1-34 - --H. DIRECTIONS CONCERNING VOWS ch. 27
The blessings and curses (ch. 26) were in a sense God's vows to His...
![](images/cmt_minus.gif)