2 Samuel 9:8
Context9:8 Then Mephibosheth 1 bowed and said, “Of what importance am I, your servant, that you show regard for a dead dog like me?” 2
Genesis 18:2
Context18:2 Abraham 3 looked up 4 and saw 5 three men standing across 6 from him. When he saw them 7 he ran from the entrance of the tent to meet them and bowed low 8 to the ground. 9
Ruth 2:10
Context2:10 Ruth 10 knelt before him with her forehead to the ground 11 and said to him, “Why are you so kind 12 and so attentive to me, 13 even though 14 I am a foreigner?” 15
Ruth 2:1
Context2:1 Now Naomi 16 had a relative 17 on her husband’s side of the family named Boaz. He was a wealthy, prominent man from the clan of Elimelech. 18
Ruth 1:20-21
Context1:20 But she replied 19 to them, 20 “Don’t call me ‘Naomi’! 21 Call me ‘Mara’ 22 because the Sovereign One 23 has treated me very harshly. 24 1:21 I left here full, 25 but the Lord has caused me to return empty-handed. 26 Why do you call me ‘Naomi,’ seeing that 27 the Lord has opposed me, 28 and the Sovereign One 29 has caused me to suffer?” 30
[9:8] 1 tn Heb “he”; the referent (Mephibosheth) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
[9:8] 2 tn Heb “What is your servant, that you turn to a dead dog which is like me?”
[18:2] 3 tn Heb “he”; the referent (Abraham) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
[18:2] 4 tn Heb “lifted up his eyes.”
[18:2] 5 tn Heb “and saw, and look.” The particle הִנֵּה (hinneh) draws attention to what he saw. The drawn-out description focuses the reader’s attention on Abraham’s deliberate, fixed gaze and indicates that what he is seeing is significant.
[18:2] 6 tn The Hebrew preposition עַל (’al) indicates the three men were nearby, but not close by, for Abraham had to run to meet them.
[18:2] 7 tn The pronoun “them” has been supplied in the translation for clarification. In the Hebrew text the verb has no stated object.
[18:2] 8 tn The form וַיִּשְׁתַּחוּ (vayyishtakhu, “and bowed low”) is from the verb הִשְׁתַּחֲוָה (hishtakhavah, “to worship, bow low to the ground”). It is probably from a root חָוָה (khavah), though some derive it from שָׁחָה (shakhah).
[18:2] 9 sn The reader knows this is a theophany. The three visitors are probably the
[2:10] 10 tn Heb “she”; the referent (Ruth) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
[2:10] 11 tn Heb “she fell upon her face and bowed to the ground” (KJV, NASB similar).
[2:10] 12 tn Heb “Why do I find favor in your eyes…?” The expression מָצַא חֵן בְּעֵינֶי (matsa’ khen bÿ’eney, “to find favor in the eyes of [someone]”) is often characterized by the following features: (1) A subordinate or servant is requesting permission for something from a superior (master, owner, king). (2) The granting of the request is not a certainty but dependent on whether or not the superior is pleased with the subordinate to do so. (3) The granting of the request by the superior is an act of kindness or benevolence; however, it sometimes reciprocates loyalty previously shown by the subordinate to the superior (e.g., Gen 30:27; 32:6; 33:8, 10, 15; 34:11; 39:4; 47:25, 29; 50:4; Num 32:5; Deut 24:1; 1 Sam 1:18; 16:22; 20:3, 29; 27:3; 2 Sam 14:22; 16:4; 1 Kgs 11:19; Esth 5:8; 7:3; BDB 336 s.v. חֵן). While Boaz had granted her request for permission to glean in his field, she is amazed at the degree of kindness he had shown – especially since she had done nothing, in her own mind, to merit such a display. However, Boaz explains that she had indeed shown kindness to him indirectly through her devotion to Naomi (v. 11).
[2:10] 13 tn Heb “Why do I find favor in your eyes by [you] recognizing me.” The infinitive construct with prefixed לְ (lamed) here indicates manner (“by”).
