Luke 24:33-53
So ............ They found .... and <2532 2147> [and found.]
saying <3004> [Saying.]
From Mr 16:13, we learn that the apostles did not believe the testimony even of the two disciples from Emmaus, while it is here asserted they were saying, when they entered the room, "The Lord is risen" etc. This difficulty is removed by rendering interrogatively, "Has the Lord risen," etc?
has appeared <3700> [hath.]
<2424> [Jesus.]
Peace <1515> [Peace.]
Then ...... Why ..... and why <2532 5101 1302> [and why.]
my hands ... my <3450 5495> [my hands.]
<3754> [for.]
[believe.]
Do you have <2192> [Have.]
These <3778> [These.]
<5607> [while.]
that everything <3754 3956> [that all.]
in ... law <1722 3551> [in the law.]
prophets <4396> [in the prophets.]
psalms <5568> [in the psalms.]
repentance <3341> [that.]
for ............ to <1519> [among.]
<756> [beginning.]
But <1161> [but.]
as far as <2193> [as far.]
lifting up <1869> [he lifted.]
he departed <1339> [he was.]
they ... him <846> [they.]
with <3326> [with.]
in <1722> [in.]
<281> [Amen.]
CONCLUDING REMARKS ON LUKE'S GOSPEL. Luke, to whom this Gospel has been uniformly attributed from the earliest ages of the Christian church, is generally allowed to have been "the beloved physician" mentioned by Paul, (Col 4:14;) and as he was the companion of that apostle, in all his labours and sufferings, for many years, (Ac 16:12; 20:1-6; 27:1,2; 28:13-16. 2Ti 4:11. Phm 24,) and wrote "the Acts of the Apostles," which conclude with a brief account of Paul's imprisonment at Rome, we may be assured that he had the Apostle's sanction to what he did; and probably this Gospel was written some time before that event, about A.D. 63 or 64, as is generally supposed. He would appear, from Col 4:10, 11, and his intimate acquaintance with the Greek language, as well as from his Greek name [Loukas <\\See definition 3065\\>,] to have been of Gentile extraction; and according to Eusebius and others, he was a native of Antioch. But, from the Hebraisms occurring in his writings, and especially from his accurate knowledge of the Jewish rites, ceremonies, and custom, it is highly probable that he was a Jewish proselyte, and afterwards converted to Christianity. Though he may not have been, as some have affirmed, one of the seventy disciples, and an eye-witness of our Saviour's miracles, yet his intercourse with the apostles, and those who were eye-witnesses of the works and ear witnesses of the words of Christ, renders him an unexceptional witness, if considered merely as an historian; and the early and unanimous reception of his Gospel as divinely inspired is sufficient to satisfy every reasonable person.
