1 Corinthians 3:7
Context3:7 So neither the one who plants counts for anything, 1 nor the one who waters, but God who causes the growth.
1 Corinthians 3:11
Context3:11 For no one can lay any foundation other than what is being laid, which is Jesus Christ.
1 Corinthians 4:3-4
Context4:3 So for me, it is a minor matter that I am judged by you or by any human court. In fact, I do not even judge myself. 4:4 For I am not aware of anything against myself, but I am not acquitted because of this. The one who judges me is the Lord.
1 Corinthians 11:14-15
Context11:14 Does not nature 2 itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace for him, 11:15 but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering. 3
1 Corinthians 14:14
Context14:14 If 4 I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my mind is unproductive.
1 Corinthians 14:33
Context14:33 for God is not characterized by disorder but by peace.
As in all the churches of the saints, 5
1 Corinthians 14:37
Context14:37 If anyone considers himself a prophet or spiritual person, he should acknowledge that what I write to you is the Lord’s command.
1 Corinthians 15:17
Context15:17 And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is useless; you are still in your sins.


[11:14] 2 sn Paul does not mean nature in the sense of “the natural world” or “Mother Nature.” It denotes “the way things are” because of God’s design.
[11:15] 3 sn No word for veil or head covering occurs in vv. 3-14 (see the note on authority in v. 10). That the hair is regarded by Paul as a covering in v. 15 is not necessarily an argument that the hair is the same as the head covering that he is describing in the earlier verses (esp. v. 10). Throughout this unit of material, Paul points out the similarities of long hair with a head covering. But his doing so seems to suggest that the two are not to be identified with each other. Precisely because they are similar they do not appear to be identical (cf. vv. 5, 6, 7, 10, 13). If head covering = long hair, then what does v. 6 mean (“For if a woman will not cover her head, she should cut off her hair”)? This suggests that the covering is not the same as the hair itself.
[14:14] 4 tc ‡ Most witnesses, including some important ones (א A Ds Ψ 048 Ï lat sy bo), have γάρ (gar, “for”) here, while an equally impressive array of witnesses lack the conjunction (Ì46 B F G 0243 1739 1881 sa). This conjunction was frequently added by scribes in epistolary literature as a clarifying word, making the connection with the preceding more explicit. As such, it has the earmarks of being a motivated reading and thus should be rejected. NA27 places the word in brackets, indicating doubts as to its authenticity.