Mark 9:1-27

9:1

standing <3754 2476> [That.]

will ... experience <1089> [taste.]

kingdom <932> [the kingdom.]

9:2

later <3326> [after.]

Peter <4074> [Peter.]

high <5308> [an high.]

he was transfigured <3339> [transfigured.]

9:3

his clothes <846 2440> [his raiment.]

more <3029> [exceeding.]

<3756> [no.]

9:4

appeared <3700> [appeared.]

Elijah <2243> [Elias.]

Moses was the founder of the Jewish polity, and Elias the most zealous reformer and prophet of the Jewish church; and their presence implied that the ministry of Christ was attested by the law and the prophets.

[Elijah. Moses.]

9:5

<2076> [it is.]

9:6

9:7

a cloud .......... cloud <3507> [a cloud.]

This <3778> [This.]

Listen <191> [hear.]

9:8

9:9

he gave ... orders <1291> [he charged.]

<1508> [till.]

9:10

They kept <2902> [they.]

what <5101> [what.]

9:11

9:12

restores <600> [restoreth.]

must suffer <3958> [he must.]

be despised <1847> [set.]

9:13

Elijah <2243> [Elias.]

and they did <2532 4160> [and they.]

9:14

came <2064> [when.]

experts in the law <1122> [the scribes.]

9:15

they were amazed <1568> [were.]

9:16

What <5101> [What.]

[with them. or, among yourselves.]

9:17

I brought <5342> [I.]

mute <216> [a dumb.]

9:18

him it throws him down .................... it <846 4486> [teareth him. or, dasheth him.]

he foams at the mouth <875> [he foameth.]

As these symptoms accord very much with those of epileptic persons, some have ventured to assert that it was no real possession; but the evangelist expressly affirms that he had a "dumb spirit" which tare him, that our Lord charged him to "come out of him," etc.

grinds <5149> [gnasheth.]

and .......... and ............ but they were ... able <2532 2480> [and they.]

9:19

You unbelieving <5599 571> [O faithless.]

9:20

spirit <4151> [the spirit.]

9:21

How <4214> [How.]

9:22

<1536> [if.]

have compassion <4697> [have.]

9:23

If <1487> [If.]

9:24

<3326> [with.]

help <997> [help.]

9:25

he rebuked <2008> [he rebuked.]

Mute <216> [thou.]

If this had been only a natural disease, as some have contended, could our Lord with any propriety have thus addressed it? If the demoniacal possession had been false, or merely a vulgar error, would our Lord, the Revealer of truth, have thus established falsehood, sanctioned error, or encouraged deception, by teaching men to ascribe effects to the malice and power of evil spirits, which they had no agency in producing? Impossible! Such conduct is utterly unworthy the sacred character of the Redeemer.

I command <1473 2004> [I charge.]

9:26

shrieked <2896> [cried.]

9:27