
Text -- Haggai 2:12 (NET)




Names, People and Places, Dictionary Themes and Topics



collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per phrase)
Wesley: Hag 2:12 - -- Part of the sacrifice, legally sanctified, or made holy by the altar on which the whole was sanctified.
Part of the sacrifice, legally sanctified, or made holy by the altar on which the whole was sanctified.

Wesley: Hag 2:12 - -- In the lap of his garment, or in any other cloth, and if this cloth touch any common thing as bread, &c., shall that become legally holy?
In the lap of his garment, or in any other cloth, and if this cloth touch any common thing as bread, &c., shall that become legally holy?
JFB -> Hag 2:12
JFB: Hag 2:12 - -- "Holy flesh" (that is, the flesh of a sacrifice, Jer 11:15), indeed, makes holy the "skirt" in which it is carried; but that "skirt" cannot impart its...
"Holy flesh" (that is, the flesh of a sacrifice, Jer 11:15), indeed, makes holy the "skirt" in which it is carried; but that "skirt" cannot impart its sanctity to any thing beyond, as "bread," &c. (Lev 6:27). This is cited to illustrate the principle, that a sacrifice, holy, as enveloping divine things (just as the "skirt" is "holy" which envelops "holy" flesh), cannot by its inherent or opus operatum efficacy make holy a person whose disobedience, as that of the Jew while neglecting God's house, made him unholy.
Defender -> Hag 2:12
Defender: Hag 2:12 - -- The questions in Hag 2:12, Hag 2:13 are dealing with the ceremonial laws of Moses (Hag 2:11). One such group of laws stipulated that ritualistic clean...
TSK -> Hag 2:12

collapse allCommentary -- Word/Phrase Notes (per Verse)
Barnes -> Hag 2:11-14
Barnes: Hag 2:11-14 - -- Ask now the priests concerning the law - The priests answer rightly, that, by the law, insulated unholiness spread further than insulated holin...
Ask now the priests concerning the law - The priests answer rightly, that, by the law, insulated unholiness spread further than insulated holiness. The flesh of the sacrifice hallowed whatever it should touch, but not further; but the human being, who was defiled by touching a dead body, defiled all he might touch Num 19:22. Haggai does not apply the first part; namely, that the worship on the altar which they reared, while they neglected the building of the temple, did not hallow. The possession of a truly tiring does not counterbalance disobedience. Contrariwise, one defilement defiled the whole man and all which he touched, according to that Jam 2:10, "whosoever shall keep the whole law and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."
In the application, the two melt into one, for the holy thing, namely, the altar which they raised out of fear on their return, so far from hallowing the land or people by the sacrifices offered thereon, was itself defiled. "This people"and "this nation"(not "My people") since they in act disowned Him. "Whatever they offer there,"i. e., on that altar, instead of the temple which God commanded, is unclean, offending Him who gave all.
Poole -> Hag 2:12
Poole: Hag 2:12 - -- If one any one, bear, carry away from the altar, or the priest’ s hands,
holy flesh part of the sacrifice, legally and ceremonially sanctified...
If one any one, bear, carry away from the altar, or the priest’ s hands,
holy flesh part of the sacrifice, legally and ceremonially sanctified, or made holy by the altar on which the whole was sanctified, of which a part is supposed to be carried away
in the skirt of his garment in the lap of his garment, or in any other cloth or napkin, and this cloth touch any common thing,
as bread & c., shall that common thing by such contact become legally or ceremonially holy?
The priests answered: who these priests were is not mentioned, but it is likely that there were some among the people who did by the prophet’ s persuasion go and propose the case, and they received the answer as here in the negative, for neither mediate nor yet immediate touch of holy things could make common things or unholy persons holy.
If one any one, bear, carry away from the altar, or the priest’ s hands,
holy flesh part of the sacrifice, legally and ceremonially sanctified, or made holy by the altar on which the whole was sanctified, of which a part is supposed to be carried away
in the skirt of his garment in the lap of his garment, or in any other cloth or napkin, and this cloth touch any common thing,
as bread & c., shall that common thing by such contact become legally or ceremonially holy?
The priests answered: who these priests were is not mentioned, but it is likely that there were some among the people who did by the prophet’ s persuasion go and propose the case, and they received the answer as here in the negative, for neither mediate nor yet immediate touch of holy things could make common things or unholy persons holy.
Haydock -> Hag 2:12
Haydock: Hag 2:12 - -- The law. "He who knows it not, shews himself to be no priest of the Lord," Deuteronomy xvii. (St. Jerome)
The law. "He who knows it not, shews himself to be no priest of the Lord," Deuteronomy xvii. (St. Jerome)
Gill -> Hag 2:12
Gill: Hag 2:12 - -- If one bear holy flesh in the skirt of his garment,.... Or, "carry" it q; from one place to another in his pockets or bags, which were in the skirts o...
If one bear holy flesh in the skirt of his garment,.... Or, "carry" it q; from one place to another in his pockets or bags, which were in the skirts of his garments. This is to be understood of the flesh of creatures offered in sacrifice, which were sanctified or separated for holy use; part of which belonged to the priests, who might carry it in their pockets to the proper place of eating it:
and with his skirt do touch bread, or pottage, or wine, or oil, or any meat: which were not holy, and not separated for holy use, but were common meats and drinks: now the question upon this is,
shall it be holy? that is, if either of those common things were touched by the skirt, in the pockets of which the holy flesh were carried, whether they were made holy by such a touch, and no more remained common or profane?
and the priests answered and said, No; they were not sanctified; for though the garment itself was sanctified thereby, and might not be employed in common use till washed, Lev 6:27 yet a garment so touched could not convey holiness to whatsoever that touched, or that touched it.

expand allCommentary -- Verse Notes / Footnotes
NET Notes -> Hag 2:12
NET Notes: Hag 2:12 This is probably not an appeal to the Torah (i.e., the Pentateuch) as such but to a priestly ruling (known in postbiblical Judaism as a pÿsaq din...
Geneva Bible -> Hag 2:12
Geneva Bible: Hag 2:12 If one bear ( g ) holy flesh in the skirt of his garment, and with his skirt do touch bread, or pottage, or wine, or oil, or any meat, shall it be hol...