[2:10] 14 tn Heb “and I am a foreigner.” The disjunctive clause (note the pattern vav + subject + predicate nominative) here has a circumstantial (i.e., concessive) function (“even though”).
[2:10] 15 sn The similarly spelled Hebrew terms נָכַר (nakhar, “to notice”) and נָכְרִי (nokhriy, “foreigner”) in this verse form a homonymic wordplay. This highlights the unexpected nature of the attentiveness and concern Boaz displayed to Ruth.
[2:1] 16 tn The disjunctive clause (note the vav [ו] + prepositional phrase structure) provides background information essential to the following narrative.
[2:1] 17 tc The marginal reading (Qere) is מוֹדַע (moda’, “relative”), while the consonantal text (Kethib) has מְיֻדָּע (miyudda’, “friend”). The textual variant was probably caused by orthographic confusion between consonantal מְיֻדָּע and מוֹדַע. Virtually all English versions follow the marginal reading (Qere), e.g., KJV, NAB, NASB, NRSV “kinsman”; NIV, NCV, NLT “relative.”
[2:1] 18 tn Heb “and [there was] to Naomi a relative, to her husband, a man mighty in substance, from the clan of Elimelech, and his name [was] Boaz.”
[1:20] 19 tn Heb “said.” For stylistic reasons the present translation employs “replied” here.
[1:20] 20 tn The third person feminine plural form of the pronominal suffix indicates the women of the village (see v. 19) are the addressees.
[1:20] 21 sn The name Naomi means “pleasant.”
[1:20] 22 sn The name Mara means “bitter.”
[1:20] 23 tn Heb “Shaddai”; traditionally “the Almighty.” The etymology and meaning of this divine name is uncertain. It may be derived from: (1) שָׁדַד (shadad, “to be strong”), cognate to Arabic sdd, meaning “The Strong One” or “Almighty”; (2) שָׁדָה (shadah, “mountain”), cognate to Akkadian shadu, meaning “The Mountain Dweller” or “God of the Mountains”; (3) שָׁדַד (shadad, “to devastate”) and שַׁד (shad, “destroyer”), Akkadian Shedum, meaning “The Destroyer” or “The Malevolent One”; or (4) שֶׁ (she, “who”) plus דִּי (diy, “sufficient”), meaning “The One Who is Sufficient” or “All-Sufficient One” (HALOT 1420-22 s.v. שַׁדַּי, שַׁדָּי). In terms of use, Shaddai (or El Shaddai) is presented as the sovereign king/judge of the world who grants life/blesses and kills/judges. In Genesis he blesses the patriarchs with fertility and promises numerous descendants. Outside Genesis he blesses/protects and also takes away life/happiness. In light of Naomi’s emphasis on God’s sovereign, malevolent deprivation of her family, one can understand her use of this name for God. For discussion of this divine name, see T. N. D. Mettinger, In Search of God, 69-72.
[1:20] 24 tn Or “caused me to be very bitter”; NAB “has made it very bitter for me.”
[1:21] 25 sn I left here full. That is, with a husband and two sons.
[1:21] 26 tn Heb “but empty the
[1:21] 27 tn The disjunctive clause structure (vav [ו] + subject + verb) here introduces either an attendant circumstance (“when the
[1:21] 28 tc The LXX reads “humbled me” here, apparently understanding the verb as a Piel (עָנָה, ’anah) from a homonymic root meaning “afflict.” However, עָנָה (“afflict”) never introduces its object with בְּ (bet); when the preposition בְּ is used with this verb, it is always adverbial (“in, with, through”). To defend the LXX reading one would have to eliminate the preposition.
[1:21] 29 sn The divine name translated Sovereign One is שַׁדַּי (shadday, “Shaddai”). See further the note on this term in Ruth 1:20.
[1:21] 30 tn Or “brought disaster upon me”; NIV “brought misfortune (calamity NRSV) upon me”; NLT “has sent such tragedy.”